Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement
about
Using item response theory to explore the psychometric properties of extended matching questions examination in undergraduate medical educationMeasuring preferences for analgesic treatment for cancer pain: how do African-Americans and Whites perform on choice-based conjoint (CBC) analysis experiments?Public preferences for vaccination programmes during pandemics caused by pathogens transmitted through respiratory droplets - a discrete choice experiment in four European countries, 2013.Estimating Independent Locally Shifted Random Utility Models for Ranking Data.When outcome is a balance: methods to measure combined utility for the choice between induction of labour and expectant management in mild risk pregnancy at termVariability in depression prevalence in early rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of the CES-D and HAD-D Scales.Psychometric analysis of the self-harm inventory using Rasch modelling.Gambling in the visual periphery: a conjoint-measurement analysis of human ability to judge visual uncertainty.What Matters to Women When Making Decisions About Breast Cancer Chemoprevention?Reliability, construct validity and measurement potential of the ICF comprehensive core set for osteoarthritisObstetrical outcome valuations by patients, professionals, and laypersons: differences within and between groups using three valuation methods.Depression and anxiety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: prevalence rates based on a comparison of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) and the hospital, Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Plausible measurement analogies to some psychometric models of test performance.Towards improving the ethics of ecological research.Measuring engagement in deliberate self-harm behaviours: psychometric evaluation of six scales.Launching a virtual decision lab: development and field-testing of a web-based patient decision support research platform.Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional designAcceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis as an HIV prevention strategy: barriers and facilitators to pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among at-risk Peruvian populations.Introducing conjoint analysis method into delayed lotteries studies: its validity and time stability are higher than in adjusting.Construct Validity of the Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicines Questionnaire (HCAMQ)-An Investigation Using Modern Psychometric Approaches.Internal construct validity of the stress-energy questionnaire in a working population, a cohort study.An implicit measure of associations with mental illness versus physical illness: response latency decomposition and stimuli differential functioning in relation to IAT order of associative conditions and accuracy.On the interpretation of removable interactions: a survey of the field 33 years after LoftusWeighting of Criteria for Disease Prioritization Using Conjoint Analysis and Based on Health Professional and Student OpinionInformation Use Differences in Hot and Cold Risk Processing: When Does Information About Probability Count in the Columbia Card Task?Quality of life assessment in clinical practice in haemophilia treatment.The science in social scienceAnalysis of internal construct validity of the SRS-24 questionnaire.Exploring the feasibility of Conjoint Analysis as a tool for prioritizing innovations for implementation.Conjoint measurement of gloss and surface texture.Modeling the Mental Health Practice Change Preferences of Educators: A Discrete-Choice Conjoint Experiment.Towards personalizing treatment for depression : developing treatment values markers.Salient concerns in using analgesia for cancer pain among outpatients: A cluster analysis study.Can quality or quality-of-life be defined?Probabilistic choice models in health-state valuation research: background, theories, assumptions and applications.Mutual information, perceptual independence, and holistic face perception.Additivity of loudness across critical bands: a critical test.On Bayesian Testing of Additive Conjoint Measurement Axioms Using Synthetic Likelihood.Understanding farmers' preferences for artificial insemination services provided through dairy hubs.Personal health records in the Netherlands: potential user preferences quantified by a discrete choice experiment.
P2860
Q24804794-A94E6849-08AA-4E15-B9B3-FA7323098775Q28659121-4E2D5D61-42DE-47B9-8B95-569E52A84784Q30389099-57DCC934-205F-445F-B41A-7F729E2AFE40Q31035243-BD968060-BFEA-40E7-A0AF-68A46C4F5497Q33289914-10C17C42-E865-43A9-A924-FB3C8BDF04A0Q33406652-DF3DD862-D6CA-4D25-880F-5310DC3214C0Q33494761-7652395B-4465-45C8-9440-E7E8BE2C2500Q33769736-FF5F03BB-9EF3-4907-B3D7-D1C4060CB943Q33910927-0852DE0B-E4CB-4F2E-8BA5-B1A91A09D2EDQ34070033-49A5C332-7411-41B1-8711-3A230EDD606BQ34073146-218CC6D6-E1E5-477A-BDFC-8009B61560A9Q34136186-CDF036DD-52E5-44F9-8E27-DD4370F8103BQ34221470-7397B314-C5C6-4380-B41E-35DCD00CF85BQ34423224-D6C9170B-930F-41A7-878C-58649E5C1EABQ34535763-36F8C357-8784-4308-AD39-AF2790D0BC42Q34768958-5869CCCC-FF1E-4FC1-BFC4-C008FF7B3F73Q34866022-DA0E62D4-7EDA-41FC-840B-4FAB71938BDBQ34989216-9F8F73F6-9E0F-412B-9DD3-F1A8F94372E5Q35022175-051397F2-3C12-4403-9175-AD4B314E1F4CQ35102515-80A261F2-203B-4AD5-9D82-73488E508909Q35147755-061BFC5E-A2FA-4906-BA13-500357587394Q35202396-A5250E03-6340-46FE-BC8C-D4E1B7FDCAA0Q35706130-2259D894-FEA3-4E92-A824-81C9CD69D833Q35953984-F705EDC4-D012-4B16-8A37-63B2793683C7Q36294463-6C4862D6-FA7E-46E0-976E-97E5AC15081AQ36473028-B8382083-B69B-4E0A-851A-3CE72D22AAD6Q36485257-EABDBF58-E9F7-46D0-BBD0-21A005657117Q36502844-725F213E-68AF-417B-B03B-7FC9F6AD471CQ36891453-0CD7639E-015F-4BE9-81E3-187606AC60F1Q37186280-04050B22-4565-4A71-B2AC-1560A2A9DF00Q37583099-71FC685E-13FB-4B6D-9142-E25E4CA9DC0FQ37630855-BC538CA4-706C-4B1F-B3FF-E97A1251F66CQ37642467-33099262-4EB7-4F30-A1A0-0B9AF146A982Q37897174-0C13CF5A-3761-489D-9C30-7ACA74F01E7DQ38080918-78485F0D-E4A5-47D0-85CE-802B7044565CQ38105485-14F7399B-3E16-4796-B0A2-A5B243DF1AAAQ38566717-B69D9167-0EFB-4044-93F4-D830E97A8D87Q38607487-583EFDC0-3876-4B27-AF39-791397E3FE8FQ38797753-1A119408-BCB5-4A01-8C12-D009CF4F69AAQ39067752-20937F92-5942-4A67-9880-C93C943F5DC4
P2860
Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement
description
article
@en
im Januar 1964 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в січні 1964
@uk
ലേഖനം
@ml
name
Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement
@en
Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement
@nl
type
label
Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement
@en
Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement
@nl
prefLabel
Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement
@en
Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement
@nl
P1476
Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement
@en
P2093
R.Duncan Luce
P356
10.1016/0022-2496(64)90015-X
P50
P577
1964-01-01T00:00:00Z