Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.
about
Big data for bipolar disorder.Data elements and validation methods used for electronic surveillance of health care-associated infections: a systematic reviewDevelopment of a Web-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Drug Prescription: Non-Interventional Naturalistic Description of the Antipsychotic Prescription Patterns in 4345 Outpatients and Future ApplicationsReconciling evidence-based medicine and precision medicine in the era of big data: challenges and opportunitiesDramatyping: a generic algorithm for detecting reasonable temporal correlations between drug administration and lab value alterationsBig data are coming to psychiatry: a general introductionAn integrated, ontology-driven approach to constructing observational databases for researchElectronic health records and community health surveillance of childhood obesityExtracting research-quality phenotypes from electronic health records to support precision medicineSustaining Research Networks: the Twenty-Year Experience of the HMO Research NetworkBig Data: Are Biomedical and Health Informatics Training Programs Ready? Contribution of the IMIA Working Group for Health and Medical Informatics EducationBeyond information retrieval and electronic health record use: competencies in clinical informatics for medical educationLaunching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research networkElectronic health records to facilitate clinical research.Can we predict a national profile of non-attendance paediatric urology patients: a multi-institutional electronic health record study.Facilitating biomedical researchers' interrogation of electronic health record data: Ideas from outside of biomedical informaticsTransparent reporting of data quality in distributed data networks.Breast cancer treatment across health care systems: linking electronic medical records and state registry data to enable outcomes researchSick patients have more data: the non-random completeness of electronic health records.Community-level determinants of obesity: harnessing the power of electronic health records for retrospective data analysis.Hidden in plain sight: bias towards sick patients when sampling patients with sufficient electronic health record data for research.Estimating causal effects in observational studies using Electronic Health Data: Challenges and (some) solutionsBig data and large sample size: a cautionary note on the potential for biasClinical research informatics and electronic health record dataConsiderations for using research data to verify clinical data accuracy.How the provenance of electronic health record data matters for research: a case example using system mapping.Recommendations for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.Availability of structured and unstructured clinical data for comparative effectiveness research and quality improvement: a multisite assessmentBarriers to using eHealth data for clinical performance feedback in Malawi: A case study.Advancing Symptom Science Through Use of Common Data Elements.Are family physicians comprehensively using electronic medical records such that the data can be used for secondary purposes? A Canadian perspective.Rediscovering drug side effects: the impact of analytical assumptions on the detection of associations in EHR dataCharacterizing Secondary Use of Clinical Data.Challenges Associated With Using Large Data Sets for Quality Assessment and Research in Clinical Settings.Learning About Missing Data Mechanisms in Electronic Health Records-based Research: A Survey-based Approach.Application of An Ontology for Characterizing Data Quality For a Secondary Use of EHR DataData quality assessment framework to assess electronic medical record data for use in researchExtracting Electronic Health Record Data in a Practice-Based Research Network: Processes to Support Translational Research across Diverse Practice OrganizationsOpportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review.Using primary care electronic health record data for comparative effectiveness research: experience of data quality assessment and preprocessing in The Netherlands.
P2860
Q26749257-C785A821-C73B-499A-A20A-3EC4BDBA4047Q28080721-18E97394-20AD-4F72-B4B3-D2D79C9268BAQ28552825-2BA927DE-9AA9-4614-9BAB-1546AA63507FQ28586368-7ABC63B6-C31D-4668-A250-B5008910D552Q28601745-5AEF4577-B42C-4D7B-9861-3B4408C36BE0Q28602477-A515D20B-372A-4099-B1FC-B2C7DA669491Q28632523-C523074D-D95F-4268-8377-8BD545FAEAABQ28647322-591CB547-3078-4167-B346-71079AF24E84Q28648163-3D2B6EB9-67D0-4C09-9E87-626C60586E86Q28651796-E42B87D8-C9D8-44FA-956E-87C34DA6BD85Q28652540-576914E9-2A39-4A99-914B-7E7D88BC590AQ28656039-4DEE344B-EF6A-4748-B669-565E49ADAACFQ28656423-005A293E-805F-4629-93F0-484B8F37E5FFQ30248321-BECA4DB6-4338-4BCA-AB21-D0FF8E4E8A2CQ30354943-B4F1AC18-64BE-44B6-85C2-C895810C8AC7Q30385610-7A476E6D-B426-4E2C-A73D-E4517FF7F4E7Q30487978-11508DFA-F276-42C2-84C5-549600530A8CQ30671803-0A4C9B0A-8B0E-4AE0-97C1-395480A57C64Q30760005-86816562-4F60-4725-BB2F-07A03AA41338Q30828243-30893AB6-C09F-4B43-A8E7-B445B2BDECF1Q30830200-6FC1A482-E03A-4A66-AF6A-A7DEF57F1534Q30830592-8A705DF3-DFF6-44D8-9B0D-C6DC9F7FE18FQ30837496-68E96CFB-3284-4FDC-A20F-CCB2DEC418DCQ30842819-41720235-4B63-4D93-A1BC-2251D64F76B3Q30900380-16BCC1A1-D06E-44D9-A662-26B3868584EFQ30919386-CAE6C72B-7571-4613-87FD-AA166E47AB3DQ30925093-0571755D-AE9C-4497-A588-EFC520CCD990Q30925202-745A34F1-2F49-4640-9ECD-F48CEB6243BFQ30984822-BB6D6D1E-C7EA-41C6-BFC9-9C87BFC4B868Q30985673-6D4C6679-A9A4-40D3-B348-D1F10EBE8BAAQ30987042-347F4030-54EF-4640-A44D-4D3726542166Q30989677-2A3C603A-0C8E-4C18-BFE8-13FEA806576DQ30989696-39ECCF3B-9C9C-4243-80E3-F01979F0BB7BQ30992278-0EFBD885-6D2B-49A0-A8A7-4355F381429FQ31008656-EFA64F65-719F-44E7-9455-AF152AD06565Q31077807-2F8F6BCC-C214-4544-8AE3-8B1CFAFAB7C0Q31082852-DD394CB5-713A-4E46-93AB-6AA80BA882F4Q31089851-A81873E5-D7A1-45CC-BC8D-4CC60FEC1974Q31096872-5F770F13-A03C-4781-B4D3-8E92AE5690B1Q31110771-EF6F1A33-18B5-45B7-B725-3495690B242D
P2860
Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2013 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
name
Caveats for the use of operati ...... rative effectiveness research.
@ast
Caveats for the use of operati ...... rative effectiveness research.
@en
type
label
Caveats for the use of operati ...... rative effectiveness research.
@ast
Caveats for the use of operati ...... rative effectiveness research.
@en
prefLabel
Caveats for the use of operati ...... rative effectiveness research.
@ast
Caveats for the use of operati ...... rative effectiveness research.
@en
P2093
P2860
P50
P1433
P1476
Caveats for the use of operati ...... rative effectiveness research.
@en
P2093
Joel H Saltz
Judith R Logan
Mark G Weiner
Peter J Embi
Philip R O Payne
Timothy H Hartzog
P2860
P356
10.1097/MLR.0B013E31829B1DBD
P433
P577
2013-08-01T00:00:00Z