Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals

about

Assessment of participation bias in cohort studies: systematic review and meta-regression analysis Smoking, alcohol, diabetes, obesity, socioeconomic status, and the risk of colorectal cancer in a population-based case-control study.

P2860

Q26769718-C38B99AE-CE82-4DFE-BCFB-E5F76458E6F5 Q43636697-16F03B0C-7771-48B0-9367-D7D65A6203D5

P2860

Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q56333550

description

article

@en

wetenschappelijk artikel

@nl

наукова стаття, опублікована в листопаді 2013

@uk

ലേഖനം

@ml

name

Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals

@en

Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals

@en-gb

Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals

@nl

type

Item

label

Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals

@en

Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals

@en-gb

Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals

@nl

prefLabel

Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals

@en

Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals

@en-gb

Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals

@nl

P1154

2-s2.0-84907286239

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P1433

Sage Open

P1476

Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals

@en

P2093

Graham Richard Law

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Paul D. Baxter

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

A structural approach to selection bias.

Participation rates in epidemiologic studies.

Do confounding or selection factors of residential wiring codes and magnetic fields distort findings of electromagnetic fields studies?

Characteristics of respondents and non-respondents from a case-control study of breast cancer in younger women.

Are prior head injuries or diagnostic X-rays associated with glioma in adults? The effects of control selection bias.

Adjusting for selection bias in retrospective, case-control studies.

Selection bias in epidemiologic studies.

Contacting controls: are we working harder for similar response rates, and does it make a difference?

Adjusting for selection effects in epidemiologic studies: why sensitivity analysis is the only "solution".

P304

215824401351126

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1177/2158244013511260

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Claire Keeble

Stuart Barber

P5530

1911691

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2013-11-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

258627631

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1049110684

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6409

89539187

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

bias

P953

80873