A comparison of WMT, CARB, and TOMM failure rates in non-head injury disability claimants.
about
Auditory memory decrements, without dissimulation, among patients with major depressive disorder.The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test forced-choice recognition task: Base-rate data and norms.Base-rate data and norms for the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Embedded Performance Validity Indicator.Effort in college undergraduates is sufficient on the word memory testAdjudication of fibromyalgia syndrome: challenges in the medicolegal arena.A comparison of four embedded validity indices for the RBANS in a memory disorders clinic.Factor Analysis of the MSVT, NV-MSVT, and RBANS Memory Subtests.Has the rolling uterus finally gathered moss? Somatization and malingering of cognitive deficit in six cases of "toxic mold" exposure.Ethical issues associated with the assessment of exaggeration, poor effort, and malingering.The test validation summary.Is the Rey 15-Item Memory Test II (Rey II) a valid symptom validity test?: comparison with the TOMM.Assessment of effort in children: a systematic review.Cognitive impairment and evaluation in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: an integrated cognitive-emotional approach.Expansion and re-examination of Digit Span effort indices on the WAIS-IV.Differential sensitivity of the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and MMPI-2 validity scales to memory complaints.Comparison of the Morel Emotional Numbing Test for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder to the Word Memory Test in neuropsychological evaluations.Examining the Test Of Memory Malingering Trial 1 and Word Memory Test Immediate Recognition as screening tools for insufficient effort.Hit rates of adequate performance based on the test of memory malingering (TOMM) Trial 1.Performance on the Test of Memory Malingering is predicted by the number of errors on its first 10 items on an inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit.Neuropsychological test validity in Veterans presenting with subjective complaints of 'very severe' cognitive symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury.Derivation and clinical validation of consistency indices on the test of memory malingering.Enhancing neuropsychological performance in chronic cannabis users: the role of motivation.Symptom exaggeration by college adults in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder assessments.A Factor Analytic Approach to the Validation of the Word Memory Test and Test of Memory Malingering as Measures of Effort and Not Memory.Rates of False-Positive Classification Resulting From the Analysis of Additional Embedded Performance Validity Measures.Symptom validity testing in memory clinics: Hippocampal-memory associations and relevance for diagnosing mild cognitive impairment.Children and the test of memory malingering: is one trial enough?Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2.[Formula: see text]inadequate effort on neuropsychological evaluation is associated with increased healthcare utilization.Utility of the Rey-15 recognition trial to detect invalid performance in a forensic neuropsychological sample.Poor performance validity predicts clinical characteristics and cognitive test performance of OEF/OIF/OND Veterans in a research setting.Performance on Standard Indexes of Effort Among Patients With Dementia.Ecological validity of performance validity testing.Test of memory malingering with children: The utility of Trial 1 and TOMMe10 as screeners of test validity.Validity of the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR): effort considered in a clinical sample of U.S. military veterans.Influence of poor effort on neuropsychological test performance in U.S. military personnel following mild traumatic brain injury.A comparison of insufficient effort rates, neuropsychological functioning, and neuropsychiatric symptom reporting in military veterans and civilians with chronic traumatic brain injury.Symptom validity test performance in U.S. veterans referred for evaluation of mild TBI.Are embedded validity indices equivalent to free-standing symptom validity tests?Correlates of invalid neuropsychological test performance after traumatic brain injury.
