Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.
about
Work-based assessments: making the transition from participation to engagementValidity and Feasibility of the Minicard Direct Observation Tool in 1 Training ProgramEffect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: a randomized, controlled trialAssessing communication quality of consultations in primary care: initial reliability of the Global Consultation Rating Scale, based on the Calgary-Cambridge Guide to the Medical Interview.Validity threats: overcoming interference with proposed interpretations of assessment data."On the same page"? The effect of GP examiner feedback on differences in rating severity in clinical assessments: a pre/post intervention study.Supervisor assessment of clinical and professional competence of medical trainees: a reliability study using workplace data and a focused analytical literature review.Advancing resident assessment in graduate medical education.The reliability of in-training assessment when performance improvement is taken into account.Impact of peer feedback on the performance of lecturers in emergency medicine: a prospective observational study.The temporal rating of emergency non-technical skills (TRENT) index for self and others: psychometric properties and emotional responses.Validation of a performance assessment instrument in problem-based learning tutorials using two cohorts of medical students.How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments.How to set the bar in competency-based medical education: standard setting after an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).Have standardized patient examinations stood the test of time and experience?Correlation of the National Emergency Medicine M4 Clerkship Examination with USMLE Examination Performance.BEME systematic review: predictive values of measurements obtained in medical schools and future performance in medical practice.Rater training to support high-stakes simulation-based assessments.Combating Grade Inflation in Nephrology Clinical Rotation Evaluations Using Faculty Education and a 5-Point Centered Rating Scale.Workplace-based assessment: raters' performance theories and constructsCanadian Physiotherapy Assessment of Clinical Performance: Face and Content Validity.The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10.Evidence of Reliability, Validity, and Practicality for the Canadian Physiotherapy Assessment of Clinical Performance.Assessing individual clinical performance: a primer for physicians.Twelve tips for implementing tools for direct observation of medical trainees' clinical skills during patient encounters.Exploring the impact of mental workload on rater-based assessments.Exploring the role of first impressions in rater-based assessments.In-training assessment developments in postgraduate education in Europe.Seeing the 'black box' differently: assessor cognition from three research perspectives.On the Assessment of Paramedic Competence: A Narrative Review with Practice Implications.Examining rater and occasion influences in observational assessments obtained from within the clinical environment.Rater cognition: review and integration of research findings.The effect of rater training on scoring performance and scale-specific expertise amongst occupational therapists participating in a multicentre study: a single-group pre-post-test study.In-training assessments: 'The difficulty is trying to balance reality and really tell the truth'.High correlation between performance on a virtual-reality simulator and real-life cataract surgery.Simulation-based assessment of paramedics and performance in real clinical contexts.The view from over there: reframing the OSCE through the experience of standardised patient raters.Clinical observed performance evaluation: a prospective study in final year students of surgery.Selecting and Simplifying: Rater Performance and Behavior When Considering Multiple Competencies.Inter-rater reliability and generalizability of patient note scores using a scoring rubric based on the USMLE Step-2 CS format.
P2860
Q27004712-8D3F17BA-4D20-4B91-888D-7F48EB7499DFQ27301545-3DADE30F-E6CC-4AB4-BE49-6801C0B4E12BQ30485193-80BC5936-5E28-488E-8075-1ED287E1F36DQ30573839-B6D97E70-551C-4045-9D1F-38A223603B07Q30909701-5F6C1B9D-B5B3-435F-9667-6C22ACF22538Q33771358-161246B0-ED7A-460E-B892-CE184440493DQ33910013-ECEF6E2D-B7E4-475B-9326-65F4F6E4D361Q34096772-DBF00920-40F2-45B6-9652-BF21B73AB781Q34368845-05B82FF6-B6EF-412A-9F24-CA807DD884BDQ34685959-794C6876-FC9C-4333-99F9-1809A9BDE44EQ35090462-C89877E1-9908-41C6-B50D-B3F523020903Q35755448-8751EED3-A692-48C2-B846-EEE3C294E0DEQ35872941-963C92C8-2DE3-4B08-96B1-5216CA7B6AE0Q35884321-61E8529C-6D30-4B36-BDB8-DD1BB3D927ACQ35901167-BAB41363-6E30-44FB-9A45-F6551CEB3330Q36435914-FCA51213-B268-4310-8260-95BA21CA0F77Q36481284-48AD580A-B420-49C2-A8A9-C3986C1A90BFQ36821502-39703D15-AC5E-43A3-BD53-1A197762AFCBQ36872081-8961457A-D645-4CB1-BAAA-589513F7E589Q37057636-9E4C2919-D98A-47A0-95B6-096397A12E72Q37127174-9C6A2608-0044-4894-96B5-5070787DDF47Q37157450-E41729C3-ED2D-4CAF-AAD4-A39D0501288BQ37445779-B6F59200-445F-440C-AC85-C8A3690A3981Q37713981-54A2684B-514F-40D8-BE5B-4F368F777220Q37793071-8918B458-590C-4356-ACAE-1F8FCF9C7C62Q38000975-A63D1D72-23C3-4A41-BCBD-2DB02B210A34Q38093126-DBFD1C7A-B86D-467C-9198-FF6B2B57F9BAQ38102737-8759BB81-6C79-4224-87B8-28E06933E15BQ38259397-72F2E2AA-DFC4-4FBC-A6B8-B0CF4A6840B6Q38653102-4A266111-5CDE-47F4-977F-9643E4CBD126Q38674872-7735F739-B542-4C07-B42C-6846784247D4Q38806755-A022F6CA-4E97-4089-91B3-5FE3F104D793Q38972683-09EDEFA1-3002-468D-AEE8-116403445444Q39084757-01BABD5C-F52D-4D48-A97B-4EAD5D35CBD9Q39344262-2F056673-4407-4A0E-99E4-459309F439C3Q39364332-20526D80-A5B3-41CC-B0D5-8042BAC68BA4Q39369509-A1187063-E1E4-4941-85CD-335B2AA2F74EQ39860986-12981FD4-8D02-4B88-8B54-3395F6A5BCE1Q40086279-26B95079-947E-4B2F-828B-C141DE770271Q40116966-5E76A45C-BCCE-45FE-850A-CB9E182F6428
P2860
Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
2003年论文
@zh
2003年论文
@zh-cn
name
Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.
@ast
Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.
@en
type
label
Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.
@ast
Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.
@en
prefLabel
Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.
@ast
Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.
@en
P2093
Debra A Klamen
Reed G Williams
William C McGaghie
P2860
P304
P356
10.1207/S15328015TLM1504_11
P577
2003-01-01T00:00:00Z