Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
about
Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoningDeliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representativesMeasuring Political Thinking: Development and Validation of a Scale for “Deliberation Within”On Minimal Deliberation, Partisan Activism, and Teaching People How to Disagree
P2860
Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
description
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в березні 2012
@uk
name
Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
@en
Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
@nl
type
label
Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
@en
Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
@nl
prefLabel
Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
@en
Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
@en
P2093
Hugo Mercier
Hélène Landemore
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1467-9221.2012.00873.X
P577
2012-03-27T00:00:00Z