Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.
about
Establishing operations and reinforcement effectsComparing the Effects of Multisensory Stimulation and Individualized Music Sessions on Elderly People with Severe Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Innovation of a reinforcer preference assessment with the difficult to test.Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals.The Impact of Stimulus Presentation and Size on Preference.Effects of reinforcement for alternative behavior during punishment of self-injury.Evaluation of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment method using activities as stimuli.Consumption and response output as a function of unit price: manipulation of cost and benefit componentsIncreasing habilitative services for persons with profound handicaps: an application of structural analysis to staff management.Teaching adults with severe and profound retardation to exit their homes upon hearing the fire alarm.A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.Assessing choice making among children with multiple disabilities.Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.Effects of a voice output communication aid on interactions between support personnel and an individual with multiple disabilities.The costs of eating: a behavioral economic analysis of food refusal.Defining, validating, and increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities.A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures.Increasing self-determination: teaching people with mental retardation to evaluate residential options.A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.An alternating treatments comparison of two intensive interventions for food refusal.Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferencesAn analysis of reinforcer substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses.Effects of intermittent punishment on self-injurious behavior: an evaluation of schedule thinningThe use of positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape-maintained destructive behaviorBasic and applied research on choice responding.Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequencesAssessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcersDisplacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.Emergence of reinforcer preference as a function of schedule requirements and stimulus similarityEvaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.Use of texture fading in the treatment of food selectivity.Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.A systematic evaluation of preferences identified through person-centered planning for people with profound multiple disabilities.Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.A component analysis of "stereotypy as reinforcement" for alternative behavior.The effects of presession exposure to attention on the results of assessments of attention as a reinforcer.Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessmentResponse-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.
P2860
Q30372658-D5104464-5C04-4360-AF1D-D99D4BACD1DCQ30386665-197F2928-447F-4C87-A6F6-661BDBE7BE0AQ30400814-0AAD012C-6EFA-4787-9C63-788C5825E24EQ30530181-CA2DEEE5-1E26-48D5-B3FD-EB2D73FB1931Q33765656-04B0547F-DE95-4068-B190-BDA117465A1DQ33876256-39DDC1D3-2AD4-4090-9B00-94646EFAD42CQ34101146-C61A0F26-2EDB-405F-8125-3C6D03B3C34FQ34101164-E923F3BA-8AF3-49B8-AE02-0A7F02F4894BQ34122134-F7A2CDCF-16CB-4A0C-81C5-76D0A4AC18B6Q34122165-77CB4A5E-3EEF-46E0-927D-0E9C4F9AFAB8Q34122512-896D9D1C-23F0-40A6-B713-512CE6FC0C0EQ34122618-1AED3A1A-69B2-4C5C-BBF2-1D21E088B337Q34122721-F693A7D4-994E-4DC0-B3B4-C4CA1A9F57C0Q34122727-691C2E10-B218-4E8F-9E3C-AA834DDC539CQ34122837-69CD7F65-F09C-4A2B-8F4B-E8FC1CC102E5Q34123055-F84753C3-0708-41FF-A2FA-F22EA4BEA5D2Q34123100-51060AA2-FD26-4EB6-AD53-8DBB30AA89B1Q34123112-B0A1ACA6-185B-4C53-B519-26A4AC5AAF61Q34123125-DB3C5063-D664-421B-8F5A-C38A111CD78DQ34133765-AB16FA4E-D6E1-46D4-8DF9-86B92B3441C6Q34133827-CC3FDBE8-56D5-4406-A4A3-D8FCFF3FDAFEQ34133859-F9C096D1-398C-46FA-8B73-376BEC4FBB00Q34133936-65EBF8B6-0B47-4502-88B8-DC925BC7BCD7Q34133955-7A33A257-9BBD-45BA-B060-78C0D6186E82Q34133995-1D61EC48-EA71-49B6-A9C5-9E516B957CB8Q34134002-AE737B90-13B1-404E-BF9C-63A0A0209D56Q34134015-E90838A2-2A34-4CA1-90AB-1FEF222FB899Q34134021-F670FE96-6617-4830-9E94-20A80792B493Q34134033-2DCC47E2-DCA7-42B1-9B96-D9B9547A921EQ34134061-8C9848A6-794A-42A3-BC02-0950B569ED7FQ34134315-B68B7619-C08D-4F17-927C-E95F642442C3Q34134322-329BD174-4856-4B91-B917-B4CAD0C3B05FQ34134509-4E5B6A41-F4AE-49C8-93A7-688213BFCE2EQ34134514-58AA5EE5-6649-44BA-A615-87C2BE1E4A22Q34134523-5D30936D-3F44-4EBC-98C2-9E5BBD2019CFQ34134716-1B44F7B1-EB98-4312-8203-9F3CE631509FQ34134775-08ACBEF4-6667-4E58-ADF7-361355F68723Q34135049-18C3F6CE-A140-4C9E-9D59-44D433C63F23Q34135054-59B510C5-5F4E-43A0-9E14-31DA26B8F328Q34135367-F833A2DE-F9DD-40EF-B932-97C065868A57
P2860
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.
description
1985 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1985 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1985 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1985年の論文
@ja
1985年論文
@yue
1985年論文
@zh-hant
1985年論文
@zh-hk
1985年論文
@zh-mo
1985年論文
@zh-tw
1985年论文
@wuu
name
Assessment of stimulus prefere ...... ofoundly retarded individuals.
@ast
Assessment of stimulus prefere ...... ofoundly retarded individuals.
@en
Assessment of stimulus prefere ...... ofoundly retarded individuals.
@nl
type
label
Assessment of stimulus prefere ...... ofoundly retarded individuals.
@ast
Assessment of stimulus prefere ...... ofoundly retarded individuals.
@en
Assessment of stimulus prefere ...... ofoundly retarded individuals.
@nl
prefLabel
Assessment of stimulus prefere ...... ofoundly retarded individuals.
@ast
Assessment of stimulus prefere ...... ofoundly retarded individuals.
@en
Assessment of stimulus prefere ...... ofoundly retarded individuals.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Assessment of stimulus prefere ...... ofoundly retarded individuals.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1901/JABA.1985.18-249
P577
1985-01-01T00:00:00Z