Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature.

about

The study design elements employed by researchers in preclinical animal experiments from two research domains and implications for automation of systematic reviews.

P2860

Q55514649-63CC0594-58B5-43AF-943D-0EFF25BA7170

P2860

Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q47657080

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年学术文章

@wuu

2017年学术文章

@zh-cn

2017年学术文章

@zh-hans

2017年学术文章

@zh-my

2017年学术文章

@zh-sg

2017年學術文章

@yue

2017年學術文章

@zh

2017年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature.

@en

Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature.

@nl

type

Item

label

Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature.

@en

Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature.

@nl

prefLabel

Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature.

@en

Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature.

@nl

P1476

Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature.

@en

P2093

Andrew Rice

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Emily Sena

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

James Thomas

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jing Liao

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sophia Ananiadou

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Thomas Ottavi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Zsanett Bahor

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P275

Creative Commons Attribution

P2860

Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research

Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste

Topic detection using paragraph vectors to support active learning in systematic reviews

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research

Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience

Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?

Methodological Rigor in Preclinical Cardiovascular Studies: Targets to Enhance Reproducibility and Promote Research Translation

Reducing systematic review workload through certainty-based screening.

P304

2525-2532

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

review article

P356

10.1042/CS20160722

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

English

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

131

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Kimberley E. Wever

David Howells

Alexandra Bannach-Brown

Sarah K McCann

Malcolm Macleod

P5008

ScienceSource

P577

2017-10-12T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

2017-10-15T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

29026002

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

cerebral infarction

AVC

Middle cerebral artery syndrome

cerebrovascular disease

brain ischemia

bias

P932

5869854

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature.

about

P2860

P2860

Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P275

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P407

P433

P478

P50

P5008

P577

P698

P921

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P275

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P407

P433

P478

P50

P5008

P577

P698

P921

P932