Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
about
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directionsMinimally invasive surgical approach to pancreatic malignanciesMinimally invasive pancreatic surgery - a reviewRobotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyondThe state of the art of robotic pancreatectomyRobotic surgery of the pancreas.Robotic-assisted surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer: the current evidence.Laparoscopic approach to gastrointestinal malignancies: toward the future with caution.State of the art of robotic pancreatic surgery.Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review.Minimally invasive pancreatectomy for cancer: a critical review of the current literature.Robotic surgery of the pancreas: The current state of the art.Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Recent Trends.Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes between Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: an Analysis of 1815 Patients from the ACS-NSQIP Procedure-Targeted Pancreatectomy Database.Analysis of the Cost Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy.Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy.Contemporary review of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center.Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: What is the Best "Choice"? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Non-randomized Comparative Studies.The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start.Delayed Gastric Emptying After Stapled Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis of Duodenojejunostomy in Pylorus-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Randomized Controlled trial.Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison of complications and cost to the open approach.Hybrid laparoscopic versus open pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: retrospective matched case comparison in 80 patients.Robotic distal pancreatectomy with or without preservation of spleen: a technical note.Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery in Singapore: single-institution experience with 20 consecutive patients.Early experience of laparoscopic and robotic hybrid pancreaticoduodenectomy.[Minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery for pancreatic cystic tumors].Reply to 'letter to the editor of Annals of Surgical Oncology concerning "robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis",' by Petrucciani Niccolò, et al. (ASO-2013-09-1427).Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery.Letter to the editor of Annals of Surgical Oncology concerning "robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis".[Robot-assisted pancreatic resection].
P2860
Q26766111-71FD5DA2-B49B-44D6-A4EB-FBD96D3401F7Q26774108-AFEA2DAE-4110-4FE3-84BF-7527D6AEBE62Q26799294-41B756F2-33AF-44B6-BCFA-097BA3C408AAQ26799438-71EF0E1A-7E15-4B86-ABD0-C919C8AD992DQ27015893-93B62374-D4EA-4697-9A95-BF329E0EB415Q34405064-A01634ED-4BE7-4047-845F-AA31E5563CE5Q36031030-B09030E9-E1A2-4211-93D0-5C446A5D3411Q37596192-4390030E-FCCB-4AAD-8CBC-659BA63BE69EQ38152984-A1CAEF01-4EF1-43E1-98C3-BD0F6F006026Q38240072-567C2F6E-2889-48B9-BA64-BAFA2A6A9DADQ38267347-D1F1E5F8-5A55-4B88-AACD-EC4B8092FE98Q38556594-0ECEC9E2-C514-4056-88D6-3ECF0C4C2575Q38741872-39FF770C-6F79-4DF8-9C38-1CFA6378DD6EQ38749640-283BD007-FA49-42A0-98E6-14265BA3222EQ38752204-20B237A9-059F-4BFA-B57E-B1B677664E6CQ39032521-F8F50E5E-6B1B-489A-AB18-A418543B430CQ39077575-18091EA8-AF6E-43CA-A41F-5F74E0436F0BQ39387353-AD9AFC97-E10E-4F74-833C-2741C678AAECQ40097609-421C0578-A0B0-40A7-AC24-8225E6D50A91Q40147964-1323898F-E294-4688-A498-770310DAB2BBQ40505084-FCC7D6A7-B0C6-4730-A6A8-74297848619CQ40705811-CF7C5D54-68CD-4573-9107-5DC231E6B499Q42674513-2227445C-E43F-4AFE-8AD2-DDDC82F50401Q42936163-58219F2F-CA0F-4CA1-850F-9056AFDF4F13Q49568218-60193E34-2959-47A6-B420-F58CAFB8BFE9Q50451854-3B7016C1-227F-444E-BC6D-6A51043F3380Q50495383-834CCC1B-AECA-420D-BB66-01262F0E4C05Q51093326-BBAD3A8E-A984-491F-8DD3-E4E0ECFD059EQ51100732-431370D0-1BD8-42B7-A378-B0F72C5684E1Q51109910-EFAFD357-1730-47DE-B3ED-2D272AF53A1FQ53513328-F87AE02A-C63D-4A2C-BFDD-45EE90DE28F2
P2860
Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
@en
type
label
Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
@en
prefLabel
Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
@en
P2093
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1245/S10434-012-2823-3
P577
2013-03-17T00:00:00Z
P6179
1033846470