An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
about
Should processed or raw image data be used in mammographic image quality analyses? A comparative study of three full-field digital mammography systems.Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set.Empirical electro-optical and x-ray performance evaluation of CMOS active pixels sensor for low dose, high resolution x-ray medical imaging.Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.The effects of x-ray beam hardening on detective quantum efficiency and radiation doseStatus and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: parallel-cascaded linear systems analysisSolid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: physical characteristics of an 8 cm x 8 cm experimental prototype.Assessment of detective quantum efficiency: intercomparison of a recently introduced international standard with prior methods.Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image qualityModeling the performance characteristics of computed radiography (CR) systems.Comparison of patient specific dose metrics between chest radiography, tomosynthesis, and CT for adult patients of wide ranging body habitus.Investigation of physical image quality indices of a bone densitometry system.Plate-specific gain map correction for the improvement of detective quantum efficiency in computed radiography.Evaluation of a flat panel digital radiographic system for low-dose portable imaging of neonates.An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images.Determination of the two-dimensional detective quantum efficiency of a computed radiography system.Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system.Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities.Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function.Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum.Contrast-detail analysis of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.Optimized radiographic spectra for small animal digital subtraction angiography.A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems.Signal and noise transfer properties of CMOS based active pixel flat panel imager coupled to structured CsI:Tl.Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology.Comparison of different computed radiography systems: physical characterization and contrast detail analysis.Techniques to improve the accuracy of noise power spectrum measurements in digital x-ray imaging based on background trends removal.Technical Note: modification of the standard gain correction algorithm to compensate for the number of used reference flat frames in detector performance studies.DQE of wireless digital detectors: comparative performance with differing filtration schemes.Characterization of a clinical unit for digital radiography based on irradiation side sampling technology.The noise power spectrum in CT with direct fan beam reconstruction.Local and global 3D noise power spectrum in cone-beam CT system with FDK reconstruction.An experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems (initial experiences and physical evaluation).Relationship between radiation dose reduction and image quality change in photostimulable phosphor luminescence X-ray imaging systemsCOMPARISON OF SURFACE DOSES FROM INDIRECT AND DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY USING OPTICALLY STIMULATED LUMINESCENCE DOSEMETERS.
P2860
Q30791576-B00EEC92-4A38-4055-99E0-83870EEA95E8Q30960507-1D87D0C6-0D1F-4D28-82FF-5E629AC6FBF4Q33314861-5285DB8C-813B-4B07-926D-6018B47A84CFQ33650889-8271668F-309F-4504-AB51-86E3C22FA7F1Q34180448-4B5047CE-F2C7-47E7-A600-A5DE98764B70Q34423508-96198481-B671-46FA-872B-A3FB7C00FF7CQ34789801-9CE5F0E2-3765-481B-854E-8D3E2A6E1618Q34790343-C534D6B4-D687-46C3-9C56-75754A37882AQ36766054-B83E66BB-4482-4172-B727-306706DA954EQ37145911-085C6724-7E2F-4354-92A7-E5BFC9161CBAQ37582468-C686E783-8F3A-4BCA-971D-5E52F962336AQ37701613-C73757D6-4523-4F7A-AD15-F803451E3E8CQ38517509-B9402EF5-911F-4A81-BBD6-73825922BDE5Q39646174-0C4CB5FB-D428-414B-8288-D900143F94B5Q39648255-55A8FC59-DAC7-4C56-8694-66C37E747DABQ39648260-27C14BDD-3F70-4516-B580-705200B4270BQ39657100-25C0A54D-8887-4F21-82C8-35FF11C30342Q39670775-523102B2-C944-44BA-9C19-4C2A2BFA068EQ39673356-9CEA0DA7-A820-4782-A74D-6F5612FDB1B8Q39697839-FC3D59B7-F347-4DC5-90B6-D639CDF5E105Q39711745-0FC69E77-6BDB-4872-836E-6C708651FB95Q39711757-4E8D4F55-C9EC-4558-ABFA-65747787BCE6Q39754958-6F352FE8-C82D-466A-8CD8-89612B8A7C32Q39757582-C950B08C-1B5A-4DB5-AB6D-D33D5F029042Q39757589-653BDE50-72A8-40A5-861F-C2A63E06471AQ39763690-78BBA867-3C31-4C06-9E8F-43C0A90FE4EEQ39777695-0172D618-3161-44BD-A838-613870DCC1EDQ39794148-08AC8CA3-05B1-484D-A76F-7D1908052CA6Q39874850-5EDB598A-0EA5-44E1-93DA-7DD0E65DDDB7Q39900051-DFCBFE2E-1B72-4AED-9F60-E35F0924F524Q39924100-1BA3142E-8175-4E7F-96BF-6E9814A103E1Q39980677-A5122D4F-D796-4B14-9919-30BFC1FFC084Q40010915-F315F0D8-E5BC-4501-837A-646CB553C030Q40129644-772C8880-0A7B-4057-AE4F-280BE9F87856Q40141261-A7272926-1501-4FC0-B40E-8040F9B9234EQ40597725-6913AA40-6B97-4375-8463-3E5EA7A79FB8Q42082119-6AAD1BE3-C2CE-4C54-A8D8-E3DAE4DAA4E4Q42083151-26EFD753-4552-43C8-B3C5-191146136F9FQ42407847-AB5B0FC2-CE31-4F4D-B6A2-2B7E3DD42184Q48532178-71325B2A-81B6-43BF-9EF8-CF92BBACFE65
P2860
An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
2002年论文
@zh
2002年论文
@zh-cn
name
An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
@en
An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
@nl
type
label
An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
@en
An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
@nl
prefLabel
An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
@en
An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
@en
P2093
Ehsan Samei
Michael J Flynn
P2860
P304
P356
10.1118/1.1449873
P407
P577
2002-04-01T00:00:00Z