about
A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies.Consulting communities on feedback of genetic findings in international health research: sharing sickle cell disease and carrier information in coastal Kenya.Staff's normative attitudes towards coercion: the role of moral doubt and professional context-a cross-sectional survey studyWhat a wish to die can mean: reasons, meanings and functions of wishes to die, reported from 30 qualitative case studies of terminally ill cancer patients in palliative careDid we describe what you meant? Findings and methodological discussion of an empirical validation study for a systematic review of reasons.The normative background of empirical-ethical research: first steps towards a transparent and reasoned approach in the selection of an ethical theory.Relative Values: Perspectives on a Neuroimaging Technology From Above and Within the Ethical LandscapeClient participation in moral case deliberation: a precarious relational balanceBeyond integrating social sciences: Reflecting on the place of life sciences in empirical bioethics methodologies.Using typing techniques in a specific outbreak: the ethical reflection of public health professionals.Free will and psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: a parallel with informed consent.The Care Dialog: the "ethics of care" approach and its importance for clinical ethics consultation.The use of empirical research in bioethics: a survey of researchers in twelve European countries.Quality of life in a broader perspective: Does ASCOT reflect the capability approach?Toward methodological innovation in empirical ethics research.The Role of Ethics in Reducing and Improving the Quality of Coercion in Mental Health Care.Toward critical bioethics.Managers' views on and experiences with moral case deliberation in nursing teams.Critical Realism and Empirical Bioethics: A Methodological Exposition.Fostering the ethics of ethics consultants in health care: an ongoing participatory approach.Monash editorial.Beyond recommendation and mediation: moral case deliberation as moral learning in dialogue.Good coercion: patients' moral evaluation of coercion in mental health care.Participant responsibility, researcher vulnerability and empirical ethics: a reply to Loughlin.Ethics by opinion poll? The functions of attitudes research for normative deliberations in medical ethics.Aims and harvest of moral case deliberation.Nurses' ethical reasoning in cases of physical restraint in acute elderly care: a qualitative study.Empirical ethics within rapidly changing practices: a forced detoxification program in psychiatry as a case example.Don't solve the issues! A plea for ambiguity within empirical ethics.What does empirical research contribute to medical ethics? A methodological discussion using exemplary studies.For an Ethnomethodology of healthcare ethics.Moral margins concerning the use of coercion in psychiatry.Preventing seclusion in psychiatry: a care ethics perspective on the first five minutes at admission.Methodology and Myopia? Some Praise, a Problem, and a Plea.Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensusAutonomy in Predictive Brain Implants: The Importance of Embodiment and DialogueEthical Dilemmas in the Practice of DBS
P2860
Q30373858-6DB15494-F817-4BB5-86C0-213FD4DD3B45Q33591674-DF7591DB-5E18-4DB2-981B-40D0A3E8646CQ33730912-6718FC4C-9226-4D6E-A49C-9B2CC8339785Q34088914-08CA4E9C-73A1-4DD6-8FBF-4A653B9FB362Q35282065-989A0995-5BE5-476B-AF0C-43CE7E66B961Q35608676-235CFC8B-7B67-449F-A066-65E1848DAD1DQ37253639-9544F44F-620F-4257-A98A-5D5AACF05C0DQ38546974-B7A99D96-9714-4274-86CD-15336EB0609AQ39451510-2E87F853-D30A-4263-B072-29185AF6ACC5Q40335628-496D0E05-BA4C-4318-A4F8-E56AEBC7AAABQ42414378-C39887CF-13DA-46B2-8396-CF986EC98541Q47204811-F559C097-950C-4B30-949C-256EA23F151FQ47257666-0149E8CD-A084-480E-BC52-C8DB98E26CDEQ47547836-C598DB7F-8B9C-458C-808B-D53BB1B79565Q47566234-3B357F91-0F3D-4E31-AF6B-DBF38026B94DQ47644318-FAC71FF7-255A-439A-9FD0-8F14A390E6BBQ47673081-3CCA4C3D-E4CE-4D8F-BCFF-F919BC590B33Q47690316-8CC68E80-60D8-43A9-9809-F4492F7DA5FFQ47739840-86CF02E2-8504-4062-8BA9-09CE4CBB08A4Q48038573-6E069014-2300-4879-8F20-48E8EA129A2AQ48043833-DCAAD92D-36C2-45AF-8EC9-EAA1A4ABB401Q48054194-D422C21C-7949-4091-8008-22B9DD6D6F02Q48059950-D4217E86-C4AD-458E-8F19-D9E478564A53Q48239271-C3D33A7A-DB1C-4DFA-A870-496DDFA8D41BQ48252317-0D051CD9-DC06-4D0A-A7B1-2F441476B3AFQ48295033-8087F042-D42B-4006-985C-C59E99D96F0EQ48346306-7B934E90-C857-4697-8AB9-1756F00C414DQ48411921-608CFA1A-D879-4D09-AE61-F5AEB2B3C25FQ48411958-6D4DFF51-E046-4E55-8B32-237333A2FA15Q48411975-D8D7438A-2CC2-493D-AD32-01CDEA0CEABAQ48476880-C3AAE99B-ADFB-4969-A0A8-E49C63F36831Q48673883-A9050D92-A11F-4632-A838-1A849AA89601Q50691012-0C17A2E8-277D-4064-A923-0214E875A406Q53682894-8EAB9DB3-DF43-4C98-B48C-3B3B6ACCC49EQ57639149-866FA7FF-A93B-418B-AADA-1563FEE4D27BQ58106908-059EBFDA-2EAD-4B9E-8C50-A0DD0FEE7FA1Q58286302-60D95B12-5A87-463B-B080-FDF66B8D4FE3
P2860
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on May 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Empirical ethics as dialogical practice.
@en
Empirical ethics as dialogical practice.
@nl
type
label
Empirical ethics as dialogical practice.
@en
Empirical ethics as dialogical practice.
@nl
prefLabel
Empirical ethics as dialogical practice.
@en
Empirical ethics as dialogical practice.
@nl
P1433
P1476
Empirical ethics as dialogical practice.
@en
P2093
Tineke Abma
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1467-8519.2009.01712.X
P577
2009-05-01T00:00:00Z