Adjusting for selection effects in epidemiologic studies: why sensitivity analysis is the only "solution".
about
Are all biases missing data problems?National HIV prevalence estimates for sub-Saharan Africa: controlling selection bias with Heckman-type selection modelsSelection bias modeling using observed data augmented with imputed record-level probabilities.Validation, replication, and sensitivity testing of Heckman-type selection models to adjust estimates of HIV prevalence.Adjusting HIV prevalence estimates for non-participation: an application to demographic surveillanceDo Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons?: Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey.On the assumption of bivariate normality in selection models: a Copula approach applied to estimating HIV prevalenceAssessment of potential bias from non-participation in a dynamic clinical cohort of long-term childhood cancer survivors: results from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort StudyMalnourishment and length of hospital stay among paediatric cancer patients with febrile neutropaenia: a developing country perspective.The association between remarriage and HIV infection in 13 sub-Saharan African countries.Interviewer identity as exclusion restriction in epidemiology.Behavioral responses to surveys about nicotine dependence.Implementation of instrumental variable bounds for data missing not at random.A new modeling approach for quantifying expert opinion in the drug discovery process.Uncovering selection bias in case-control studies using Bayesian post-stratification.Impact of selection bias on the evaluation of clusters of chemical compounds in the drug discovery process.Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals
P2860
Q28393758-2CE53E0D-038D-47F0-B2FE-F90A1D8DA03DQ28710434-4935EA1B-A2AC-4BFC-B214-4F28421ABF41Q30846816-A60AF304-71EF-420D-9B8C-CFB7FE70AADAQ34525002-D36FC318-4E88-4E1A-8A66-3694B1596964Q36327017-A3AAF6C3-5412-40CA-984C-989799C9BA5EQ36358923-97959B90-829E-4B1C-976C-CB78B2949B76Q36501837-7F051599-C5CA-4A88-B881-ADA99184E109Q36542541-48D1E666-589B-4F3A-8668-4AEF55282A31Q38857613-CE19530E-FDF5-4F10-AA56-BBEA0E4A978AQ38967619-85BEE502-DAD3-429A-B812-AE6A3E160D5EQ42723181-ECDBA5FD-E7B6-4492-81C9-F0BEA3C5E300Q47235770-DC85E9A9-2D28-490A-95E4-2F20B065FA7EQ49373649-2CC1DB03-D723-437A-A4C7-7C18ABFC5C71Q50956137-5ABA955B-B268-4525-B62D-50C839034939Q51278390-FEECAD05-1071-42B5-93DE-FFB66C9CE078Q53159269-92A2D5F3-2D2D-415B-BD1B-999798E0322EQ56333550-269C7F36-5057-4BAD-BF3C-EFF0C98A8B80
P2860
Adjusting for selection effects in epidemiologic studies: why sensitivity analysis is the only "solution".
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年学术文章
@wuu
2011年学术文章
@zh
2011年学术文章
@zh-cn
2011年学术文章
@zh-hans
2011年学术文章
@zh-my
2011年学术文章
@zh-sg
2011年學術文章
@yue
2011年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Adjusting for selection effect ...... alysis is the only "solution".
@en
Adjusting for selection effect ...... alysis is the only "solution".
@nl
type
label
Adjusting for selection effect ...... alysis is the only "solution".
@en
Adjusting for selection effect ...... alysis is the only "solution".
@nl
prefLabel
Adjusting for selection effect ...... alysis is the only "solution".
@en
Adjusting for selection effect ...... alysis is the only "solution".
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Adjusting for selection effect ...... alysis is the only "solution".
@en
P2093
Alexina Mason
Nicky Best
Sara Geneletti
P356
10.1097/EDE.0B013E3182003276
P577
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z