Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
about
Core outcome sets for research and clinical practice.The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.Citation analysis did not provide a reliable assessment of core outcome set uptakeCore Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps.A review of patient and carer participation and the use of qualitative research in the development of core outcome setsImproving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research.Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set developmentHow to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guidelineCore outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review.A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials.STANDARDIZED OUTCOMES IN NEPHROLOGY-PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (SONG-PD): STUDY PROTOCOL FOR ESTABLISHING A CORE OUTCOME SET IN PD.Toward Establishing Core Outcome Domains For Trials in Kidney Transplantation: Report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Kidney Transplantation Consensus Workshops.The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities update (2015).Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations.A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery.Development of a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Effectiveness Trials in Esophageal Cancer Resection Surgery.Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain.Impact of question order on prioritisation of outcomes in the development of a core outcome set: a randomised controlled trial.Survey indicated that core outcome set development is increasingly including patients, being conducted internationally and using Delphi surveys.Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.Including patients in core outcome set development: issues to consider based on three workshops with around 100 international delegates.Patient-important outcomes in systematic reviews: Poor quality of evidence.Physical Rehabilitation Core Outcomes In Critical illness (PRACTICE): protocol for development of a core outcome set.Core Items for a Standardized Resource Use Measure: Expert Delphi Consensus Survey.Methods to identify and prioritize patient-centered outcomes for use in comparative effectiveness research
P2860
Q30234594-F43C805C-79AB-46F4-8920-665444A4DECEQ33877196-D59BEA70-7EF2-4089-BCFA-79CCDC039D0EQ33910843-3946563F-70BB-4FFB-8305-70E123DAB50CQ36166067-AE5C4294-B442-4F98-97EC-4E441B407266Q36223898-66FBBA7D-C4F6-4C52-A260-6DB01C555D51Q36310440-40AC6CF7-9BEC-4EDF-92A1-3C2E711220A4Q37050937-B1AB3AEB-0044-4631-94C6-443689882E16Q37185216-0FDF4868-6F2F-4008-AD1F-56DFDA8E3257Q37251460-09141C11-C8CB-4F08-BADD-FFC22587EEEFQ38371279-B124C987-ADC9-49D7-9710-603C1DC4B409Q39202486-E53150C1-76C3-408C-93AA-09339E8796D8Q39210349-35540BCF-78AF-4789-9936-4D2566AEF0A6Q40122537-64A0ABBD-2A29-4D63-811B-489F602B8110Q42324092-0C61A91C-71C3-429E-8217-1F4FDDC54576Q45699799-E1399BDE-6A0B-4B19-A2EF-7B0A8AF7AA44Q47231470-4C26A43B-EC28-4798-8AA8-10846BF4CDA5Q47950880-D5F71D87-4384-46D4-8868-C39A29332E1CQ48546193-4FD0D3B6-BD49-45F3-AC89-373ABE242010Q49686829-576035B9-8740-433B-A5AC-9776BF64DD7FQ49900479-23A49EAB-B4D1-4608-8750-CF7C1EC10E60Q50041708-469BABB1-8916-41C8-90CC-317780175D13Q51411579-B73E9BF7-4879-41F4-9C5C-FCC407FCD227Q52604582-28F4072B-AABB-4A2D-83AF-669876CBBFE0Q55038227-36AA1E7A-D285-4F5C-9609-CEC7CFBBB824Q55513584-C7420075-3B64-41C3-ABEE-28AF577B0276Q57516893-784A8324-0680-453A-A535-39DBFF1519CE
P2860
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2016 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年論文
@yue
2016年論文
@zh-hant
2016年論文
@zh-hk
2016年論文
@zh-mo
2016年論文
@zh-tw
2016年论文
@wuu
name
Choosing Important Health Outc ...... Updated Review and User Survey
@ast
Choosing Important Health Outc ...... Updated Review and User Survey
@en
Choosing Important Health Outc ...... Updated Review and User Survey
@nl
type
label
Choosing Important Health Outc ...... Updated Review and User Survey
@ast
Choosing Important Health Outc ...... Updated Review and User Survey
@en
Choosing Important Health Outc ...... Updated Review and User Survey
@nl
prefLabel
Choosing Important Health Outc ...... Updated Review and User Survey
@ast
Choosing Important Health Outc ...... Updated Review and User Survey
@en
Choosing Important Health Outc ...... Updated Review and User Survey
@nl
P2093
P2860
P3181
P1433
P1476
Choosing Important Health Outc ...... Updated Review and User Survey
@en
P2093
Elizabeth Gargon
Jane M Blazeby
Mike Clarke
Sarah L Gorst
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0146444
P407
P577
2016-01-19T00:00:00Z