about
Assessing patient care: summary of the breakout group on assessment of observable learner performanceRecertification in the United StatesExploring new avenues to assess the sharp end of patient safety: an analysis of nationally aggregated peer review data.Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review.A pilot study of peer review in residency training.Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practiceGMC's proposals for revalidation. Purpose of revalidation process must be agreed onUse of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training.Multisource feedback in the ambulatory setting.Defining and evaluating physician competence in end-of-life patient care. A matter of awareness and emphasis.U.S. Healthcare's quality-based compensation modelThe ethical education of ophthalmology residents: an experiment.Using a 'peer assessment questionnaire' in primary medical care.Medical students' views on peer assessment of professionalismGuidelines for promotion of clinician-educators. The Society of General Internal Medicine Education Committee.A workstation-integrated peer review quality assurance program: pilot studyStudent peer assessment in evidence-based medicine (EBM) searching skills training: an experimentNurses' evaluation of physicians' non-clinical performance in emergency departments: advantages, disadvantages and lessons learnedWhy peer assessment helps to improve clinical performance in undergraduate physical therapy education: a mixed methods design.Factors associated with variability in the assessment of UK doctors' professionalism: analysis of survey results.A qualitative study of why general practitioners may participate in significant event analysis and educational peer assessment.Multisource feedback for residents: how high must the stakes be?Feasibility of implementing a standardized multisource feedback program in the graduate medical education environmentWeb-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback, yet no qualitative improvement?Assessing doctors' competencies using multisource feedback: validating a Japanese version of the Sheffield Peer Review Assessment Tool (SPRAT).Review of instruments for peer assessment of physiciansCritical features of peer assessment of clinical performance to enhance adherence to a low back pain guideline for physical therapists: a mixed methods design.Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments.Patient and physician decision styles and breast cancer chemotherapy use in older women: Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 369901.Continuous professional development in internal medicine: recertification as a measure of professional accountability and quality improvementEvaluation of the physician quality improvement initiative: the expected and unexpected opportunitiesSystematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7.Using 360-degree multi-source feedback to evaluate professionalism in surgery departments: An Iranian perspectiveUse of assessment to reinforce patient safety as a habitProfessionalism and accountability: the role of specialty board certification.A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to 10 tips for their successful design.A structured competency based training programme for junior trainees in emergency medicine: the "Dundee Model"Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31.Revalidation for general practitioners: randomised comparison of two revalidation models
P2860
Q26825751-47E4B102-7834-4758-8C85-819ABD2117E1Q30475859-E311AD0A-16B3-46F8-9FE7-940A53CF5498Q30855412-A18FF20C-9487-48A6-822B-02BEC959310FQ33696218-2C2427D6-24C2-448D-B18C-066A2692CBD7Q33734639-7848ADD3-07AB-48C7-93AC-FC54CC87C179Q33763130-FA879AB1-7419-4A87-A821-093D8F6AC998Q33804034-785FE4B3-46AA-4174-BBA4-DA150993DB4BQ33940705-40A260DF-BA32-407F-AC7D-1F9CE084C6A7Q34136995-FE14F73D-28F0-4311-9337-8D16BFCF409AQ34181765-F2CFDCEC-BA12-4855-8CB7-B2115518200EQ34322497-47DB7EE8-3767-4B2D-94BC-D31C9DCC54D7Q34565401-71E67784-431C-4F9E-A04C-7065749F4C5FQ34623507-1824E9BE-F060-4DC0-9523-85C78A04F17EQ34724068-7A5739F6-3399-413F-BCB9-1B6C0DB99C36Q34754244-C9D9421A-9FF7-46C3-B30E-A002D429F0ACQ34791796-897CE397-D040-4777-8D81-94866D7A6AE6Q35026982-C8842059-F306-4156-ACD8-A543BF6DD7ABQ35142812-3D9FF118-6D3E-402D-89CA-25FFA7AACAF6Q35188057-78E9DACF-ECFB-43BC-BDC4-207911C0E823Q35463248-1019FCFA-7AD2-4E5D-840C-09454D4A6670Q35527715-5676CC3F-4859-41B3-B900-96C568AA81F3Q35628424-7465E1F2-08AD-46B2-A734-62EF4BEC2B8DQ35628467-09C01376-090E-4BBC-8D46-14F97E326257Q35742952-E130E88E-5BAD-4090-B2E0-868184E95410Q35778836-3FD81EE3-A4A4-4F61-B253-D2E535C08202Q35779509-3F19C9F7-DEB1-4E73-B4E5-36F930D0D286Q35840175-787E0A6F-5C14-4FC6-880B-46A25C3890F9Q35916790-9C7CA8B0-0233-4C9E-B9F6-29CF6EB30B69Q35950818-6E38BBDE-5389-47CB-8573-2B0300D3FAB1Q36145423-FC2848C2-019F-4F49-825F-DDE1756ABAD9Q36372129-352B5CD7-934D-4A99-AE83-01BA1E8E2DC8Q36393314-CDFDCB88-0374-4090-BFAA-9270B41D516AQ36481288-05AFF9CB-93C7-43FD-A256-8808AB985541Q36609121-903D8F21-F053-4C4F-AFA5-92C212329871Q36672040-337782BD-D11B-4B32-9793-4150030E3BD3Q36672166-23E073E9-1FBE-4EC7-86EA-9DA1DD0DABA2Q36861962-F75DFE2E-E16D-491E-BB98-29D3860F4C91Q36929294-9A8A296A-8771-4340-85EC-436F571E52ECQ37044979-C844B3C4-1555-4B93-AB1B-9B0E518AC900Q37265772-C5C449B2-CD72-4A17-A8D9-042E99FC32B2
P2860
description
1993 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1993年の論文
@ja
1993年学术文章
@wuu
1993年学术文章
@zh-cn
1993年学术文章
@zh-hans
1993年学术文章
@zh-my
1993年学术文章
@zh-sg
1993年學術文章
@yue
1993年學術文章
@zh
1993年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance.
@en
type
label
Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance.
@en
prefLabel
Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance.
@en
P2093
P1476
Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance.
@en
P2093
E B Larson
J D Carline
J P LoGerfo
M D Wenrich
P G Ramsey
P304
P356
10.1001/JAMA.1993.03500130069034
P407
P577
1993-04-01T00:00:00Z