Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial
about
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journalsCooperation between referees and authors increases peer review accuracyThe academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based reviewEditorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studiesEditorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studiesScientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific CommunicationEmerging trends in peer review-a surveyViews on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universitiesCurrent Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine: a new journal for a new age (http://cvm.controlled-trials.com)Inadequate use and regulation of interventions against publication bias decreases their effectiveness: a systematic reviewHow open science helps researchers succeed.Irreproducibility of published bioscience research: Diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapyTowards an open science publishing platformITK: enabling reproducible research and open scienceOnly connect: the merger of BMC Pharmacology and BMC Clinical PharmacologyOpen evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for sciencePeer review in PLoS MedicineWhat is open peer review? A systematic reviewImpact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysisWelcome to Journal of Foot and Ankle Research: a new open access journal for foot health professionals.A survey of orthopaedic journal editors determining the criteria of manuscript selection for publicationChecklist for Early Recognition and Treatment of Acute Illness (CERTAIN): evolution of a content management system for point-of-care clinical decision support.Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial.Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal dataAre reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective studyA multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer reviewPeer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem.A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical scienceNon-financial conflicts of interest in academic grant evaluation: a qualitative study of multiple stakeholders in FranceOnline publishing: how, why and other related issues.The ups and downs of peer review.A new era in sports science: the launch of BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation.Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trialsToward a new model of scientific publishing: discussion and a proposalImages in Paediatric Cardiology - no longer an infant!How international is Medical Education?Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial.Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review modelsReviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.What makes the best medical ethics journal? A North American perspective.
P2860
Q21686079-C31D52E5-ED4C-4066-9D2C-EDA21BCF7C35Q22067773-60950071-975E-48A6-8C27-15504A7FE7E5Q24049929-E28785BA-55AF-4136-963A-B64A2100D8B0Q24244965-F6535E45-9EAA-477A-B2EA-0D260BFC9D99Q24245573-7731BCD5-9808-42CA-BCA2-F960B242ECE7Q24273234-AAE67BBE-F22F-4CD4-878F-61E25B27DCBBQ24273351-7A0DBB43-79AB-41A4-AACC-F0D1268041A1Q24288964-193A9237-C510-4CF7-8E8E-337CA5722C07Q24792288-96712778-C209-4C24-9522-CB69645820DFQ26995526-512A74F6-6145-42D1-A729-B450E885066CQ27313486-BC932588-DFCA-461C-A6FE-B38A27EAE697Q28583395-39F61963-53DF-4F1C-8894-E391DCA56BC5Q28603680-C3F50132-5C26-4835-9210-27C3464C07F3Q28658840-F26F2AFD-0116-4321-B88E-E85D8E1CA754Q28710523-5A9F960F-60C7-44CE-B7E3-389F5E75C330Q28717188-9FBE79E0-06A8-48EB-BAFD-63404A882977Q28763694-052A32E7-9935-44D7-A6B1-2E5AAE52D426Q29649956-1A24E088-EAE4-4A7D-9F35-45818512D91FQ30249679-B723315F-FC22-4798-B964-9E2C38716A8EQ30483946-3800FB4E-8E28-428B-922A-838039055FC6Q30500256-E4152855-66BD-42A6-AE2C-62A3FBA3CB95Q30818505-54615492-FC88-4DC2-82A8-3D12E55BFE4FQ30830681-A8547A16-512E-4F24-98CD-6BB8C2224E3EQ31043561-133B4CE0-13D8-47C5-9385-AE03A0108C0FQ33245151-2EA99F34-3735-497A-8A1F-AF0112084F55Q33269085-4718286C-D988-4391-A3D5-87CB8B910D35Q33810540-9A4A6BBD-5D1B-492D-B7F4-7D0C29DC7D5AQ33852921-0E5DBD9C-98A7-4C0D-B2DA-CBE9DCB863FDQ34230558-97666D08-DC36-492A-B854-66F577495239Q34389806-6E70086D-9C84-42C7-8E64-01E32CCA22E7Q34636617-E3DA454E-84BC-47AF-A27D-1C1948F21AD5Q34654936-DB33CA14-5FC8-4C55-BBC8-E25A00CAD68EQ35303719-BABD7503-F691-4537-B08F-72F79FE2F05DQ35590711-D61E30D0-C081-4840-8B69-F8D88E724613Q35597640-ECBA0E38-31A0-473C-98C5-E5F190BB5E30Q35666598-F04B927D-1624-4B9D-ABCE-DFAA0C0858CEQ35680672-3DD2C8E0-C2B3-48F2-835A-41E576777E11Q35794330-0B12B8E2-9810-401B-A2D6-C741C9EF9537Q35990825-E76BAC31-5F92-46C5-B79A-4D188D5F50B7Q36274704-6DA04668-2F4D-47D1-9F49-E943DABDDF1D
P2860
Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial
description
1999 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1999 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1999 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1999年の論文
@ja
1999年論文
@yue
1999年論文
@zh-hant
1999年論文
@zh-hk
1999年論文
@zh-mo
1999年論文
@zh-tw
1999年论文
@wuu
name
Effect of open peer review on ...... mendations: a randomised trial
@ast
Effect of open peer review on ...... mendations: a randomised trial
@en
Effect of open peer review on ...... mendations: a randomised trial
@nl
type
label
Effect of open peer review on ...... mendations: a randomised trial
@ast
Effect of open peer review on ...... mendations: a randomised trial
@en
Effect of open peer review on ...... mendations: a randomised trial
@nl
prefLabel
Effect of open peer review on ...... mendations: a randomised trial
@ast
Effect of open peer review on ...... mendations: a randomised trial
@en
Effect of open peer review on ...... mendations: a randomised trial
@nl
P2093
P2860
P3181
P356
P1433
P1476
Effect of open peer review on ...... mendations: a randomised trial
@en
P2093
P2860
P3181
P356
10.1136/BMJ.318.7175.23
P407
P577
1999-01-02T00:00:00Z