Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers.
about
Can Cochrane Reviews inform decisions to improve indigenous people's health?SARS and hospital priority setting: a qualitative case study and evaluationWhat do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?Setting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for EvaluationPandemic influenza preparedness: an ethical framework to guide decision-makingImproving district level health planning and priority setting in Tanzania through implementing accountability for reasonableness framework: Perceptions of stakeholders.Criteria for priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand: a discrete choice experiment.Research for better health: the Panamanian priority-setting experience and the need for a new process.Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments.The accountability for reasonableness approach to guide priority setting in health systems within limited resources--findings from action research at district level in Kenya, Tanzania, and Zambia.Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation.Decision maker perceptions of resource allocation processes in Canadian health care organizations: a national surveyAccess to intensive care unit beds for neurosurgery patients: a qualitative case study.Determinants of patient satisfaction with cataract surgery and length of time on the waiting listDoes accountability for reasonableness work? A protocol for a mixed methods study using an audit tool to evaluate the decision-making of clinical commissioning groups in England.Decision maker views on priority setting in the Vancouver Island Health Authority.Assessing the performance of health technology assessment organizations: a framework.6-STEPPPs: A Modular Tool to Facilitate Clinician Participation in Fair Decisions for Funding New Cancer DrugsSocietal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?Using evaluation theory in priority setting and resource allocation.Healthcare priority setting in Kenya: a gap analysis applying the accountability for reasonableness framework.Navigating stormy waters in times of fiscal uncertainty: Mitigating the challenges.A Qualitative Evaluation of Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis in a Canadian Pediatric Tertiary Care Institution.Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a discrete choice experiment.What constitutes high performance in priority setting and resource allocation? Decision maker narratives identified from a survey and qualitative study in Canadian healthcare organizations.What do district health planners in Tanzania think about improving priority setting using 'Accountability for reasonableness'?Attitudes toward supplementary criteria in the reimbursement process in Poland.Priority setting in kidney transplantation: a qualitative study evaluating Swedish practices.Beyond accountability for reasonableness.Publish or be damned: Individual Funding Requests and the publicity condition.Improving accountability in vaccine decision-making.Finding the right way to ration.LEGITIMACY OF MEDICINES FUNDING IN THE ERA OF ACCELERATED ACCESS.Why did some Danish counties introduce breast cancer screening and others not? An exploratory study of four selected counties.Health technology appraisal and the courts: accountability for reasonableness and the judicial model of procedural justiceThe values and ethical commitments of doctors engaging in macroallocation: a qualitative and evaluative analysis
P2860
Q24187706-27850AD9-B415-417D-8FA2-52A2128DEC49Q24799619-48E9A0F1-8518-4753-958C-11DEA3B640C8Q24800220-AC7A23E7-CBBE-4069-A920-4CDCA88CC1A4Q28083424-0CCEAF1F-585F-4876-852D-268F622AA1AEQ30230230-24F09E58-7D45-4DAD-B6B3-784D32F90F0BQ33759936-1863ECFE-DFA8-4357-91EA-69D946770DECQ34031503-7AFB41BE-602E-4677-BF23-724E9797B075Q34065744-1C0C0065-BF15-4724-95D6-BC472422ED9FQ34332744-C8B414CA-4600-4ED7-9166-383E0E569B82Q34544369-A76B26B7-0331-4EF5-B254-E245AEBE1CBEQ34585800-70868AAE-13DC-44E0-8CC8-458EAAC46138Q34790212-493F66F0-3520-465C-B83A-F24CFDB9CB55Q35476409-95809875-1702-4242-9B33-63CF58405A29Q35592453-2B78A458-E088-447A-9AEA-DC5D5E72283AQ35844266-AC2A8A59-7505-40B7-84E9-97BD9E461B91Q36828486-261C6CF0-2A7A-4047-8938-4265150496D5Q37064569-90B8A1FD-8EA9-429C-98A1-C525C9B424B4Q37790982-1B3F0445-B348-4D40-A0F9-EA997E37E76CQ37911500-8CC2066F-1730-4AAC-A67A-18F546E2202DQ38056923-C0C07588-4295-4AB9-9CDD-DF4ACD041D5CQ38115215-354F6BAF-B81F-46AC-9BDA-824DB986CEBDQ38543738-F265E03D-9E88-42EF-81DB-7D8F67F7BFFFQ40706117-E6FB2533-68EB-4EB0-A8DD-1944E8F51D39Q40929078-E791F6DD-A9CE-44E6-B02E-21AC9512CB7AQ41573422-2C14DE9E-923F-47B1-8A98-14DBE267C9E3Q42861931-4230521C-64C8-49AA-AC26-AD9C349ADFD4Q45372407-E54CB047-71C0-41EC-B9A8-0C553578AD97Q46181025-20C6BDB5-F79A-440C-9867-8FBF6864648AQ47568636-372A458A-672E-46A7-ABD3-2FA04F0BA428Q48122176-3B7D668F-F84A-4A28-87EB-381F07421B53Q48587929-10AD6C79-26E4-4D72-B318-4B03CF60DDA8Q48632055-B2F92309-25DB-4BAD-A702-097FC380B521Q50148347-2C7BAD3A-8C5E-460D-9F70-7CF8051FBF67Q50547859-92B5FA71-0D39-40FB-A979-348A76B95A40Q56893917-E3D3AB26-E437-4F2F-91C6-B00CCA1AD043Q58657299-11C62D31-E162-4BF9-8C95-C72737C007E8
P2860
Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年学术文章
@wuu
2002年学术文章
@zh
2002年学术文章
@zh-cn
2002年学术文章
@zh-hans
2002年学术文章
@zh-my
2002年学术文章
@zh-sg
2002年學術文章
@yue
2002年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Fairness, accountability for r ...... ority setting decision-makers.
@en
Fairness, accountability for r ...... ority setting decision-makers.
@nl
type
label
Fairness, accountability for r ...... ority setting decision-makers.
@en
Fairness, accountability for r ...... ority setting decision-makers.
@nl
prefLabel
Fairness, accountability for r ...... ority setting decision-makers.
@en
Fairness, accountability for r ...... ority setting decision-makers.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Fairness, accountability for r ...... ority setting decision-makers.
@en
P2093
Douglas K Martin
Mita Giacomini
Peter A Singer
P304
P356
10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00237-8
P577
2002-09-01T00:00:00Z