A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.
about
Evaluation of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment method using activities as stimuli.Basic and applied research on choice responding.Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.The effects of presession exposure to attention on the results of assessments of attention as a reinforcer.The effects of extinction, noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior as control proceduresSequential evaluation of behavioral treatments and methylphenidate dosage for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.An analysis of choice making in the assessment of young children with severe behavior problems.Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.An evaluation of stimulant medication on the reinforcing effects of playPredicting the relative efficacy of verbal, pictorial, and tangible stimuli for assessing preferences of leisure activities.An evaluation of methylphenidate as a potential establishing operation for some common classroom reinforcersA comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessmentsFurther evaluation of the accuracy of reinforcer surveys: a systematic replication.Effects of task difficulty and type of contingency on students' allocation of responding to math worksheets.The effects of providing access to stimuli following choice making during vocal preference assessments.Exploring the Clinical Utility of a Stimulus Avoidance Assessment to Enhance a Relaxation Training Model.An evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment with adolescents with emotional-behavioral disorders in an educational settingThe influence of a token economy and methylphenidate on attentive and disruptive behavior during sports with ADHD-diagnosed children.Carryover effects of free reinforcement on children's work completion.Evaluating the use of computerized stimulus preference assessments in foster care.Use of a latency-based demand assessment to identify potential demands for functional analyses.Children's preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement: A translational study of risky choice.Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.An evaluation of resistance to change with unconditioned and conditioned reinforcers.Establishing preference for unreliable reinforcement in adults with dual diagnoses.
P2860
Q34101146-317BD56B-7449-41C9-8077-DF9CE882CA59Q34133995-A604F799-E356-4197-986A-A0FC55000A07Q34134509-B432CF21-69F5-4446-8163-8D3FD367A5CAQ34134775-A4DE94FF-1388-4D4C-B6C4-3EEF5484C7C8Q34135444-924D9141-959F-4595-9E1B-30D2B1051E46Q34135513-4F3D70C9-7BF2-4912-87F6-5D24CB9FE914Q34135923-4C335EDE-A882-4958-9E1A-E1ECAFEDB8FBQ34218759-ECDC852F-E426-4596-B999-7618041CA9A7Q34777637-98D9ADDA-5029-4B29-A697-3075790CE3C3Q36594881-8C881B9C-22E9-475E-82CD-EE2640DB337FQ39708171-01D16C45-9D71-42EE-8E48-901C584BADB1Q39712352-EFBB97CE-35C4-45F6-BD57-5967C36442EBQ39712381-75B64038-AB1A-4B22-8463-E39661DD74EFQ39717898-911EF8B8-E345-41F5-8154-349F858912D4Q41270984-205C0B8B-51B9-4D74-929C-75FCB15B1A44Q41291750-9368A9D9-80E2-4727-A1B0-2008A452577DQ41820759-88E1915B-2F5B-42BF-A80F-63D10AA34DE4Q43585426-7F2333B8-31D1-4339-BBFE-D74FF021711CQ45290036-30D355EE-DFC9-451F-A5B5-92BBF979C76DQ47755299-298B9348-1D45-48B2-B18F-1F5579B91AFDQ47971506-60F1D591-6FE1-4771-8FBE-40BB5B7F08DBQ48014101-47E3C64A-787E-4A56-8DCC-E93E644102A5Q50344124-ACA48589-179C-45DA-93EA-75E9D0FE599AQ50580507-4A98C538-DF30-4C4A-8DF9-F5757D6974D0Q52098998-2D3F0D7A-1656-46E4-A7EB-E0FCA43F76B2
P2860
A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.
description
1996 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1996 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1996 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1996年の論文
@ja
1996年論文
@yue
1996年論文
@zh-hant
1996年論文
@zh-hk
1996年論文
@zh-mo
1996年論文
@zh-tw
1996年论文
@wuu
name
A comparison of reinforcer ass ...... d pictorial choice procedures.
@ast
A comparison of reinforcer ass ...... d pictorial choice procedures.
@en
A comparison of reinforcer ass ...... d pictorial choice procedures.
@nl
type
label
A comparison of reinforcer ass ...... d pictorial choice procedures.
@ast
A comparison of reinforcer ass ...... d pictorial choice procedures.
@en
A comparison of reinforcer ass ...... d pictorial choice procedures.
@nl
prefLabel
A comparison of reinforcer ass ...... d pictorial choice procedures.
@ast
A comparison of reinforcer ass ...... d pictorial choice procedures.
@en
A comparison of reinforcer ass ...... d pictorial choice procedures.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
A comparison of reinforcer ass ...... d pictorial choice procedures.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1901/JABA.1996.29-201
P577
1996-01-01T00:00:00Z