SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and small bowel obstruction: high risk of migration in the covered stent group.
about
Comparison between uncovered and covered self-expandable metal stent placement in malignant duodenal obstruction.Temporary duodenal stenting as a bridge to ERCP for inaccessible papilla due to duodenal obstruction: a retrospective study.Self-expanding metal stents for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.Endoluminal occlusion devices: technology update.Temporary placement of a covered duodenal stent can avoid riskier anterograde biliary drainage when ERCP for obstructive jaundice fails due to duodenal invasion.
P2860
SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and small bowel obstruction: high risk of migration in the covered stent group.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on October 2013
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and ...... on in the covered stent group.
@en
SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and ...... on in the covered stent group.
@nl
type
label
SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and ...... on in the covered stent group.
@en
SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and ...... on in the covered stent group.
@nl
prefLabel
SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and ...... on in the covered stent group.
@en
SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and ...... on in the covered stent group.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and ...... on in the covered stent group.
@en
P2093
Christoph Sarrazin
Frank Ulrich
Jörg Gerhard Albert
Jörg Trojan
Mireen Friedrich-Rust
Oliver Waidmann
Wolf Otto Bechstein
P2860
P304
P356
10.3748/WJG.V19.I37.6199
P407
P577
2013-10-01T00:00:00Z