How (not) to argue about is/ought inferences in the cognitive sciences

about

How (not) to argue about is/ought inferences in the cognitive sciences

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q39957561

description

2014 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2014年の論文

@ja

2014年学术文章

@wuu

2014年学术文章

@zh-cn

2014年学术文章

@zh-hans

2014年学术文章

@zh-my

2014年学术文章

@zh-sg

2014年學術文章

@yue

2014年學術文章

@zh

2014年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

How (not) to argue about is/ought inferences in the cognitive sciences

@en

type

Item

label

How (not) to argue about is/ought inferences in the cognitive sciences

@en

prefLabel

How (not) to argue about is/ought inferences in the cognitive sciences

@en

P1476

How (not) to argue about is/ought inferences in the cognitive sciences

@en

P2093

Katinka J P Quintelier

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Normative ethics does not need a foundation: it needs more science.

Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.

Subtracting "ought" from "is": descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking.

P304

503

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

editorial

P356

10.3389/FPSYG.2014.00503

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

English

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Lieuwe Zijlstra

P577

2014-05-27T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

262931194

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

24904512

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

4034411

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string