Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography.
about
Influence of change of tunnel axis angle on tunnel length during double-bundle ACL reconstruction via the transportal techniqueDoes bone impaction technique reduce tunnel enlargement in ACL reconstruction?3D computer tomography for measurement of femoral position in acl reconstruction.Radiographic findings in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from the Mars cohortKnee rotation influences the femoral tunnel angle measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 3-dimensional computed tomography model study.Radiological evaluation for conflict of the femoral tunnel entrance area prior to anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery.In vivo three-dimensional imaging analysis of femoral and tibial tunnel locations in single and double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.Variability in ACL tunnel placement: observational clinical study of surgeon ACL tunnel variability.Reliability of tunnel measurements and the quadrant method using fluoroscopic radiographs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel size: causes of tunnel enlargement and implications for single versus two-stage revision reconstruction.The Anatomic Centers of the Femoral and Tibial Insertions of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review of Imaging and Cadaveric Studies Reporting Normal Center Locations.Plain radiographs can be used for routine assessment of ACL reconstruction tunnel position with three-dimensional imaging reserved for research and revision surgery.Visualization of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction bone tunnels: reliability of standard radiographs, CT scans, and 3D virtual reality images.Surgically oriented measurements for three-dimensional characterization of tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.COMPARISON BETWEEN RENDERING 3D-CT AND TRANSPARENT 3D-CT IN ACL TUNNEL POSITIONING.Low inter- and intraobserver variability allows for reliable tunnel measurement in ACL reconstruction using the quadrant method.Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques.A modified quadrant method for describing the femoral tunnel aperture positions in ACL reconstruction using two-view plain radiographs.Transtibial versus low anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a radiographic study of femoral tunnel position.Clinical outcome of anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction and 3D CT model-based validation of femoral socket aperture position.In-out versus out-in technique for ACL reconstruction: a prospective clinical and radiological comparison.Three dimensionalCT analysis of femoral tunnel position after ACL reconstruction. A prospective study of one hundred and thirty five cases.The posterior horn of the lateral meniscus is a reliable novel landmark for femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction.Anatomic ACL reconstruction: the normal central tibial footprint position and a standardised technique for measuring tibial tunnel location on 3D CT.The quadrant method measuring four points is as a reliable and accurate as the quadrant method in the evaluation after anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.Farmedial versus anteromedial portal drilling of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a computed tomography analysis.Position of anterior cruciate ligament after single-bundle arthroscopic reconstruction.A CT-based classification of prior ACL femoral tunnel location for planning revision ACL surgery.Anatomic attachment of the ACL. Comparison between radiological and CT analysis.Intraoperative Graft Isometry in Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Location of the Femoral Tunnel Aperture in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
P2860
Q30854253-F207ABF5-2C7F-4193-B194-A013044BB279Q33970355-F3413B40-6D87-4734-9AB8-6B165F6F0D39Q35980979-BA528519-A5BF-4076-928C-7F741576B10BQ37028278-E8283057-1DF2-4419-8048-A7BCBE3CB39AQ37445650-93A6DE31-D3FF-422A-B013-8102BB74D5D1Q37605528-97E168C4-A9F6-4A5A-ABBF-FA451CAC2516Q37617435-210016BD-66BD-4A6F-B497-9AE0F975E3A5Q38450991-CE7B06C6-017A-4C6C-99B5-446B0FDE961DQ38458621-8F014584-D8AF-489A-B8A8-FBAE5FBA7396Q39019257-6EAF2A3A-A9BF-4DEC-BE6E-8ECD7DD853CAQ39023853-34350DC0-48BD-499F-9ED6-72B8BCB47433Q39146116-3CDAD791-6612-4BED-A5D4-7E3DF15B1FA2Q40037769-6CB6B592-8D16-4C9C-9CCA-96B000438829Q40057067-A6878FDB-B71E-47C6-A2AF-F17F1EEFE6AAQ41938515-62B3722E-F2AC-4DFA-837F-6DE8685D636BQ43434942-9FD1E161-2C28-41FA-A882-84AA2B0B96E3Q43493304-865A55B3-1FF7-4BDF-9218-CC1D3B9CC87DQ44353599-F78A7CA2-8D9B-4B6F-BB09-CA81EF171F54Q44890518-ACAEA6F7-ADA8-479B-8E35-760D79AE156BQ45557098-96F176AF-5623-4A9A-A379-A77C642F1085Q46958617-F07786A2-A519-4625-B644-3C4AA401F887Q47296910-6A8E74BE-DEC1-41A2-82F0-DBC1D5C0C08CQ47417458-4E6DCD01-9A1C-43ED-B489-AEE96036763BQ48164223-CB4CDD59-7437-44E8-89AA-3A28948A53E6Q48265925-3E49E022-C663-4732-A6E4-D4B3B92CE061Q50584349-AFD9C765-6642-471F-821D-9F4401788385Q52991230-F17EAE33-A795-49BA-8BF2-9C680759A57DQ53186320-79C7565B-95C4-4CE2-98E0-D5AAC5585061Q53248866-21E3E188-BBDB-4C38-9377-9754FF7E9DA4Q55222886-8672988E-9F42-48DD-A2BC-9CE983E856F9Q58005918-E0F91E03-C8EC-484D-81F6-0DD2589735D3
P2860
Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Postoperative evaluation of fe ...... hy versus computed tomography.
@en
Postoperative evaluation of fe ...... hy versus computed tomography.
@nl
type
label
Postoperative evaluation of fe ...... hy versus computed tomography.
@en
Postoperative evaluation of fe ...... hy versus computed tomography.
@nl
prefLabel
Postoperative evaluation of fe ...... hy versus computed tomography.
@en
Postoperative evaluation of fe ...... hy versus computed tomography.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Postoperative evaluation of fe ...... hy versus computed tomography.
@en
P2093
Christian Fink
Christian Hoser
Karl Heinz Kuenzel
Katja Tecklenburg
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00167-004-0548-Y
P577
2005-01-29T00:00:00Z