P2860
Q30465034-3C944114-B0A9-4871-A166-AC788252F516Q31011987-0101553B-4B2C-4F20-B3BB-E503A7EBF755Q31123506-12F7B86E-0CBC-426F-9C96-2C71B457A398Q34683600-9FD977B9-85DF-4BD3-879A-0C338E3D13C5Q34756165-00E3CFB4-F999-4D1D-ADF4-E4C913369EE4Q35580007-363206F7-A80B-4036-8B7B-1C4F71CD9570Q36042107-AFF788F7-8ED6-4F37-8161-4171A28243F3Q36596200-BC1D6CC9-5D1A-43D9-8593-F086DEC29E20Q36607252-8ECC959C-4126-4E71-B2DF-D6C579E388CCQ37288211-1AF53064-6B86-47BF-A841-C64D5CDBB717Q37331359-DE00151F-9643-4271-973D-4E85638ABD57Q38171838-2C6AB23B-743D-48B8-8FB6-6C7D47AF8FD3Q38381070-24C8A1DE-F3F5-477D-984C-7267B350D553Q38405730-59DB18A1-ED0A-4561-B820-0DAF7EB961A6Q38425818-9C71565C-5C57-43E1-A5C8-B0BD9FC0C533Q38430418-FDFC6F1E-1494-447A-9488-40494F1F7191Q38430917-99EE84E0-26E2-45E8-91DF-0702E7D4E202Q38443423-6EC3B088-B651-494C-A67A-A068C5133D02Q38639490-A847237D-AE11-4D51-AFAA-0ED5A66BED89Q39209869-C9B36FF5-963E-4809-994C-8009D1D58190Q39296073-F266DF92-E234-420A-A362-D1B202576377Q39660541-8A752B27-1044-4DDF-A060-ED66C9CE8CECQ40175399-EBFFBC9D-A2DD-47B3-98EB-0C484698FD16Q40950102-3E9563F9-80BD-4078-866A-3E852FD992B2Q41588733-9C02AFB1-A4B1-461B-99EF-BC218D887732Q43444955-6065D1CE-ACD7-4F90-999D-6936C11607B0Q44040180-8504050A-6259-47F2-884B-869C74E8BB7CQ44061407-7F551B12-9AF5-42BB-95ED-D866E9116C1FQ44062578-28E0EFA7-CDCB-41E4-A4F8-0149CF43ABF6Q44192116-864A892F-5489-4ECA-9C8E-6E860B9AC7C1Q44563117-32E1E655-82B8-4BFC-821C-E91E18C63F4EQ44665252-29719237-594E-47FD-A496-AD61FE7D2E56Q44894986-6CBC724B-90C4-4052-83AA-1FED90CD59F3Q45014319-2F88D654-BE60-4A1E-9EE3-EF440FA3590DQ45279987-62CDE64A-DF6B-4957-836F-5EE57C326805Q45324620-A4DAA7B2-B8AD-478E-A81F-7454E33EB2C2Q45329253-D59182C9-65E7-4BB3-9820-CFDB5D081206Q45331209-93FC0E71-E5F1-4D19-981A-A4A9045FEE2CQ45718944-31D3B27A-FBC7-4D90-8207-C8BF8FCA5D4BQ46004671-DE595983-84CF-4B55-941B-D87401B9E1A1
P2860
A comparison of WMT, CARB, and TOMM failure rates in non-head injury disability claimants.
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年学术文章
@wuu
2004年学术文章
@zh
2004年学术文章
@zh-cn
2004年学术文章
@zh-hans
2004年学术文章
@zh-my
2004年学术文章
@zh-sg
2004年學術文章
@yue
2004年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A comparison of WMT, CARB, and ...... d injury disability claimants.
@en
A comparison of WMT, CARB, and ...... d injury disability claimants.
@nl
type
label
A comparison of WMT, CARB, and ...... d injury disability claimants.
@en
A comparison of WMT, CARB, and ...... d injury disability claimants.
@nl
prefLabel
A comparison of WMT, CARB, and ...... d injury disability claimants.
@en
A comparison of WMT, CARB, and ...... d injury disability claimants.
@nl
P2093
P1476
A comparison of WMT, CARB, and ...... d injury disability claimants.
@en
P2093
Martin L Rohling
Paul Green
Roger O Gervais
Wendy Ford
P304
P356
10.1016/J.ACN.2003.05.001
P577
2004-06-01T00:00:00Z