Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science
about
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rankEmerging trends in peer review-a surveyUsing science and psychology to improve the dissemination and evaluation of scientific workPeer review and the publication processAn emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishingWhat is open peer review? A systematic reviewDoes small equal predatory? Analysis of publication charges and transparency of editorial policies in Croatian open access journals.A post-publication analysis of the idealized upper reference value of 2.5 mIU/L for TSH: Time to support the thyroid axis with magnesium and iron especially in the setting of reproduction medicine.Research ethics in the post-genomic era.Ranking games.Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers.Ciência & Saúde coletiva Journal at the national and international context of scientific communication.The state of the art in peer reviewPeer Review: How much weightage should the editor give to reviewer's opinion?
P2860
Q21129393-83EF336A-1935-4FE5-BF7C-CE846AD5FEE3Q24273351-5A6725BC-2D20-41DA-BD55-EF86CFE4C9CEQ24273358-CC52497C-9941-4693-8778-64036A357264Q28076160-231F9D88-674F-408F-B3D5-4B062DF9B369Q28712507-3104BAB9-FD72-4BD5-8510-E2A3C9C86828Q29649956-AAC9C5E5-3760-478E-933B-F8E6325DC5C4Q33859336-688502FC-5F20-4D3B-9704-E8284E225DE7Q37743404-421EBBA7-51F0-45B3-9F32-F5D3573B2C15Q38125958-A63CEB87-D517-46B9-9AE2-6A69F2E095F2Q38237046-31C4B464-F7F1-42A6-A36C-892F23990E6DQ42708376-34822AC8-7340-4DF1-8B1C-32FF22974C45Q42938056-BE0DC068-05F6-4C32-B050-4D4405FB1336Q47142072-568B13FA-096B-49B8-A6A3-A99308E9CED6Q49015388-1DDD73F1-53E9-4688-B048-5C57DCFFE19CQ57554278-8E56363D-37A6-481F-9884-C4A636D0C8E1Q57823048-F0A92451-B7EE-4735-AAD3-E3E945E028AF
P2860
Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012 թուականին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2012 թվականին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
name
Open evaluation: a vision for ...... review and rating for science
@ast
Open evaluation: a vision for ...... review and rating for science
@en
Open evaluation: a vision for ...... review and rating for science
@nl
type
label
Open evaluation: a vision for ...... review and rating for science
@ast
Open evaluation: a vision for ...... review and rating for science
@en
Open evaluation: a vision for ...... review and rating for science
@nl
prefLabel
Open evaluation: a vision for ...... review and rating for science
@ast
Open evaluation: a vision for ...... review and rating for science
@en
Open evaluation: a vision for ...... review and rating for science
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Open evaluation: a vision for ...... review and rating for science
@en
P2860
P356
10.3389/FNCOM.2012.00079
P407
P577
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z