The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics.
about
Agreement among response to intervention criteria for identifying responder statusSpeech disfluencies of preschool-age children who do and do not stutter.Selecting At-Risk First-Grade Readers for Early Intervention: Eliminating False Positives and Exploring the Promise of a Two-Stage Gated Screening Process.Risk assessment and decision making about in-labour transfer from rural maternity care: a social judgment and signal detection analysis.Assessing diagnostic accuracy in veterinary imaging.Two-stage screening for math problem-solving difficulty using dynamic assessment of algebraic learningThe validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health.First-grade cognitive abilities as long-term predictors of reading comprehension and disability status.Should we trust our judgments about the proficiency of Motivational Interviewing counselors? A glimpse at the impact of low inter-rater reliability.Using the AUDIT-PC to predict alcohol withdrawal in hospitalized patients.Is a Positive Developmental-Behavioral Screening Score Sufficient to Justify Referral? A Review of Evidence and Theory.The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior at zero, fifty, and one hundred.Construct validity of the misrepresentation scales of the psychological screening inventory.Application of decision theory to DUI assessment.Error management theory and the adaptive significance of transgenerational maternal-stress effects on offspring phenotypeHuman susceptibility to social influence and its neural correlates are related to perceived vulnerability to extrinsic morbidity risks
P2860
Q28303986-C684B926-280B-4504-8758-ECF124C13880Q33723670-5AFD1AFD-E758-4DA2-8D2E-62741CE3AFCBQ34034173-403D1D1A-537D-4633-99D6-00362049C488Q34462976-725CFC19-F4EE-4FC2-A303-F30C78820E6CQ34958122-5F110D0C-CCB5-4410-AFE0-7BAA7D8331D5Q35256059-E3757359-FCED-4E32-9D8D-665556EC2DF7Q35802044-BC97F14B-1FFA-497F-A801-45302353D934Q36054400-D44D44C0-B80B-41C1-BD0E-3566E715DABCQ37226798-5AAEAB62-15B3-4666-A497-0F1A8D75FB02Q37471390-1101A391-5C29-4A61-AC99-11F5A3ECD8A9Q39175195-55261FB8-9682-45BB-B45E-89DDF2E30B18Q40114076-789A2A50-1E0C-47D5-8592-D16BB19DF8F0Q48474252-FF9DBEA4-243D-4906-8F91-586CF7DA7985Q52890812-27757B7E-685F-4830-A4B2-A18CAB5C1593Q57179189-C51C4E3F-66C8-4BC5-B876-F3DAA75FAA0DQ58762042-AD56A378-7446-41F6-85C5-61BFA86389E9
P2860
The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics.
description
1992 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1992年の論文
@ja
1992年学术文章
@wuu
1992年学术文章
@zh
1992年学术文章
@zh-cn
1992年学术文章
@zh-hans
1992年学术文章
@zh-my
1992年学术文章
@zh-sg
1992年學術文章
@yue
1992年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics.
@en
The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics.
@nl
type
label
The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics.
@en
The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics.
@nl
prefLabel
The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics.
@en
The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics.
@nl
P1476
The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1037//0003-066X.47.4.522
P577
1992-04-01T00:00:00Z