Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q26825933

about

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey Complications Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Tear Repair: A Systematic Review of Terms and Definitions With Focus on Shoulder Stiffness Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey Effectiveness of acupuncture and related therapies for palliative care of cancer: overview of systematic reviews.Core Outcome Sets and Multidimensional Assessment Tools for Harmonizing Outcome Measure in Chronic Pain and Back Pain Core outcome sets and systematic reviews Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients Core outcome sets for research and clinical practice.A systematic review finds limited data on measurement properties of instruments measuring outcomes in adult intensive care unit survivors.A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and stakeholder involvement through interviews and a Delphi survey.Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review.Recommendations for a first Core Outcome Measurement set for complex regional PAin syndrome Clinical sTudies (COMPACT).Core Outcomes and Common Data Elements in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature Focusing on Reported Outcomes.Development of a core outcome set for effectiveness trials aimed at optimising prescribing in older adults in care homes.Protocol for the development of a salutogenic intrapartum core outcome set (SIPCOS).The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.Descriptive analysis of cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews: an update and comparison between 2009 and 2013.Citation analysis did not provide a reliable assessment of core outcome set uptake Improving core outcome set development: qualitative interviews with developers provided pointers to inform guidance Creation of a core outcome set for clinical trials of people with shoulder pain: a study protocol.The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013.Evaluating outcomes used in cardiothoracic surgery interventional research: a systematic review of reviews to develop a core outcome set.Development of a comprehensive hospital-based elder abuse intervention: an initial systematic scoping review Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platform Core outcome sets and trial registries.Outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of appendicitis treatments in children: a systematic review.The Importance of Integration of Stakeholder Views in Core Outcome Set Development: Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Cleft Palate.Standardised outcomes in nephrology - Haemodialysis (SONG-HD): study protocol for establishing a core outcome set in haemodialysis.Which outcome measures are reported by clinical trials investigating OME treatment? A case for standardised reporting.Prophylactic mesh use during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia.Reported Outcome Measures in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review.Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps.A review of patient and carer participation and the use of qualitative research in the development of core outcome sets A core outcome set for all types of cardiac surgery effectiveness trials: a study protocol for an international eDelphi survey to achieve consensus on what to measure and the subsequent selection of measurement instruments.Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: final report of the joint National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia/James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership.Core domain and outcome measurement sets for shoulder pain trials are needed: systematic review of physical therapy trials.Social network analysis identified central outcomes for core outcome sets using systematic reviews of HIV/AIDS The use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core outcome set development Directions for new developments on statistical design and analysis of small population group trials

P2860

Q26771000-2FB92C53-8785-4B83-9B29-B1974184DF95 Q26775997-6113CD97-7AD3-4D98-AF90-792BD74B3F5C Q26778351-CB44A4BE-15E0-4F33-B023-BF5CC575DDAD Q27305930-CD9877DA-CB77-4E6A-B373-2AA15F8EE8DF Q28066762-0CC1AF16-D0ED-4D64-8CA2-C00C2DA7211D Q28069515-8ABDF35C-C8F5-48B9-A7B3-3D8ECD51F25A Q28278929-C5FBD452-8CF2-4ABC-B610-9E99D7071A49 Q30234594-8C5E6120-6764-4375-806E-FBABCA1F5B0D Q30240946-E12FC966-C8AF-4696-9124-09E8D2E54CE8 Q30626731-4B232A18-4B0E-4980-B746-18B573BDC2D8 Q30639259-6D3E83DD-7155-4A6B-A1BF-4675FC8FE98D Q30852024-C3562EBE-50DC-409E-9ADA-A2B5E74C07BB Q30988678-0CF31605-54FA-4C0D-AB51-BA9AF6EE11DC Q33555917-CA4D904A-199C-4603-BBD9-C645F8B407B9 Q33576285-40C5497C-32AD-4CEE-85B4-9B6603ECDB97 Q33877196-201B396B-9378-4B1B-8C7F-89E280B6D566 Q33892497-A26DB198-4662-4971-B0C7-209A0CE90E8B Q33910843-D18B4ABE-AA53-48E4-B748-1C546A04B9BF Q33910854-3F10FCAB-BD70-43D5-A735-8C85D071C921 Q33921710-330FD0B4-4B18-42A9-AD75-6DA6326423EA Q33938597-65271092-3143-428F-828E-63299822FE9F Q35242331-74734038-2D7C-4670-8259-22B83724B08C Q35566825-5BA3CC4C-E621-40E8-ABDC-C7F27B3BE9EC Q35653223-0438DB64-C4C7-45B2-9FA6-E774988CA7CC Q35658444-F4FE15FA-26C4-4D53-905F-5788046C11C2 Q35665342-FBEBF81C-7097-4EF9-BFE8-6E428D475A28 Q35675722-CDF905B5-D25F-4A8B-A235-C52E29AA9C34 Q35977529-6FFD1137-386A-49CA-AC10-A8A778942E04 Q36040734-7138AF87-73F5-4A8F-ACBC-1EBAA1E37BCB Q36043006-3DBDB836-C720-402F-A90B-DE9F0AB9BAFF Q36092312-AF7C4885-F05A-4324-9CA1-7CBBA1C259C7 Q36166067-9D5F4F68-5D9B-44F8-9608-866FD7CD087F Q36223898-EE426D9F-1CD3-4B53-B244-DAD9BC71B869 Q36310440-D8C0F71C-453D-4310-A5B8-AB6EF6852318 Q36341040-361B73F3-8E3C-4A12-8FC8-17C5EAE0B59A Q36406215-E88C3918-87C8-49B5-BFBD-9CC2BA9D1F0C Q36459560-52922CEC-640B-4FD5-A4F7-3B00B914530E Q36521959-D5D5B02D-4A5D-4A68-BD90-2899800DA1E8 Q36865661-83F8C8B2-E917-43F4-9FFD-F915EF30F07C Q37006526-043D840C-19F1-4703-A806-B9EFBE468B9C

