Peer review of the quality of care. Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments.
about
Profiling quality of care: Is there a role for peer review?Quality of care assessment in geriatric evaluation and management units: construction of a chart review tool for a tracer condition.A new implicit review instrument for measuring quality of care delivered to pediatric patients in the emergency departmentAppropriateness of the decision to transfer nursing facility residents to the hospital.Bioethics for clinicians: 23. Disclosure of medical error.Using structured implicit review to assess quality of care in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)The doctor-patient relationship and HIV-infected patients' satisfaction with primary care physicians.Performance assessment. Family physicians in Montreal meet the mark!The reliability of assessing the appropriateness of requested diagnostic tests.Assessment of family physicians' performance using patient charts: interrater reliability and concordance with chart-stimulated recall interview.Determining the number of patient charts necessary for a reliable assessment of practicing family physicians' performance.Assessing individual clinical performance: a primer for physicians.Lapses in safety in end-stage renal disease patients admitted to surgical services.Researching the reliability of accreditation survey teams: lessons learnt when things went awry.A survey of radiation treatment planning peer-review activities in a provincial radiation oncology programme: current practice and future directions.Implicit Review Instrument to Evaluate Quality of Care Delivered by Physicians to Children in Emergency Departments.Regarding "Implicit Review Instrument to Evaluate Quality of Care Delivered by Physicians to Children in Emergency Departments".Development and evaluation of a standardized peer-training in the context of peer review for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation.
P2860
Q24796419-F8AE4B8A-B00E-4E1B-AF2B-9B6BE4877FC1Q30489435-0483A439-66AE-4AE1-8C4F-BFA315FB29F3Q33294929-083A4303-273E-4EB6-97EE-3E835E83AEFFQ33842964-5F3AECC7-E004-451A-A1DF-5811B1B7E942Q33955297-0DA91DBA-181B-4E8A-B0E0-D9FD6A67DF39Q34020851-14E852A6-A750-4356-ADD5-FEF59CA206D5Q34745885-1AB631BE-82B8-4D4B-A935-3AB7E2A4BC54Q34850341-407A79CE-77EA-4EFE-98B7-A844C3DE91AEQ35065035-D9F3C267-DD4A-4A9A-9B4A-B49D8C6DDE63Q36994842-E776E350-EB87-47CE-98DF-75FD34588192Q37694103-FC0DF767-B60E-4109-B182-43D46983EACBQ37713981-A6E552EC-0344-47E8-888C-88C9939BA687Q37958104-91BE6830-A197-446D-AB09-6F74872CC62EQ38103837-808EAC71-E270-47F6-A36B-545FAD4A9C52Q38125612-C812E50F-0369-4FC7-ABAE-039AD7C0344AQ46220865-042B9CE9-21C4-486D-BA2A-1E3340751BD5Q48294873-4FF128BF-1838-421E-B9DA-DC6549CACA93Q55411401-B51377BC-4B99-4C01-9DC3-96CE9B522FA3
P2860
Peer review of the quality of care. Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments.
description
1997 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1997年の論文
@ja
1997年学术文章
@wuu
1997年学术文章
@zh-cn
1997年学术文章
@zh-hans
1997年学术文章
@zh-my
1997年学术文章
@zh-sg
1997年學術文章
@yue
1997年學術文章
@zh
1997年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Peer review of the quality of ...... tcome and process assessments.
@en
type
label
Peer review of the quality of ...... tcome and process assessments.
@en
prefLabel
Peer review of the quality of ...... tcome and process assessments.
@en
P2093
P1476
Peer review of the quality of ...... tcome and process assessments.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1001/JAMA.1997.03550190037041
P407
P577
1997-11-01T00:00:00Z