Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials.
about
Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trialsCurrent status of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinomaOptimal timing for early surgery in infective endocarditis: a meta-analysisBraun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisSystematic review of laparoscopy-assisted versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancerSystematic review of CYFRA 21-1 as a prognostic indicator and its predictive correlation with clinicopathological features in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A meta-analysisMeta-analyses including non-randomized studies of therapeutic interventions: a methodological reviewHybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysisSafety and efficacy of transurethral laser therapy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisEffect of gastrectomy with bursectomy on prognosis of gastric cancer: a meta-analysisMeta-analysis: preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization does not improve prognosis of patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinomaAdjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies.Systematic review and meta-analysis of liver resection for metastatic melanoma.Robotic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysisSingle-incision versus standard multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies.Quality of D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: is laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy as effective as open distal gastrectomy?Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies.Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.Meta-analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of rectal cancer.Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins.Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Meta-analysis.Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Comparison of Delta-Shape Anastomosis and Extracorporeal Billroth I Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes.Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication Regarding Efficacy and Safety: a Meta-Analysis.Efficacy of robotic-assisted prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinical trials.Using multiple types of studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions--a systematic review.Meta-analysis of immunohistochemical expression of hypoxia inducible factor-1α as a prognostic role in gastric cancer.Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.Randomized controlled trial versus comparative cohort study in verifying the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant interferon therapy after curative treatment for patients with viral hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma.Desideratum for evidence based epidemiology.Study design elements for rigorous quasi-experimental comparative effectiveness research.Laparoscopic versus open pancreas resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Laparoscopic versus open surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The impact of peri-operative anti-TNF treatment on anastomosis-related complications in Crohn's disease patients. A critical review.A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy.Robotic thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis.
P2860
Q24235283-B487A79B-27C1-47FA-82D6-75B4DFD1264FQ26745875-1B277837-9653-4F2B-9F67-0F2DFD3ED970Q26775060-60E1FEA6-2B42-4541-8D64-B51737EACCAAQ26798575-DD7D8BDC-4A9C-4DB1-AFD3-7BE4A6510DA4Q27693303-98457643-6470-427C-86B5-90C5ABFD854CQ28066963-5DA194E6-1991-4D96-9472-D91E0129940AQ28073236-5E24D6CD-3A89-47D1-89EF-42B11E18CDCEQ28081258-0EC00664-0BFD-49AB-8010-4F7F691D3F52Q34308908-2E6C6E9B-406F-41D4-A0A1-7A974AE85A77Q34405219-F94A76AF-9A64-4AF7-B071-FFA7FED4CFE8Q34627361-31FF8225-7E37-4317-9346-B41DCB67A932Q34689864-332E8135-7839-46B4-96E6-83C8AFBC7088Q34775309-83111E2B-09B2-4CF5-AD45-BE97FA3DB054Q35061416-6C9347EF-6177-4A73-BEF5-3CE547D94378Q35114514-AA504E8F-4FFC-47E7-B444-BBEAEC3BA0EFQ35311404-0B24351C-184C-4F7F-95CE-426AFB5A0318Q35419094-9BC17658-18E3-4CEA-B906-80D5D2ABB9CDQ35590446-FE8C8DF0-096C-44C6-A5E5-F4622CA1A83AQ35627290-1E01028B-A631-4F0B-9A3C-439F30B6BC0EQ35652005-90FDAEE5-3EF1-4B23-9CC1-ADD141B91C96Q35734332-FC08EB1B-DAEC-4046-B411-9593CC3C8884Q35756854-4A6AB6D7-AAFB-4C63-B7F0-132E2D643AD4Q36073395-E7FA9A17-8D4C-4675-A8A7-239B677E1565Q36133784-5CD269A1-E4F6-4566-9541-35260B5AFF1FQ36303829-6FD61D03-1BA9-45BA-9E8A-71FD17F4A238Q37346668-3F56393A-A8D7-42C8-885B-AD49C2008866Q37459030-FFD442E5-A077-4A89-880D-5C80717FEC40Q37578707-17510B7D-85A9-49F4-AC20-0E0248C92489Q37831839-E40D1A67-0CB7-48A0-8E36-91FDF65C8750Q38064335-81F69712-B14E-4CC0-B76E-A11C6A940A35Q38090516-89A6429F-DAE4-41F1-A3D7-33094BC2336DQ38134777-B8584889-0BA6-43A1-A046-C8FE007AF8BFQ38156063-99D5BEE8-699C-40D1-ABD3-D632D559B8DEQ38162881-FE77D46D-167E-4207-BDE6-F240B2CC4C01Q38163596-3494D749-B1E7-4DA1-B1F1-5C98D5661BFFQ38178525-58DFD875-B812-4345-A5C1-1F7C09B14E2FQ38193751-779258B8-9576-4BDE-A0CF-33249FEA4BEFQ38208757-CB34F2D5-6389-47A4-AA17-78C132D0F278Q39032521-E9BF2C0F-954B-43B0-A550-66F0EC85851DQ41578931-C09331C3-0150-49E4-8854-BA3FE85123AD
P2860
Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2009 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
name
Meta-analysis of well-designed ...... randomized controlled trials.
@ast
Meta-analysis of well-designed ...... randomized controlled trials.
@en
type
label
Meta-analysis of well-designed ...... randomized controlled trials.
@ast
Meta-analysis of well-designed ...... randomized controlled trials.
@en
prefLabel
Meta-analysis of well-designed ...... randomized controlled trials.
@ast
Meta-analysis of well-designed ...... randomized controlled trials.
@en
P2093
P1476
Meta-analysis of well-designed ...... s randomized controlled trials
@en
P2093
Christopher J Byrne
Jane M Young
Ned S Abraham
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2009.04.005
P577
2009-08-27T00:00:00Z