Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences
about
Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer?Engaging Gatekeepers, Optimizing Decision Making, and Mitigating Bias: Design Specifications for Systemic Diversity Interventions.Stereotyping by omission: eliminate the negative, accentuate the positiveA quantitative linguistic analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 application critiques from investigators at one institutionThe status of women in US academic pharmacyThe Innuendo Effect: Hearing the Positive but Inferring the Negative.Do students' and authors' genders affect evaluations? A linguistic analysis of Medical Student Performance EvaluationsPatterns of Feedback on the Bridge to Independence: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of NIH Mentored Career Development Award Application Critiques.Affirming independence: Exploring mechanisms underlying a values affirmation intervention for first-generation studentsOpportunities and challenges for women PhD investigators in gastrointestinal researchDifferences in words used to describe racial and gender groups in Medical Student Performance Evaluations.Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?A Mentoring Opportunity: A Joint Effort in Writing Letters of Recommendation.Weight bias in graduate school admissions.Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities.How "it gets better": effectively communicating support to targets of prejudice.Bias against research on gender bias.Diversity and Inclusion in Conservation: A Proposal for a Marine Diversity NetworkThe Gendered Construction of Scientific ExcellenceRecent advances in conservation and population genomics data analysis
P2860
Q26795370-D1D9B8E5-4565-4AD9-A6EA-9517991B8E78Q33685097-6D76DDF7-01B0-41A0-AFB0-3C27D1819A49Q34608991-061ED24E-38A3-4B27-9EB5-A50EC752A35FQ34790956-B7EAC75A-5435-49D1-90CC-626324EE5B79Q35042728-1708D90E-646F-4C77-AFAE-C6E70EF85B39Q35646883-7BA90196-3E22-49C8-A8F2-DAB93DC21B24Q35875390-FA716902-776A-4B9E-A3BC-303AD84915A3Q36543395-9AE0C828-6C6E-4667-B72B-6584CAE61E9CQ36904859-FC05837A-ABE5-46DC-8322-4E2AA08535E8Q37097362-DF0C956D-5890-44AB-8F5E-16F065096A42Q38632269-1FB9000A-DDD6-4F86-B3AB-C528CED16DD9Q38858928-400C588C-FF35-450C-9E67-9FDFF165A0CEQ38903316-9ED65495-C446-4C77-B545-C12589155BD5Q45259430-B2938F7B-5695-48F7-87AC-62B2C1A5462CQ47286636-ADE0301C-0EAA-42BD-AB62-2E38AFA93CB0Q47679303-A62AE2D1-AA0D-4479-872C-93D97D10A9C3Q52661776-3B1291C6-38FB-4FBC-8CE1-A33F13872FDFQ57036972-E1E30B8A-3E5D-4A4F-B854-5DA3DF211288Q58538247-B8A60453-3D14-47E3-9961-27A713FE77B5Q58765793-E9AD18A3-0896-4EB9-AC92-9169A6A7B060
P2860
Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences
description
im Januar 2009 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована у 2009
@uk
name
Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences
@en
Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences
@nl
type
label
Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences
@en
Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences
@nl
prefLabel
Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences
@en
Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences
@nl
P2093
P356
P1476
Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences
@en
P2093
Juan M. Madera
Michelle R. Hebl
Randi C. Martin
P304
P356
10.1037/A0016539
P577
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z