A phenotypic comparison of osteoblast cell lines versus human primary osteoblasts for biomaterials testing.
about
Osteogenic cell differentiation on H-terminated and O-terminated nanocrystalline diamond films.The species translation challenge-a systems biology perspective on human and rat bronchial epithelial cells.Dental pulp pluripotent-like stem cells (DPPSC), a new stem cell population with chromosomal stability and osteogenic capacity for biomaterials evaluation.Overcoming physical constraints in bone engineering: 'the importance of being vascularized'.Choice of osteoblast model critical for studying the effects of electromagnetic stimulation on osteogenesis in vitro.Novel chitosan/diclofenac coatings on medical grade stainless steel for hip replacement applications.Cobalt and chromium exposure affects osteoblast function and impairs the mineralization of prosthesis surfaces in vitro.Bioactivity and bone healing properties of biomimetic porous composite scaffold: in vitro and in vivo studies.Comparison of the reaction of bone-derived cells to enhanced MgCl2-salt concentrations.Quantitative Real-Time Gene Profiling of Human Alveolar Osteoblasts.Enhanced Osteoblast Response to Porosity and Resolution of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Constructs with Trabeculae-Inspired Porosity.Effect of Short-Term Stimulation with Interleukin-1β and Differentiation Medium on Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Paracrine Activity in Coculture with Osteoblasts.Interfacing polymeric scaffolds with primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells to develop 3D cancer modelsCabozantinib targets bone microenvironment modulating human osteoclast and osteoblast functions.Do Surface Porosity and Pore Size Influence Mechanical Properties and Cellular Response to PEEK?Grafting of Bioactive Polymers with Various Architectures: A Versatile Tool for Preparing Antibacterial Infection and Biocompatible Surfaces.Culture of Human Primary Bone Cells and Phenotype Assessment.A preliminary in vitro evaluation of the bioactive potential of cryogel scaffolds incorporated with Manuka honey for the treatment of chronic bone infections.The effects of various mixing solutions on the biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate.Grafting of architecture controlled poly(styrene sodium sulfonate) onto titanium surfaces using bio-adhesive molecules: Surface characterization and biological properties.BiodentineTM is cytocompatible with human primary osteoblasts.Behavior of bone cells in contact with magnesium implant material.Enhanced calcium ion mobilization in osteoblasts on amino group containing plasma polymer nanolayer.Journey into Bone Models: A Review.Comparison of primary human gingival fibroblasts from an older and a young donor on the evaluation of cytotoxicity of denture adhesives.Nanostructured Graphene Surfaces Promote Different Stages of Bone Cell DifferentiationDevelopment of a 3D Collagen Model for the In Vitro Evaluation of Magnetic-assisted OsteogenesisThree-Dimensional In Vitro Hydro- and Cryogel-Based Cell-Culture Models for the Study of Breast-Cancer Metastasis to Bone
P2860
Q35043847-B431874E-8469-4F2D-8563-401C27E5F5E6Q35066534-0D37F431-882B-469A-8805-383BD98F987FQ36352497-4D8C7641-DDF0-4B0A-913D-E8EFE917DC4DQ38659295-2BF0B1A3-72B0-4849-8A94-9CD9638CB3B5Q38761000-63B092F2-8420-4264-951D-67177E088165Q38769112-2D590FBF-B12E-4DB7-84CE-89DC95073517Q38880461-87EB8775-842C-4A75-B49F-9FFE65C896CCQ38908759-44EC4038-36D1-487D-869A-0416A32411EDQ38931588-F15486BA-3982-464E-81A2-DE238D55CAA6Q39125230-D265E182-AA6F-41FF-8E38-F7853C69BCC3Q41786327-17D74C8B-64CC-4B3F-AA50-A153E3F17E44Q41830753-3E239236-49F7-4521-98FB-BCC5A3C68C06Q41990676-6788A72B-36E9-4017-AC3A-F316BF6CE8FBQ42135817-A9E072C0-8930-457C-AFFA-FB288B29A311Q42655366-1D439E08-4FA1-4E3A-80D1-AE0AFCEEDF55Q47228373-21AFDFBF-359D-4B88-B946-92BD379DFC08Q47266545-DEA64BC9-8AD1-4661-BF43-FE7D95332F3AQ47619379-4B08710F-71C0-4B50-B35C-EA833E7C130EQ47689869-854784B8-E092-4D4C-B402-B6C5F12FE551Q48018651-81206C5B-6340-4E16-963E-47FA6DC5D690Q50093076-1D5E64A0-0823-4B26-BAFA-5617C2D1C112Q51693547-01B64665-0A83-4FC8-804B-2A07D3978934Q52626561-953B1B39-2AAC-46C7-9C18-367DA397A46CQ53679131-F6DCDBD9-0BC4-4579-9FA1-3600DBF2B937Q55101467-1ED5EB5F-AA2E-4E74-A7ED-828C26C94D45Q58582441-57F0BB52-7BBB-43B1-8C91-E3F453802848Q58618247-B61C103A-66F2-4759-A94A-4498668BA5F6Q58700178-6A061D0B-3386-46AD-8EF9-8EA28B63DB8E
P2860
A phenotypic comparison of osteoblast cell lines versus human primary osteoblasts for biomaterials testing.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
2013年论文
@zh
2013年论文
@zh-cn
name
A phenotypic comparison of ost ...... asts for biomaterials testing.
@en
A phenotypic comparison of ost ...... asts for biomaterials testing.
@nl
type
label
A phenotypic comparison of ost ...... asts for biomaterials testing.
@en
A phenotypic comparison of ost ...... asts for biomaterials testing.
@nl
prefLabel
A phenotypic comparison of ost ...... asts for biomaterials testing.
@en
A phenotypic comparison of ost ...... asts for biomaterials testing.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
A phenotypic comparison of ost ...... asts for biomaterials testing.
@en
P2093
E M Czekanska
J R Ralphs
R G Richards
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/JBM.A.34937
P577
2013-09-06T00:00:00Z