Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial.
about
Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosisMinimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniationRehabilitation after lumbar disc surgeryMinimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniationSurgical techniques for sciatica due to herniated disc, a systematic reviewSystematic review of microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniationIncidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported OutcomesMinimally invasive versus open surgery for cervical and lumbar discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Function after spinal treatment, exercise and rehabilitation (FASTER): improving the functional outcome of spinal surgery.The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial.Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery (REALISE): design of a randomised controlled trialFeasibility and efficacy of percutaneous lateral lumbar discectomy in the treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation: a preliminary experience.Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: Technique and results of 188 cases.The safety and efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials.Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation.Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer.Percutaneous laser disc decompression versus conventional microdiscectomy for patients with sciatica: Two-year results of a randomised controlled trial.Extent of intraoperative muscle dissection does not affect long-term outcomes after minimally invasive surgery versus open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery: A prospective longitudinal cohort study.LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION.The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device.Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial.The Morphometric Study of Degenerative Lateral Canal Stenosis at L4-L5 and L5-S1 Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): Feasibility Analysis for Posterior Surgical Decompression."Minimally invasive" lumbar spine surgery: a critical review.Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Minimally Invasive versus Open Spine Surgery: What Does the Best Evidence Tell Us?Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.Long-term follow-up of standard microdiscectomy versus minimal access surgery for lumbar disc herniations.Microdiscectomy or tubular discectomy: Is any of them a better option for management of lumbar disc prolapse.The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.Inefficacy interim monitoring procedures in randomized clinical trials: the need to report.Primary limited lumbar discectomy with an annulus closure device: one-year clinical and radiographic results from a prospective, multi-center study.Timing and minimal access surgery for sciatica: a summary of two randomized trials.Day case lumbar discectomy--viable option in the UK?PTED study: design of a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar dSpine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?Percutaneous laser disc decompression versus microdiscectomy for sciatica: Cost utility analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial.Tubular microscopes discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for treating lumbar disk herniation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
P2860
Q24187321-54F5C1AA-A8F8-40DB-AF64-C9359F0C3D51Q24193796-F445F959-CA78-4452-A42E-4FE9380B8AA1Q24197940-A7F9DDFD-331C-44F4-A07D-97EBD5948229Q24201945-44E24946-CA4E-4795-B1EC-188532A94389Q24623485-6F8A26AD-6F36-4AC3-9379-E155330FE10EQ26821881-89EA1482-3826-4A94-80A9-1B60CC908530Q27004239-8717593F-8DAD-42F3-B9A6-CD5B6B60A898Q30604276-D9E20122-281D-47D5-9E2A-5BBD7854E80CQ33526677-416AFC2D-D284-4C13-B09B-B834429EBB3AQ33589314-43A485A6-208C-4D6C-A414-B4030F9C1711Q34485527-5DFED694-2A06-4092-8AA2-DA4C6360D64BQ34562395-9A7F2710-6813-4661-9B7D-2156440701F2Q34656795-81BC780B-48E7-4F26-9AF0-94C30E696322Q35073010-9A39ABFD-B6A0-450D-A212-14E8126CDA63Q35112211-E078F69B-BBB1-46B6-9DC9-FAC0791939EFQ35145684-FB2C2EA4-08CA-4E46-96AE-123850E9ED20Q35823375-F5996281-8B29-4AAC-A573-324F33B2F540Q35927006-A5D93102-0611-4F66-8D3B-7727FB589B11Q36358386-B1F0AB08-55E6-4887-9422-DFAFF9BF2C41Q36460738-E8FD48A0-E749-47AA-8354-8E6A4790A409Q36703907-509AB248-86F8-4FCE-BB63-9D6CA5EDDBE3Q36852403-80282305-7B28-4B6C-9F15-7B4B68E06578Q37503616-5DBD30C6-6341-40E0-A487-4D85EE4D7BBFQ37698531-F9AB1388-9944-4CCE-BD6E-ACBD6CFD06F8Q37870826-FA610914-EF88-4689-B8A4-D8CC83695986Q38019766-0BB4D6CD-C858-4CB3-A8B0-F01E31FF55CBQ38179971-3F80D50B-F033-4FFD-A04E-DF32588174BCQ39155996-8B734FE8-E9CF-4FBF-8E8E-B1CE23C40E16Q39211261-19C56E4F-D3B9-4074-9732-391BD5726C7FQ39218793-40954850-D540-4FED-BFA2-E948C63903B8Q39388244-541F02A6-ACBC-4510-89E2-048ED06A8201Q39641412-57229C95-AD87-41F8-A9F0-389E1A77E2DEQ39772400-5226CB83-4594-4BBB-900F-497261820995Q40635895-5017BC90-738F-4995-A606-3C19D5098FC7Q42716690-C783595F-759B-47EA-90CE-DCC1DADB8CB3Q43595025-FAF86892-09E6-4385-BFC6-E4F152A9582AQ47256310-9FBC0F91-3100-468A-B422-8F9A9513CCC5Q47305984-B9D9C2D6-21E7-46EE-B650-B2A29856764BQ47556918-86B49BCE-F91B-4AB0-B3A1-BCBEFE491F3EQ47702338-39A27A22-AE7A-4FEA-99B7-AB4EB3F40197
P2860
Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
2009年论文
@zh
2009年论文
@zh-cn
name
Tubular diskectomy vs conventi ...... a randomized controlled trial.
@en
type
label
Tubular diskectomy vs conventi ...... a randomized controlled trial.
@en
prefLabel
Tubular diskectomy vs conventi ...... a randomized controlled trial.
@en
P2093
P356
P1476
Tubular diskectomy vs conventi ...... a randomized controlled trial.
@en
P2093
Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group (SIPS)
M Elske van den Akker
Mark P Arts
Ronald Brand
Ronald H M A Bartels
Wilco C Peul
P304
P356
10.1001/JAMA.2009.972
P407
P50
P577
2009-07-01T00:00:00Z