Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy.
about
Governing the research-care divide in clinical biobanking: Dutch perspectivesReflecting on earlier experiences with unsolicited findings: points to consider for next-generation sequencing and informed consent in diagnosticsPublic preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysisWhen Children Become Adults: Should Biobanks Re-Contact?Dynamics and ethics of comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing: a review of the challengesFeedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: Is It Feasible in Europe?Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?Ethical and legal implications of whole genome and whole exome sequencing in African populations.Following the giant's paces-governance issues and bioethical reflections in China.Data sharing in stem cell translational science: policy statement by the International Stem Cell Forum Ethics Working Party.Self-guided management of exome and whole-genome sequencing results: changing the results return model.Amnestic MCI Patients' Perspectives toward Disclosure of Amyloid PET Results in a Research Context.Genome sequencing and carrier testing: decisions on categorization and whether to disclose results of carrier testing.A framework for analyzing the ethics of disclosing genetic research findings.Experiences and attitudes of genome investigators regarding return of individual genetic test results.Inclusion of residual tissue in biobanks: opt-in or opt-out?Informed consent for exome sequencing in diagnostics: exploring first experiences and views of professionals and patients.Use of next generation sequencing technologies in research and beyond: are participants with mental health disorders fully protected?You never call, you never write: why return of 'omic' results to research participants is both a good idea and a moral imperative.Paediatric research and the communication of not-so incidental findingsPersonalized assent for pediatric biobanks.Funding considerations for the disclosure of genetic incidental findings in biobank research.Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting.Timing and context: important considerations in the return of genetic results to research participants.Preferences for genetic testing for colorectal cancer within a population-based screening program: a discrete choice experimentBeneficence, clinical urgency, and the return of individual research results to relativesPaediatric biobanking: Dutch experts reflecting on appropriate legal standards for practice.Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.Disclosure of individual pharmacogenomic results in research projects: when and what kind of information to return to research participants.Disclosure of incidental findings in cancer genomic research: investigators' perceptions on obligations and barriers.Whole-exome sequencing in pediatrics: parents' considerations toward return of unsolicited findings for their child.Unsolicited findings of next-generation sequencing for tumor analysis within a Dutch consortium: clinical daily practice reconsidered.A clinical utility study of exome sequencing versus conventional genetic testing in pediatric neurologyEthical considerations of neuro-oncology trial design in the era of precision medicine.Participants' Role Expectations in Genetics Research and Re-consent: Revising the Theory and Methods of Mental Models Research Relating to Roles.A tiered-layered-staged model for informed consent in personal genome testing.Evaluating a counselling strategy for diagnostic WES in paediatric neurology: an exploration of parents' information and communication needs.A thick opt-out is often sufficient.Disclosure and management of research findings in stem cell research and banking: policy statement.Amnestic MCI patients' experiences after disclosure of their amyloid PET result in a research context.
P2860
Q26798331-FFBF60BF-82B8-4EA2-B65B-386BC0FC14C9Q27023696-D745CAF6-DBBD-4D0B-8F9F-D5608394E8B5Q27324226-BF715258-8222-4AD6-BFCC-025D9D0578B7Q28080169-636E128E-1933-4B00-B407-D9460E7E976AQ28286723-952F63BE-871F-4421-A342-59C4344C068DQ28601041-3A97732D-D488-4F7F-8BF0-5F4978CE7C50Q28650987-2194025A-F2F7-4873-AD44-884F2F3E6D18Q28684652-E5CBA215-1E4A-4CE1-B55C-3597491831C8Q30390301-9BD638DD-F3FE-44AC-A31B-3C981C4B821FQ31011836-0ABADAEE-A30E-46AB-8849-3914E4594E33Q33566296-70D92DEF-78B9-4081-912A-80BCB0A9889CQ33840562-399D88BC-6137-4B27-ABC3-CF04EC08A7F6Q33902567-340A7037-D38E-4DD4-B660-459B0631D94DQ34081010-F2F9FF7C-3B4E-40BA-ABB6-BAE9E407BB4CQ34084171-D4D28213-6144-4EB7-9C56-1968DEF338FBQ34382331-93D0181A-1B66-4AEA-81B5-C660AD35F51DQ34507484-B4A216E4-5A34-403A-B3E4-E5C96D67E039Q34519211-4A501A50-B744-4E97-94CC-4BC8AB421A0BQ35627358-A4619E2E-CC57-4FA7-A0E9-134FE5C5FA7CQ36054009-D0B03B19-9120-4737-B4F3-9F56778A4FD7Q36161881-244EFD0C-D0DB-465E-AB95-04448E31D21CQ36349232-9453B53B-9696-4277-A11C-E5838EE5CBEDQ36468074-3DCBED06-CC50-456B-A9B6-751CCFF2E8C5Q36470928-6B28DBA1-3DD5-4827-8338-BD7E0EB605B8Q36585023-BC36A901-6E7B-43A3-B743-86CD1481E90FQ37017693-AD19C1DE-02CF-4FCC-B0DB-9A67FB8AB7BBQ37568772-156AE18B-1A34-49D2-947C-0EC5B37A181FQ37595586-180A4DB0-A5C8-4EAB-BD99-735BB1277CD9Q38097535-31C9569A-B95B-406F-A349-23C980675B11Q38393316-01B2DA79-270E-4315-88B4-EAC358696855Q38837649-DBE29B9F-516A-49AB-9318-FA4E62883A0DQ38882097-0F5E4EA8-5E21-4A6F-88CD-8A1115D35273Q38883296-7B1AACC2-5412-45FC-9F96-1E5EF1FED144Q39337327-58D2FD37-EF5A-4A61-AC7A-84793A1D03EDQ40571766-310C0D67-6C22-487D-8F5A-5F5A1EADFE11Q40833971-6C812800-7A2B-4B7A-A386-0A6B8FF56C0AQ41009411-37042070-710D-4A21-BF8B-05DDD33E1913Q43819948-5C8E9565-E992-4B63-A04C-D8E98C16AA5EQ46015256-9F153F4C-3B17-43A5-8CC7-C3DA80B2B492Q47115002-FD4ECCD8-FBAA-453F-B957-0A50562BB07E
P2860
Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年学术文章
@wuu
2011年学术文章
@zh
2011年学术文章
@zh-cn
2011年学术文章
@zh-hans
2011年学术文章
@zh-my
2011年学术文章
@zh-sg
2011年學術文章
@yue
2011年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Feedback of individual genetic ...... a qualified disclosure policy.
@en
Feedback of individual genetic ...... a qualified disclosure policy.
@nl
type
label
Feedback of individual genetic ...... a qualified disclosure policy.
@en
Feedback of individual genetic ...... a qualified disclosure policy.
@nl
prefLabel
Feedback of individual genetic ...... a qualified disclosure policy.
@en
Feedback of individual genetic ...... a qualified disclosure policy.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Feedback of individual genetic ...... a qualified disclosure policy.
@en
P2093
Johannes J M Van Delden
N Charlotte Onland-Moret
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/HUMU.21518
P577
2011-06-30T00:00:00Z