Clinical trials and systematic reviews addressing similar interventions for the same condition do not consider similar outcomes to be important: a case study in HIV/AIDS.
about
Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases.Patient-important outcomes in systematic reviews: Poor quality of evidence.Standards for design and measurement would make clinical research reproducible and usable.Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting
P2860
Clinical trials and systematic reviews addressing similar interventions for the same condition do not consider similar outcomes to be important: a case study in HIV/AIDS.
description
2017 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2017年の論文
@ja
2017年学术文章
@wuu
2017年学术文章
@zh-cn
2017年学术文章
@zh-hans
2017年学术文章
@zh-my
2017年学术文章
@zh-sg
2017年學術文章
@yue
2017年學術文章
@zh
2017年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Clinical trials and systematic ...... ant: a case study in HIV/AIDS.
@en
type
label
Clinical trials and systematic ...... ant: a case study in HIV/AIDS.
@en
prefLabel
Clinical trials and systematic ...... ant: a case study in HIV/AIDS.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Clinical trials and systematic ...... ant: a case study in HIV/AIDS.
@en
P2093
Ian J Saldanha
Jill Owczarzak
Kay Dickersin
P2860
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2017.02.005
P577
2017-02-27T00:00:00Z