about
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rankUsing science and psychology to improve the dissemination and evaluation of scientific workAn emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishingOpen evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for scienceRewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication.Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior.The state of the art in peer review
P2860
Q21129393-760CFEAE-E3A0-44DA-BADC-74D1C0D29B04Q24273358-8DE48155-9BF1-4017-8945-5063542E1D8BQ28712507-70411A04-460D-42C5-B2B2-9FAF2DF2B278Q28717188-237404CD-8E35-4951-B2FD-FBF25D8802EBQ30487757-1AA37D1F-1242-4EB9-B78C-54419AEF4071Q39026700-D3A94993-9411-4B5E-8DB3-4406233E1DD3Q57554278-04F33C16-3E0B-409E-9535-2B9F184666B2
P2860
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings.
@en
type
label
Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings.
@en
altLabel
Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings
@en
prefLabel
Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings.
@en
P2860
P356
P1476
Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings
@en
P2093
Răzvan V Florian
P2860
P356
10.3389/FNCOM.2012.00031
P407
P577
2012-05-22T00:00:00Z