Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning

about

Making better decisions in groups.

P2860

Q41580524-B52037D3-FAD4-46E3-9FA0-83769028D4BB

P2860

Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q56880256

description

article

@en

im November 2014 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel

@de

wetenschappelijk artikel

@nl

наукова стаття, опублікована в листопаді 2014

@uk

name

Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning

@en

Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning

@nl

type

Item

label

Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning

@en

Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning

@nl

prefLabel

Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning

@en

Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning

@nl

P1476

Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning

@en

P2093

Emmanuel Trouche

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hiroshi Yama

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hugo Mercier

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Vittorio Girotto

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Divergent consequences of success and failure in japan and north america: an investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves.

Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness.

Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament.

Can everyone become highly intelligent? Cultural differences in and societal consequences of beliefs about the universal potential for intelligence.

Strategies for revising judgment: how (and how well) people use others' opinions.

Two to tango: effects of collaboration and disagreement on dyadic judgment.

Collective induction without cooperation? Learning and knowledge transfer in cooperative groups and competitive auctions.

Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions.

Scientists’ Argumentative Reasoning

Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation

P304

341-355

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1080/13546783.2014.981582

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Christophe Heintz

Hugo Mercier

P577

2014-11-24T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning

about

P2860

P2860

Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577