Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale.

Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38426020

about

Motor imagery reinforces brain compensation of reach-to-grasp movement after cervical spinal cord injury Limited acquisition and generalisation of rhotics with ultrasound visual feedback in childhood apraxia.Apathy after acquired brain impairment: a systematic review of non-pharmacological interventions.Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines.Neuroimaging in aphasia treatment research: standards for establishing the effects of treatment Single-case research design in pediatric psychology: considerations regarding data analysis.A theory-driven training programme in the use of emerging commercial technology: Application to an adolescent with severe memory impairment.Long-term maintenance of smartphone and PDA use in individuals with moderate to severe memory impairment.Optimizing behavioral health interventions with single-case designs: from development to dissemination.N of 1, two contemporary arm, randomised controlled clinical trial for bilateral epicondylitis: a new study design.Systematic Review of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation for Prospective Memory Deficits as a Consequence of Acquired Brain Injury.A systematic review of rehabilitation interventions to prevent and treat depression in post-stroke aphasia.Using ultrasound visual feedback to remediate velar fronting in preschool children: A pilot study Single-case experimental designs to evaluate novel technology-based health interventions.Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards A controlled study of changes in conversation following aphasia therapy for anomia Rehabilitation of executive disorders after brain injury: are interventions effective?Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review.The efficacy of outpatient and community-based aphasia group interventions: a systematic review.Systematic review of communication partner training in aphasia: methodological quality.Assigning and combining probabilities in single-case studies: a second study.Goal Management Training for rehabilitation of executive functions: a systematic review of effectiveness in patients with acquired brain injury.The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Development of clinical guidelines for the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury.Systematic review of restraint interventions for challenging behaviour among persons with intellectual disabilities: focus on effectiveness in single-case experiments.Systematic review of restraint interventions for challenging behaviour among persons with intellectual disabilities: focus on experiences.Efficacy of electronic portable assistive devices for people with acquired brain injury: a systematic review.Speech and swallow rehabilitation following partial glossectomy: a systematic review.The Effectiveness of Intensive Interaction, A Systematic Literature Review.Generalization and maintenance of treatment gains in primary progressive aphasia (PPA): a systematic review.Improved word comprehension in Global aphasia using a modified semantic feature analysis treatment.Google Calendar: A single case experimental design study of a man with severe memory problems.Psychological therapy for psychogenic amnesia: Successful treatment in a single case study.The behavioural treatment of muscle tension voice disorders: A systematic review.A new frontier in spaced retrieval memory training for persons with Alzheimer's disease.Computing tools for implementing standards for single-case designs.Interventions to increase engagement with rehabilitation in adults with acquired brain injury: A systematic review.External memory aids for memory problems in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.Discourse level reading comprehension interventions following acquired brain injury: a systematic review.Involvement of parents in intervention for childhood speech sound disorders: a review of the evidence.

P2860

Q26781600-97854AA3-1FAF-4804-AF9C-F21BC2657ACB Q30366687-95B8901E-8005-4AB4-817E-1E87919DEF4E Q30378151-B5DC520D-AC92-4C0E-B88A-F2F8B4BAFE49 Q30403973-E12058F0-5E58-4F91-85DB-51A92B65CC49 Q30573271-6DE96072-4C4C-41F1-876E-B81B178A2C20 Q30664875-CD005202-58FD-41F4-99EE-B9C63F24B557 Q33438470-66793400-2417-4925-B93E-78459F3F7D39 Q33441160-38D553E9-6FDD-4A22-9979-D2ECD56A201C Q34206861-A0236D78-CF92-4360-873E-3A871A631066 Q35624767-22008380-1845-4078-B193-95BD419DACE5 Q36253281-3E68819E-33AB-4DAD-BE91-490410E67152 Q36350183-D76E1417-43EC-4AA0-9DB2-7BE5F2D95042 Q36782781-825CC986-2CC2-41F7-95F9-DAB01F4542D1 Q36794887-993290A3-ABDD-4E5B-A10C-2A147E4F59BE Q36840320-B7AE937F-0702-4402-B8B6-3B6198F68D54 Q37641475-50A969C3-BAE7-4ABB-A794-7AC74CD33277 Q37848949-DCCEF073-1F46-46D0-8A94-914E9245A4BB Q37966077-D6326283-7584-4253-94B9-5EA41BDCDF5C Q38075617-FD0AC320-CC3E-4FED-9D69-1E8D7EAB0EE6 Q38085659-7664E9BA-9B05-4089-983E-0A196E5C8FE7 Q38092752-87F2AF9F-2888-4C53-A62E-5F5A7E70F772 Q38099850-CB775FE0-FA76-428E-B091-9FB0ADADA24E Q38129929-4F07D3D1-B478-4016-8C01-8E2FCF462DC5 Q38168302-99CB0266-ED77-45C9-AAAB-EAE201DF4535 Q38191514-D67F776B-A5DF-4463-9801-A86FFF61B87B Q38195000-4BF72F82-6020-4F16-B7D2-1F6EED181C52 Q38239738-BABB21E9-12B9-45C3-BA50-46661533F951 Q38290852-47BBD47C-7C33-45AC-8A01-7027E7B1A806 Q38309682-2C7FA2EF-31AC-4397-8E9F-34A0C945685C Q38381790-CD9CF7A1-54F2-4D81-88F5-F732BF09891B Q38388563-3FA5447E-9817-4940-AC60-FC13872218B0 Q38418566-71EA59C0-A565-4706-9D1B-ABE63D037777 Q38430887-2A193C24-0A1F-4819-82EC-C1FE1DB19CCA Q38466283-E42C3461-02A5-48C1-B651-70F94F6F3363 Q38476985-DE109DB6-7A27-47B7-85F3-40D4CE293A6A Q38584578-1D10D197-3765-4488-B6E3-FCC744757F24 Q38594719-E6DFE3F5-836C-4731-B7E3-67548EC96CA7 Q38648565-350194CE-01F4-4660-8F1B-2EF4B27B4A57 Q38737603-2CAD7D4B-6034-447A-B9EA-7B50A4529D61 Q38790396-E550A475-5A8E-4897-8543-53BF71026328

