about
An international survey to identify the intrinsic and extrinsic factors of research studies most likely to change orthopaedic practice.Evidence-based practice, research utilization, and knowledge translation in chiropractic: a scoping reviewPrioritizing medication safety in care of people with cancer: clinicians' views on main problems and solutionsMost important factors for the implementation of shared decision making in sciatica care: ranking among professionals and patientsExplaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette surveyDepression-Burnout Overlap in Physicians.Rationing in the intensive care unit in case of full bed occupancy: a survey among intensive care unit physiciansBarriers to sexual health care: a survey of Iranian-American physicians in California, USA.The value of connected health information: perceptions of electronic health record users in Canada.Identification of priorities for improvement of medication safety in primary care: a PRIORITIZE study.Prioritizing problems in and solutions to homecare safety of people with dementia: supporting carers, streamlining care.Are primary care providers implementing evidence-based care for breast cancer survivors?Physician experiences and preferences in the treatment of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer in the United States: a physician surveyThe Effectiveness of an Educational Brochure as a Risk Minimization Activity to Communicate Important Rare Adverse Events to Health-Care Professionals.Family physicians' continuing professional development activities: current practices and potential for new options.Therapeutic interventions employed by Greater Toronto Area chiropractors on pregnant patients: results of a cross-sectional online survey.Knowledge and understanding of urinary incontinence: survey of family practitioners in northern Alberta.How to monitor patient safety in primary care? Healthcare professionals' views.How do family physicians measure blood pressure in routine clinical practice? National survey of Canadian family physicians.Third-party online surveys-science, selling, or sugging?Knowledge of paediatric concussion among front-line primary care providers.Suicidal ideation and behavior assessment in dementia studies: An Internet survey.Implications of not matching to a first-choice discipline: a family medicine perspective.Prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer screening: A national survey of Canadian primary care physicians' opinions and practices.Prevalence of Barriers and Facilitators to Enhancing Conservative Kidney Management for Older Adults in the Primary Care Setting.Perioperative care for lumbar microdiscectomy: a survey of Australasian neurosurgeons.Canadian family physician job satisfaction - is it changing in an evolving practice environment? An analysis of the 2013 National Physician Survey database.A preliminary investigation examining patient reported outcome measures for low back pain and utilisation amongst chiropractors in Australia: facilitators and barriers to clinical implementationPoint of care ultrasound training for internal medicine: a Canadian multi-centre learner needs assessment study
P2860
Q27336185-A855A1CE-536E-4F6F-9831-4421ADDE33F5Q28384110-26C85E45-CA09-4BF1-9F40-EFD05AB26D24Q33810926-A325A650-564E-4C48-BCAC-498A47B9C888Q35141978-441FB3F9-B9ED-4EFB-8D45-5F71BAC1BB43Q35675640-C3B52F82-AA6F-40C3-8813-62C8A0229532Q35941006-25BF400E-B65C-48D8-B0F6-9C949081E458Q36007777-0785CEA8-4F3E-4BAC-91BA-D5DA3991543CQ36077928-FDD642DF-DA36-4F1C-A772-2D43E418F15CQ36079205-C92216C2-428D-4934-916C-395FFD2B2714Q36194472-3976012E-4CB0-4F8C-9946-F1137E81F35FQ36254331-7BDE10A7-695F-442C-B8B2-3FAFDFE4CC6CQ36274685-9B2E3EFB-9906-4F8C-BED8-059609443879Q36528355-4A4A9128-E594-4373-BA4F-B8734F9E42C4Q36626210-9811218D-EED2-4560-9FD4-D2648F51AF26Q36794625-8EC1A351-82DD-4718-A2E2-68B03925D69BQ36866207-7AF97EC2-1E4F-4327-B811-73E6E514FFE0Q37008174-2AB5F990-E604-43E7-B379-D0004E9AB335Q37151669-DE74230B-66B9-4F9E-A144-483134A7D61DQ37698965-941C5889-A765-4852-A8EE-DB3E76D4FD59Q41657758-54D67612-2B2C-486D-8EBD-460B2BF35FADQ41928177-F2986E5D-531D-475D-B577-A2AB20FED72CQ42689695-D31889F0-875E-4952-BA9B-A69106D17DB5Q47095373-35D0A8E4-4AB1-49D1-98B1-AE527CA3C3B4Q47857777-7247348A-ED30-417F-82C0-D5ADDFF3BD90Q54956647-4F0039E9-09FB-44D0-953E-8F7181F084A7Q55176501-A39AA7C1-219D-42C3-850C-6184D2E9DF59Q55455255-3AE68B5D-2D3A-4DB9-B263-BF92D7FE776AQ58577960-D03C6C21-E4AA-4CA0-8B90-16145CD380B4Q58711374-D5E7DE32-3C4E-4052-A170-263885A45BCB
P2860
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
2012年论文
@zh
2012年论文
@zh-cn
name
Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?
@ast
Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?
@en
type
label
Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?
@ast
Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?
@en
prefLabel
Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?
@ast
Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?
@en
P2093
Ellen R Wiebe
Jacqueline MacKay
Janusz Kaczorowski
P2860
P304
P407
P577
2012-04-01T00:00:00Z