Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review.

Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38532441

about

Training on an inexpensive tablet-based device is equally effective as on a standard laparoscopic box trainer: A randomized controlled trial Surgical Simulation Update for Resident Education in Plastic Surgery.Conception of the Lübeck Toolbox curriculum for basic minimally invasive surgery skills.Comparison of 2 training programs for basic laparoscopic skills and simulated surgery performance in veterinary students.Using virtual reality simulation to assess competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.Laparoscopic skill assessment of practicing surgeons prior to enrollment in a surgical trial of a new laparoscopic procedure.Outcomes of an innovative training course in laparoscopic hernia repair.Validation of educational assessments: a primer for simulation and beyond.Low-cost three-dimensional printed phantom for neuraxial anesthesia training: Development and comparison to a commercial model.Assessing bimanual motor skills with optical neuroimaging

P2860

Q30836460-59A50559-C43B-4C1D-B17A-0A72FCCF55F9 Q47097521-96AFDABB-311C-4BBC-B003-83BB7693211C Q47805981-E5C67018-DA33-4130-B96F-10C47FDD21ED Q48223287-99D3FA30-B3D7-46D0-8CF7-FA007A6185DA Q48341389-54AB59CF-CC61-4CF3-966A-BAC324BE060C Q50471406-8B74EAA1-99DC-4A75-8F40-25052AFC070A Q50543403-3EE237C6-1B1F-439C-8C0B-7107C9128CF7 Q53647133-A2301784-DDC5-47EB-893E-8A90D0DE0514 Q55261810-59A9D58B-9B23-4AC1-B4C7-9F3D1DE9F88B Q57298221-5CD6001B-3BFE-4779-AF92-2A0A415D4FFA

P2860

Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38532441

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年論文

@yue

2015年論文

@zh-hant

2015年論文

@zh-hk

2015年論文

@zh-mo

2015年論文

@zh-tw

2015年论文

@wuu

2015年论文

@zh

2015年论文

@zh-cn

name

Validity evidence for the Fund ...... ent tool: a systematic review.

@en

type

label

Validity evidence for the Fund ...... ent tool: a systematic review.

@en

prefLabel

Validity evidence for the Fund ...... ent tool: a systematic review.

@en

P1433

Q38532441-94031C8E-AD02-47B6-BBBE-306FD77A91BD

P1476

Q38532441-D28CAF72-E663-4C34-8C1B-7E24DE1D3BCF

P2093

Q38532441-04D93F1E-9968-4EFD-81CB-23B333A710D4

Q38532441-32D69534-9378-4A12-9DDB-03AC19B2B97D

P2860

Q38532441-037ABA22-DCEA-4588-84C0-BE5A1103EE96

Q38532441-132A3703-C493-46CE-B6C4-ECB2605F340E

Q38532441-2F3B0C27-6C3D-425D-9335-3A4FAA2220BD

Q38532441-3FC6A080-C63A-4AED-BDA5-F1A1C63AC3EF

Q38532441-50E64E4D-4F93-415D-B65B-6C65E94494EB

Q38532441-5CAFAA39-1A80-4040-AC39-8FC03ED27555

Q38532441-6C026BC0-BC3E-4C1F-8BC2-A1A240457991

Q38532441-725830F4-6EA0-40CF-8A18-B62400A7940E

Q38532441-845F5145-3E7C-4221-BE23-760E2965D3B4

Q38532441-98808D12-9CD1-4187-BE95-4047CF6A4B59

P2888

Q38532441-4EAA1ED1-34A3-49A8-B56C-B5A7A2D6722B

P304

Q38532441-D55A74E6-90F2-46A5-9FE9-538A90031834

P31

Q38532441-5CF99701-EC9D-465F-AB96-9707A1BB9971

P356

Q38532441-7CFB25B0-08C1-47C4-8DA9-E4F1225CEE54

P407

Q38532441-E02BDD4C-F610-4CAA-8550-F1885B889100

P433

Q38532441-FC86CEBA-54AF-415F-980A-7D983FF17FFA

P478

Q38532441-7C09FA7C-E150-40A3-9130-14EEF70EDDC7

P50

Q38532441-C9567245-DBCB-4658-8963-30B7974D3C6F

P577

Q38532441-C14053B6-7B3C-4F8B-9FAD-FD1F82E30153

P6179

Q38532441-3AE06AE3-8BD6-4127-8ADA-DB888905595D

P698

Q38532441-7086E4BC-9F68-4337-82C7-680370EFFCE5

P356

S00464-015-4233-7

P1433

Surgical Endoscopy

P1476

Validity evidence for the Fund ...... ent tool: a systematic review.

@en

P2093

David A Cook

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Raaj K Ruparel

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.

Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data.

Linking simulation-based educational assessments and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

FLS simulator performance predicts intraoperative laparoscopic skill.

FLS and FES: comprehensive models of training and assessment.

Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: a systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality.

What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment.

The general surgery milestones project.

Simulation in laparoscopic surgery: a concurrent validity study for FLS.

P2888

s00464-015-4233-7

P304

512-520

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00464-015-4233-7

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

30

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Benjamin Zendejas

P577

2015-06-20T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1041985048

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

26091982

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string