The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library? - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library?

The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q58631933

about

Bridging the gap between Wikipedia and academia Is classification necessary after Google?Interpreting reference work with contemporary practice theory Question types and intermediary elicitations

P2860

Q27686490-16FF1852-921B-4722-93BA-E2DD3A04B2C4 Q55992638-5BE89977-1C77-43F2-BBD5-DF08B7B70B32 Q58628464-0FD772ED-8E1E-4EBB-8A43-9C383EEE21D1 Q58770796-22E21518-617E-44B0-9204-23015D991239

P2860

The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q58631933

description

im Oktober 2009 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel

@de

wetenschappelijk artikel

@nl

наукова стаття, опублікована в жовтні 2009

@uk

name

The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library?

@en

The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library?

@nl

type

label

The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library?

@en

The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library?

@nl

prefLabel

The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library?

@en

The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library?

@nl

P1433

Q58631933-EB318971-4185-4978-A1C8-F825BFC82DFA

P1476

Q58631933-E621D0C0-CE81-45C1-AB40-94938DD4D449

P2093

Q58631933-B8539838-FC04-45F8-AAD4-12C3B092E327

P2860

Q58631933-2ECA9BF4-43B3-4C62-BAEF-F9384B4E8A7D

Q58631933-35FFBA29-607C-4BE8-8E5F-B8920C98746C

Q58631933-7B54D237-DE57-4E85-8B67-671C98D99CB4

Q58631933-7F6E4CFD-A31B-42CB-BE49-F9E181D9BAE8

Q58631933-8634B712-1FE8-414E-B433-79AC5B64785F

Q58631933-E5DD7734-68E2-40A3-AFC9-9CFA56A721D6

Q58631933-EC10CA82-317D-447B-B2C7-6D33088EDC88

Q58631933-FBC51A99-2A03-430E-8ECC-58F5DEC84BCC

P304

Q58631933-05E6ADB3-D64C-4038-BA90-0508836E2B21

P31

Q58631933-A441FB85-129C-472F-82F5-F605A961ECD7

P356

Q58631933-890DC622-634C-4DF1-9225-7231009ABD82

P433

Q58631933-B1C02B52-22FF-4FF4-8807-5A52B80F7EF8

P478

Q58631933-06935CE8-F690-4978-A532-F7B7108C3746

P577

Q58631933-ECCD7BDB-DCCC-455D-8D8B-1FFD44DBA386

P921

Q58631933-3D898DFE-7A35-439B-8430-42F66F167233

P356

00220410910998951

P1433

Journal of Documentation

P1476

The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library?

@en

P2093

Pnina Shachaf

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past

Evaluating authoritative sources using social networks: an insight from Wikipedia

What kind of expert should a system be?

What open access research can do for Wikipedia

Seekers, sloths and social reference: Homework questions submitted to a question-answering community

Search persistence and failure on the web: a “bounded rationality” and “satisficing” analysis

An epistemological critique of gap theory based library assessment: the case of SERVQUAL

Credibility on the internet: shifting from authority to reliability

P304

977-996

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1108/00220410910998951

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

65

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2009-10-16T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P921