Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.
about
Optimal breast cancer screening strategies for older women: current perspectivesMeasurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis--a systematic reviewBreast cancer screening: an evidence-based updateVision 20/20: Mammographic breast density and its clinical applicationsThe need for supplemental breast cancer screening modalities: a perspective of population-based breast cancer screening programs in Japan.Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?Intensified surveillance for early detection of breast cancer in high-risk patientsNuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical useDigital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: data and implications for population screening.Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women With Dense Breasts Should Be Offered With Simultaneous Collection of Outcomes Data.Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, FraVisualization of Breast Microcalcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2-Dimensional Digital Mammography Using Specimens.Digital breast tomosynthesis changes management in patients seen at a tertiary care breast center.Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated MeasuresImaging Surveillance After Primary Breast Cancer Treatment.X-ray phase-contrast imaging of the breast--advances towards clinical implementation.Breast cancer detection in digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography-a side-by-side review of discrepant casesPursuing optimal thresholds to recommend breast biopsy by quantifying the value of tomosynthesis.Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammographyClinical implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis.Update on new technologies in digital mammographyThe potential role of dedicated 3D breast CT as a diagnostic tool: review and early clinical examplesComparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.Digital breast tomosynthesis: studies of the effects of acquisition geometry on contrast-to-noise ratio and observer preference of low-contrast objects in breast phantom images.Screening outcomes following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in a general-population screening program.Multiscale bilateral filtering for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.Impact of and interaction between the availability of prior examinations and DBT on the interpretation of negative and benign mammogramsValue analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a commercially-insured US population.Molecular breast imaging: an emerging modality for breast cancer screening.Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views.Comparison of Sonography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Locate Intramammary Marker Clips.Digital breast tomosynthesis: lessons learned from early clinical implementation.X-ray scatter correction in breast tomosynthesis with a precomputed scatter map library.Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts.Mammographic density: Comparison of visual assessment with fully automatic calculation on a multivendor dataset.Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study.Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts.Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspectiveReliability of semiquantitative assessment of osteophytes and subchondral cysts on tomosynthesis images by radiologists with different levels of expertise
P2860
Q26764816-10F0EF74-E5EC-4815-BCEC-079A20BE5894Q27008091-63A25DCB-CA1D-4459-8845-7854CFAFB2B0Q28081267-669E5C96-1B46-4E77-AAA6-F5275A137D04Q28081408-45DF0870-1526-4E28-8B39-43F6E4480F2FQ30249866-BBC5AF67-4486-4C5F-BA9D-A909E9959F3BQ30250289-A334E37B-F184-4239-A7BD-1C5D57686A54Q30392157-65F15CE7-121A-4CAD-9359-C29560303DC3Q30419180-7906F90A-45F3-4AD4-B925-060ACE62C442Q30961920-5843DCAE-050F-4247-BECE-A26FC161DE53Q31036427-21DF9CB4-3665-462F-9BC6-76BC6D03D4A5Q31036434-900623CF-E628-4330-BACE-B518327A575BQ32186742-611ACB5B-8757-47E1-AB68-78D2FB84B671Q33565763-D5FE8FE8-1ED4-4C63-ABB1-46F70B67A3F8Q33711000-79A2DCFB-BBDF-436C-8726-4112DB2C2009Q33750745-0EE9AEB4-64B7-474A-82EF-E8103F23BA32Q33763563-027222E6-138A-44FD-9FB6-604489ED477BQ33782107-304D48F2-4F78-4DD3-B38A-3EDFA2928FCEQ33956271-7E486BAE-C7EC-4FB7-AE1F-DE7AC288A728Q33958483-86003525-428C-41B3-99CA-07FDFF9B2435Q33990504-3A583AF8-17BD-4C57-9E7C-9F68A33CFCF9Q34026149-0685DC08-8300-42D1-83E7-E5E353D7B66CQ34075267-DA3288BC-2178-4CEF-806D-D3F3F1A6F96EQ34364139-67F8F4C2-31DE-469A-8E4C-089620B738E3Q34681114-21039A90-011A-45EE-BE57-6D856AD1AAE3Q34688699-4D3212C5-6D14-4D79-ABA9-E0AF07DA8DB2Q34736145-8E03877D-86ED-4B10-B5FF-BB9F758220EFQ34777538-5FA933B5-D42D-4A77-9E3E-F5A0A4182CF5Q34939196-2668476F-421E-41A0-8E8B-A17A0B772CB5Q34977434-709885E0-52CC-4623-BC1C-642A6039BA93Q35002382-BC873C5B-C529-4BE4-9C30-4062DE09083EQ35038970-E1E2D268-6453-438F-A4B6-3971EC3F67ADQ35054469-A38F391D-93D3-4668-9460-6F6E2838B67BQ35057025-8CCAACC5-C6B5-497C-9FE1-5BCD6A866D25Q35110389-C1A13D77-E3EB-4DEE-A76D-E73FA7095142Q35580579-F5047C7A-856C-4E67-88A4-B9A936DB871CQ35619641-E34E039D-937A-4234-A35D-9B8460CB3DB5Q35646902-F4B6C5B0-2138-484E-B94F-338D1E61106FQ35683407-60A916CA-A469-4A90-9501-D404E01020A0Q35714557-CF07365A-420A-4003-A215-C7967F668664Q35720527-83643572-F570-4BDF-9F4B-F0463181CF38
P2860
Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
2013年论文
@zh
2013年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comparison of digital mammogra ...... ation-based screening program.
@en
type
label
Comparison of digital mammogra ...... ation-based screening program.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of digital mammogra ...... ation-based screening program.
@en
P2093
P356
P1433
P1476
Comparison of digital mammogra ...... ation-based screening program.
@en
P2093
Andriy I Bandos
Ellen B Eben
Gunnar Jahr
Ingvild N Jebsen
Loren T Niklason
Mina Izadi
Mona Krager
Per Skaane
Randi Gullien
P356
10.1148/RADIOL.12121373
P407
P577
2013-01-07T00:00:00Z