Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature.
about
Industry sponsorship and research outcomeAssociation of industry funding with the outcome and quality of randomized controlled trials of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritisThe quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMedAssociation between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials.A retrospective survey of quality of reporting on randomized controlled trials of metformin for polycystic ovary syndromeAssessing the quality of reports about randomized controlled trials of scalp acupuncture treatment for vascular dementiaHigh prevalence of potential biases threatens the interpretation of trials in patients with chronic disease.Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (1997-2007): An Assessment of Reporting Quality with a CONSORT- and STRICTA-Based Instrument.Assessing blinding in trials of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis based on blinding indexThe quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statementThe evolution of academic performance in nine subspecialties of internal medicine: an analysis of journal citation reports from 1998 to 2010.Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewA look at the potential association between PICOT framing of a research question and the quality of reporting of analgesia RCTs.Quality of randomized controlled trials reporting in the treatment of melasma conducted in China.Quality of reporting on randomized controlled trials on recurrent spontaneous abortion in China.Assessment of the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in otorhinolaryngologic literature - adherence to the CONSORT statement.Abstracts reporting of HIV/AIDS randomized controlled trials in general medicine and infectious diseases journals: completeness to date and improvement in the quality since CONSORT extension for abstracts.Quality of reporting in abstracts of RCTs published in emergency medicine journals: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literatureA systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literatureQuality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in chiropractic using the CONSORT checklist.Reporting practices of pharmacodynamic studies involving invasive research procedures in cancer trials.Framing of research question using the PICOT format in randomised controlled trials of venous ulcer disease: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literature.Quality of the supportive and palliative oncology literature: a focused analysis on randomized controlled trials.The quality of reports of randomized trials in multiple sclerosis: a review.The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: systematic review protocol.The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: a systematic review.Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials.Association between bibliometric parameters, reporting and methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in vascular and endovascular surgery.Impact of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist on reporting of randomized clinical trials in traditional Chinese medicine.Characteristics of funding of clinical trials: cross-sectional survey and proposed guidance.A retrospective survey of the quality of reports and their correlates among randomized controlled trials of immunotherapy for Guillain-Barré syndrome.Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review.Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol.Is research quality in orthopedic manual therapy trials stagnating? Reflections and pathways for improving research quality and advance our profession.The framing of research questions using the PICOT format in randomized controlled trials of venous ulcer disease is suboptimal: A systematic survey.How well do randomised controlled trials of physical interventions for people with spinal cord injury adhere to the CONSORT guidelines? An analysis of trials published over a 10-year period.Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions.Quality of reporting clinical trials published in five leading Sri Lankan medical journals.Quality of pilot trial abstracts in heart failure is suboptimal: a systematic survey.Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an update
P2860
Q24202591-059290E3-7283-4577-B516-1F291BE2E37AQ24289540-832DAEEA-41A2-4847-92C4-8039F90D6276Q24614702-F67D27AC-A150-42B5-BE39-78F48F0D4CC6Q33529867-56FF0E5D-E977-49DB-B078-852BC6FD10C1Q33614259-7B65F028-EB9B-4A40-BD9C-3002A4A7A80EQ33630630-0CFAD085-4E64-4A20-8731-2C50883DAC56Q33929737-001BDB54-FBD8-46C0-8B63-77D4868CA2AFQ34186801-38338B51-0CBA-4A14-A974-9F8ADBE85CECQ34280031-76A7E617-AB04-423B-BF83-1BE9D106AA1AQ34326852-18A1C9F9-2DDF-4A01-BE7C-1329E67AAF66Q34464928-9FF86C7F-4D04-463F-A772-B62ACED51361Q34495688-546DF695-E1C7-4F6A-A2F3-77D991C5889FQ35047008-ADE588B2-5D6A-456D-A53D-33E93DFAE436Q35441202-546D3F74-B4EA-479E-9E82-6962EDD4D290Q35500024-BAD8EDA1-D900-4425-86A2-76714D428D55Q35582262-90A5D4CA-71F6-4497-A996-8D401D92C34EQ36163056-1F14E903-D7C8-468E-9863-A0BCAD41C2AFQ36357098-F9D0F885-24E9-4A14-98A7-F0BADD929E04Q36831373-6AA7C5F2-890F-4520-8B08-584CF5398C03Q36986573-1AD4B600-43EE-458E-A634-F94C461D94B6Q37111197-7CD760B2-2151-49FB-898B-2D9A2F43A6EAQ37454704-8A1712C6-9811-4A7D-AD3E-59EB079F90BFQ37936328-F93647C0-9EEA-4FE6-AF19-1A7C494CA8EFQ38001975-CC79ACCC-DFD4-4F62-8F12-60B2FAD1F56CQ38076333-BEB9F3FC-67AD-4976-8C13-E7D3DC541243Q38163882-095EFD47-07EE-40C7-BF2D-29ABEFD128D4Q38595731-A37FC70B-A87C-4C7B-AFF3-774398C6B647Q38851151-7B44CA5E-C138-4FDC-B4FA-FB4BD3B783A0Q40580067-D8B56D2C-D2B8-4810-987A-719E361C7001Q42376739-EEAC6704-DF56-462D-8C2E-1A1EEB4BC739Q43411050-15CFC6A4-F85A-4458-A856-D16CA587DBFFQ45055297-CF77CE22-3299-4380-8C66-867F42746D70Q47096680-1C77EECA-623F-4F11-9CF2-1EB3CFE81486Q47154784-21C44F3D-215C-4D2C-97F7-5DA691B57B77Q47236893-1721D404-7655-4796-A5CC-B2FAB297725DQ50637574-2056FA45-0D4A-4576-A85A-3CD6A7A52218Q53274543-DA8C6C70-306D-4D7F-B84F-BCE9BC00D534Q54462205-FFE2EFAC-F0A1-4A36-8ABF-ACB1FAD89A8EQ55312423-2EA9E6EE-A856-48CD-B1BF-2FE554212B6EQ57491117-6CCC98F1-C3A0-4015-BD53-878F044A5812
P2860
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 26 June 2008
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature.
@en
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature.
@nl
type
label
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature.
@en
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature.
@nl
prefLabel
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature.
@en
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature.
@nl
P2093
P356
P1476
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature.
@en
P2093
Adefowope Odueyungbo
Lorena P Rios
Misha O Moitri
Mohammed O Rahman
P304
P356
10.1210/JC.2008-0817
P407
P577
2008-06-26T00:00:00Z