Opening peer-review: the democracy of science. - Test2 - elhamkhani - TriplyDB

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science.

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q42735443

about

Grant application review: the case of transparency Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal.

P2860

Q24288795-4884071F-9E79-48F2-98BE-588235E32903 Q38263373-C66C2126-F278-445E-A1FD-92AF3ACCAA26

P2860

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q42735443

description

2014 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2014年の論文

@ja

2014年論文

@yue

2014年論文

@zh-hant

2014年論文

@zh-hk

2014年論文

@zh-mo

2014年論文

@zh-tw

2014年论文

@wuu

2014年论文

@zh

2014年论文

@zh-cn

name

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science.

@en

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science.

@nl

type

label

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science.

@en

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science.

@nl

prefLabel

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science.

@en

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science.

@nl

P1433

Q42735443-C60D8C2E-D134-408C-B1BD-A74F3D83A3A9

P1476

Q42735443-0684FE4D-4D81-45EE-B2E9-EDA98A86C10E

P2093

Q42735443-EB8DD3F4-5A98-485A-B12C-A06E7BBC679B

P2860

Q42735443-0CB00871-0138-4922-8FE3-ACDA29170004

Q42735443-44FC055A-1CDF-44E3-90CF-B336E8538307

Q42735443-7746C72D-1A94-467E-839E-9DB2717782CE

Q42735443-92560F04-3D4E-40E8-9AD5-68E880156C31

Q42735443-970B6E45-F60D-4095-BAF6-942F9D6DD2FA

Q42735443-B90AC38F-4966-4B27-9D39-F5C42EC7F351

Q42735443-C037344E-2DED-40FA-B283-24E6C89FAE75

Q42735443-FEF725B9-111A-4159-83C8-5B094070CA40

P2888

Q42735443-9AEE24EF-D738-470D-BB82-215CED7A3A26

P304

Q42735443-C9959D20-5C53-41EB-9670-ED3008507217

P31

Q42735443-8edb600d-c044-4b57-be06-35cd1d3d21ad

Q42735443-AC8BC1BB-28F6-46CB-9CC4-DBF67A18E0DB

P356

Q42735443-1E86BE94-093E-4573-A46E-721003900974

P478

Q42735443-9155C18B-128D-4F0D-A8B3-7AFB662C08E3

P50

Q42735443-2855F307-0FF4-457E-921D-9A6899A7341D

P577

Q42735443-0EBD30DE-9DB9-4769-8EDC-D19BAEBB5920

P5875

Q42735443-B2EF24F0-898D-4E66-BCE0-D412562A65FD

P6179

Q42735443-E4537C29-7BCC-45EB-B585-BA4F133B58CA

P698

Q42735443-A4DBF109-5E67-469A-9CF5-661B121E451A

P932

Q42735443-CABDC808-F78E-403C-AFD9-A05CCD566D93

P356

P1433

Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine

P1476

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science.

@en

P2093

Bjorn R Olsen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Multi-stage open peer review: scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial

Peer review in PLoS Medicine

Making reviewers visible: openness, accountability, and credit.

Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts?

Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes.

Is open peer review the fairest system? No.

End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments.

P2888

P304

2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1186/1477-5751-13-2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

13

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Daniel Shanahan

P577

2014-01-24T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

259915520

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1037073983

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

24460678

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3900934

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string