about
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer reviewRooting out bias.The state of the art in peer reviewCan lifestyle preferences help explain the persistent gender gap in academia? The "mothers work less" hypothesis supported for German but not for U.S. early career researchersUptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics
P2860
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 21 March 2017
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Gender bias in scholarly peer review
@en
Gender bias in scholarly peer review.
@nl
type
label
Gender bias in scholarly peer review
@en
Gender bias in scholarly peer review.
@nl
prefLabel
Gender bias in scholarly peer review
@en
Gender bias in scholarly peer review.
@nl
P2860
P50
P356
P1433
P1476
Gender bias in scholarly peer review
@en
P2093
Andreas Neef
P2860
P356
10.7554/ELIFE.21718
P407
P577
2017-03-21T00:00:00Z