P2860

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q26825933

description

2014 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2014 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2014 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2014年の論文

@ja

2014年論文

@yue

2014年論文

@zh-hant

2014年論文

@zh-hk

2014年論文

@zh-mo

2014年論文

@zh-tw

2014年论文

@wuu

name

Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review

@ast

Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review

@en

Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review

@nl

type

label

Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review

@ast

Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review

@en

Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review

@nl

prefLabel

Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review

@ast

Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review

@en

Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review

@nl

P1433

Q26825933-5BC779A2-3A4B-41C5-B3A0-065EB5098EA5

P1476

Q26825933-FB992264-2E78-4EE3-BF24-CEF92629EC65

P2093

Q26825933-1100DE9B-8C87-453F-8165-287085C0557C

Q26825933-26C9B9CC-DAD2-407A-BB2D-14E72D1399EC

Q26825933-41323707-3D5E-408E-A7FF-7AB0C08DC225

Q26825933-6FDD3675-09C7-4C4E-B88D-EB502C900C7E

Q26825933-7F9101EA-898E-4948-BF82-600A9CDCE567

Q26825933-FC7C7F6A-7748-46AF-A497-556B63EA61FC

P275

Q26825933-8C0C2B54-2E42-45FB-BDBC-DFB2195F73B0

P2860

Q26825933-126E452B-00C8-4C7B-8966-C22BFA6492F6

Q26825933-2B9883E9-5D3D-4F4F-B0C0-D2293202D924

Q26825933-3F4C2932-4E4E-4902-8D22-ED9BFDB6ED45

Q26825933-40B9724A-B41D-4438-AA1D-AC427DCFE660

Q26825933-6B45079F-A6FE-49AC-A1F9-CC36FF3CD4C0

Q26825933-759F331E-135E-41BE-8220-27A010C0DF05

Q26825933-AD582229-131B-4A0C-9F20-5F529FFAD82C

Q26825933-BBB80229-D1E0-4117-B5CE-8BAA97796E4C

Q26825933-E241420A-2AE2-4DCA-AFC7-13C3730558E0

Q26825933-EB370468-B5A6-40F1-BF56-0CA2E9B947C0

P304

Q26825933-9EEA6D0E-0BA5-4CF6-A638-4833838C9A2D

P31

Q26825933-980FD39D-3C64-4D8C-A6A5-A10D6256001D

Q26825933-F8B71B76-0554-4566-BC80-8D848196D078

Q26825933-FBB70BA9-C987-4690-A6E4-F2EBDB8F5D6C

P3181

Q26825933-CAB1FC7D-3BDC-40A0-9D65-B2CE97874805

P356

Q26825933-48DE7B36-51CD-4889-B536-784443D2080F

P407

Q26825933-D59E68AA-BEFD-4E4B-8A72-D33775C79AA0

P433

Q26825933-9572B222-6776-42B0-BF28-0D2B6AB1864F

P478

Q26825933-883D5444-7598-42C0-89CE-73A3EE0070DB

P50

Q26825933-EE909844-1321-419E-92EF-ECF616F8733A

P577

Q26825933-CA8A8CF7-1E74-4637-B6B0-D0FCAE7F1198

Q26825933-FAA25F85-33C9-4FB6-9199-92BF01A0F3AB

P5875

Q26825933-61636116-35D0-4704-AFF5-52074667F307

P698

Q26825933-AD5C6116-B267-4B03-AE17-C5079C8AA966

P932

Q26825933-AAC77728-24E3-4929-AB24-AFEEA6A6B835

P3181

P356

JOURNAL.PONE.0099111

P1433

P1476

Choosing important health outc ...... research: a systematic review

@en

P2093

Binu Gurung

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Doug G. Altman

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Elizabeth Gargon

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jane M. Blazeby

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mike Clarke

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nancy Medley

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P275

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

P2860

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials

A systematic review of studies that aim to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials in children

SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias

Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines.

Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider

Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews?--a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane Review Groups.

Content and quality of 10,000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 60 years.

P304

e99111

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

systematic review

P3181

815567

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P356

10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0099111

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

9

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Paula Williamson

P577

2014-01-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

2014-06-16T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

263129609

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

24932522

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

4059640

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string