Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models
about
Peer review and the publication processTowards an open science publishing platformShould Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?Ten considerations for open peer reviewAuthor-suggested reviewers: gender differences and influences on the peer review process at an ecology journalIntegrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement
P2860
Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
2015年论文
@zh
2015年论文
@zh-cn
name
Retrospective analysis of the ...... ingle-blind peer review models
@ast
Retrospective analysis of the ...... ingle-blind peer review models
@en
type
label
Retrospective analysis of the ...... ingle-blind peer review models
@ast
Retrospective analysis of the ...... ingle-blind peer review models
@en
prefLabel
Retrospective analysis of the ...... ingle-blind peer review models
@ast
Retrospective analysis of the ...... ingle-blind peer review models
@en
P2860
P50
P1433
P1476
Retrospective analysis of the ...... ingle-blind peer review models
@en
P2093
Shreeya Nanda
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJOPEN-2015-008707
P577
2015-09-29T00:00:00Z