Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
about
Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic reviewRobot-assisted surgery in gynaecologyRobotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancerRobotic surgery for benign gynaecological diseaseSurgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological diseaseRobotic surgery for benign gynaecological diseaseRobotic surgery for benign gynaecological diseaseProceedings from the Third National Institutes of Health International Congress on Advances in Uterine Leiomyoma Research: comprehensive review, conference summary and future recommendationsRobotic Surgery in GynecologyRobotics in Gynecology: Why is this Technology Worth Pursuing?Review of Robotic Surgery in Gynecology-The Future Is Here.Perioperative surgical outcome of conventional and robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomyThree-dimensional laparoscopy: Principles and practice.Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.An economic analysis of robotically assisted hysterectomy.Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.Abdominal Colpopexy: Comparison of Endoscopic Surgical Strategies (ACCESS).Robot-assisted hysterectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches: systematic review and meta-analysis.Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy.Robotic surgery in gynecology.Robotics for Pelvic ReconstructionComparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.Are costs of robot-assisted surgery warranted for gynecological procedures?Robotic-assisted laparoscopic management of ureteral endometriosis.Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.Cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery for rectal cancer focusing on short-term outcomes: a propensity score-matching analysis.Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Morcellation Compared With Abdominal Hysterectomy for Presumed Myomas.Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches.Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease.Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study.Full robot-assisted gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis produces satisfying outcomes.Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015)Pedagogic Approach in the Surgical Learning: The First Period of "Assistant Surgeon" May Improve the Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Robotic-Assisted HysterectomyEffect of a disposable automated suturing device on cost and operating room time in benign total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.Uterine fibroids and current clinical challenges.Indian experience of robotics in gynecologyEconomic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review.Robot-assisted surgery:--impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.The current status of robotic oncologic surgery.The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.
P2860
Q21296750-C352F5DF-8701-4B52-AE1A-A9F145EEF674Q24187376-97B4A972-E84C-4473-A9F9-8C911FA7A1E8Q24187513-93F7F934-7FBC-4717-9D53-D04BD06A28BAQ24187518-609DB678-1853-4133-A74E-BA4870BE3F98Q24187905-6E5274FB-D29D-453D-8DE7-B7917C91631DQ24203642-DBAA90D2-7EC0-4F35-A4B2-35A27868D4EEQ24234389-8A9022FD-F6BE-4214-8599-38D5BE28A789Q24567733-608F010B-5155-4B8E-B7EA-E39BD5933A07Q26747236-9F4B583B-2782-41A5-B385-4C3795BD9BABQ26827253-DAF30D09-6477-4169-A0E4-8F09F6DB5EB3Q33633406-0E6109C9-CD02-4073-98ED-FDF73970BDCBQ33715505-32937F3B-3D8D-4169-8AFB-FD9046F499FBQ33837969-65875D5C-ED45-464F-B35B-1AE9AB53CC2AQ33941572-908FB911-B819-4ECF-A59D-7B0BC66C0D05Q34089701-3BA4F3C8-0089-44C6-8519-0F568C2253DBQ34259038-B380CCB2-1901-477D-BF05-0D91D611A3B4Q34372059-B9AF9604-044F-4859-82E9-E861B136145EQ34537423-6B16D4C8-4604-40E0-A0C7-EE254A31AA82Q34625098-49DC5F2D-E119-4978-9E4C-EA7DA66B0BB6Q34908673-A456C0BE-96EA-43BA-A5B0-97E6BCF3AADEQ35180312-5E48682C-2A79-4EB7-841C-15BCF499665DQ35180705-67C06222-CB20-407F-A2AD-95DA7C947BF4Q35219320-BAB47E2F-5936-4EA0-A39A-E9856B579286Q35244771-8716CBD3-E0C5-4731-8951-75FC1E1A9E84Q35948624-0EADA187-31A6-4713-8CAA-CD65CE4EDE3CQ36193705-AE2963D2-E41D-4E92-A8F2-29ECBD576A43Q36553799-6B8C223B-4D27-4A45-AD5E-744A6A5FBBCBQ36573470-B1A4EBFB-AE4A-4BE0-92EB-5F1B1377A3B6Q36871314-B279739E-6321-4E0B-8CB5-8710E08C7F9BQ36894012-E87A9C1F-ADC0-4482-B49A-EC9C05403B40Q37241511-37962270-7B56-4210-B7C7-ACC0FAAD8A41Q37272670-4B24899D-04EA-4D0A-9466-3A3E38E83532Q37385556-1AEB3295-1EA9-45FA-8898-BD48E5B24498Q37399135-E4062E59-34EE-4D35-9B3F-EF6F2E9552BBQ37437333-E59181F5-05B3-4E29-881D-23FC2142F41BQ37718582-41BE6F32-11D9-4149-B7F6-E602BE886A98Q37945105-3725A12A-04AB-4AD8-8A83-6A5231F83B34Q38013657-2CC64860-1106-4426-94E5-063E9095D089Q38060651-EF85471F-D905-4C1F-A949-968B7D6A6F15Q38120481-61A1760F-0571-4BF7-8D32-8CE5AF4A65B4
P2860
Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
2010年學術文章
@zh
2010年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Robotic hysterectomy versus co ...... a matched case-control study.
@en
Robotic hysterectomy versus co ...... a matched case-control study.
@nl
type
label
Robotic hysterectomy versus co ...... a matched case-control study.
@en
Robotic hysterectomy versus co ...... a matched case-control study.
@nl
prefLabel
Robotic hysterectomy versus co ...... a matched case-control study.
@en
Robotic hysterectomy versus co ...... a matched case-control study.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Robotic hysterectomy versus co ...... a matched case-control study.
@en
P2093
Dimitri Sarlos
Gabriel Schaer
Lavonne Kots
Nebojsa Stevanovic
P356
10.1016/J.EJOGRB.2010.02.012
P577
2010-03-05T00:00:00Z