P2860

Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38426020

description

2008 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2008年の論文

@ja

2008年論文

@yue

2008年論文

@zh-hant

2008年論文

@zh-hk

2008年論文

@zh-mo

2008年論文

@zh-tw

2008年论文

@wuu

2008年论文

@zh

2008年论文

@zh-cn

name

Rating the methodological qual ...... erimental Design (SCED) Scale.

@en

type

label

Rating the methodological qual ...... erimental Design (SCED) Scale.

@en

prefLabel

Rating the methodological qual ...... erimental Design (SCED) Scale.

@en

P1433

Q38426020-6DE51D85-355E-4D78-8167-58547438ACE6

P1476

Q38426020-E012B9FC-7951-4ABB-B4B9-9C3B3995375E

P2093

Q38426020-41D75659-9D9D-4069-8FCD-A3991B5F22FA

Q38426020-BFB2FBAA-C6F9-4A39-BFA4-6E164F35E40F

P2860

Q38426020-0207ADDD-CF3B-4C0A-A60D-694ED3EA4F66

Q38426020-11ABBE03-7757-4A01-B27B-9BE2A5040C45

Q38426020-1D21E9D0-1C05-4322-A3DA-9B0AD3CAF3B9

Q38426020-28122A51-AE3F-45EF-97A1-9309B3454B73

Q38426020-4EF37B55-77B1-43EC-B8DC-9BECA3C7FEA2

Q38426020-6AC8526B-6F90-4B12-8B80-632050F1CC9C

Q38426020-76E87619-C161-4738-8BDD-BF364F4F5A2E

Q38426020-919703E1-D0C4-423A-AE45-BF92654AA04F

Q38426020-93918D7D-EDFF-4D55-9DF9-A79321E99E8C

Q38426020-B98E6530-C1A9-4389-8E11-BC6EE1F6AB88

P304

Q38426020-0DEFA5AA-9FBC-419C-97D0-733DAAADE220

P31

Q38426020-D08DCAE1-2FE2-4C73-9D7B-C4DA3A533288

P356

Q38426020-46CB70C9-B176-484E-A818-0E525FF2031E

P433

Q38426020-BD6FE4F0-F96F-4422-9426-34BBCF3C19C6

P478

Q38426020-DE8BCDA6-05F5-492C-B717-928FC1505CB3

P50

Q38426020-5C6C30C3-522C-4525-8958-E2E3BEC0D657

Q38426020-AD5F2588-E166-4042-9D22-99F4ED306AE1

Q38426020-B623CD7F-B262-4664-B2D1-FB51AA116F2D

Q38426020-E347A063-43F1-42F5-AE0F-BEE2DEC7B6F4

P577

Q38426020-61C67C10-0E0C-4F65-A389-E03000A395DC

P5875

Q38426020-1ABDA8F5-B387-442C-B3D6-AF0E6CB5A128

P698

Q38426020-175455FC-F05C-44D4-93EB-02914DF4E05F

P356

09602010802009201

P1433

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

P1476

Rating the methodological qual ...... erimental Design (SCED) Scale.

@en

P2093

Regina Schultz

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Robyn L Tate

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials

Evaluating single-subject treatment research: lessons learned from the aphasia literature.

The n-of-1 randomized controlled trial: clinical usefulness. Our three-year experience.

Case studies, single-subject research, and N of 1 randomized trials: comparisons and contrasts.

Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro).

Single subject controlled experiments in aphasia: the science and the state of the science

Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies.

Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology

Appraising the quality of randomized controlled trials: inter-rater reliability for the OTseeker evidence database

P304

385-401

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1080/09602010802009201

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

18

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Sharon A. Savage

Michael Perdices

P577

2008-08-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

5278512

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

18576270

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string