Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter? - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?

Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q47305984

about

Spine surgery--approach size does matter.Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Attractive Option for Select Failed Backs.

P2860

Q47284851-363A3D61-90A6-427B-9227-5ED87BB701C9 Q54941099-0C2095C8-974B-4AED-9A6C-D30695EA038A

P2860

Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q47305984

description

2012 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2012年の論文

@ja

2012年学术文章

@wuu

2012年学术文章

@zh

2012年学术文章

@zh-cn

2012年学术文章

@zh-hans

2012年学术文章

@zh-my

2012年学术文章

@zh-sg

2012年學術文章

@yue

2012年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?

@en

Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?

@nl

type

label

Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?

@en

Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?

@nl

prefLabel

Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?

@en

Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?

@nl

P1433

Q47305984-1B954593-B11D-4651-87E6-E792FC8FDC8D

P1476

Q47305984-2C4B9273-7141-4B3E-88EB-BBB0AEBC9ACE

P2093

Q47305984-652AE231-57A4-454E-8E39-225C1E55D4A3

P2860

Q47305984-23106A48-F49E-4767-BC5F-6532B899D523

Q47305984-3B567F5A-A311-4F69-BD2A-C6EA6FCDB6B0

Q47305984-686B8CA3-B8EB-4D90-91DB-1CEE455CD423

Q47305984-AF9EC9DE-6AE8-445B-A081-8949797DBB8A

Q47305984-B9D9C2D6-21E7-46EE-B650-B2A29856764B

Q47305984-DDA8A548-8256-4741-B803-732A8FE2141D

P2888

Q47305984-E2D6001B-618D-47F0-8BEC-A2E38082EFBA

P304

Q47305984-49F0967C-8BED-470D-BC80-06500E25177E

P31

Q47305984-FFA2B9E9-BC6F-47DF-A007-53D533E0F7AF

P356

Q47305984-03541913-712D-4481-BF08-F3C98B947254

P407

Q47305984-F91889AC-7490-47A7-9AFA-7918F3137760

P433

Q47305984-B6B3A5DA-C1A0-4D5E-8E6E-28FC2C468C83

P478

Q47305984-465B3302-EC80-400F-8CF8-DCB4558206DC

P577

Q47305984-CE84A4EE-BE82-4F18-92CD-31E7BBDA7B59

P698

Q47305984-784CF553-D947-4D5A-A9D2-20FF19209EF4

P356

NRNEUROL.2012.113

P1433

Nature Reviews Neurology

P1476

Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?

@en

P2093

Richard Mannion

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial

Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica.

The use of expertise-based randomized controlled trials to assess spinal manipulation and acupuncture for low back pain: a systematic review.

Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain.

Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial.

Tubular Diskectomy vs Conventional Microdiskectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disk Herniation: 2-Year Results of a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

P2888

nrneurol.2012.113

P304

363-365

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1038/NRNEUROL.2012.113

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

7

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2012-06-05T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

22664786

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string