Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
about
Cavity Shaving plus Lumpectomy versus Lumpectomy Alone for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cost Analysis of a Surgical Consensus Guideline in Breast-Conserving Surgery.Should New "No Ink On Tumor" Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines be Applied to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)? A Retrospective Review Using Shaved Cavity Margins.Reexcision Surgery for Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) MasterySM Database Following the SSO-ASTRO "No Ink on Tumor" Guidelines.Evaluating feasibility of an automated 3-dimensional scanner using Raman spectroscopy for intraoperative breast margin assessment.Close and Positive Lumpectomy Margins are Associated with Similar Rates of Residual Disease with Additional Surgery.
P2860
Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年学术文章
@wuu
2015年学术文章
@zh-cn
2015年学术文章
@zh-hans
2015年学术文章
@zh-my
2015年学术文章
@zh-sg
2015年學術文章
@yue
2015年學術文章
@zh
2015年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Implications of New Lumpectomy ...... icted Rates of Residual Tumor.
@en
type
label
Implications of New Lumpectomy ...... icted Rates of Residual Tumor.
@en
prefLabel
Implications of New Lumpectomy ...... icted Rates of Residual Tumor.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Implications of New Lumpectomy ...... icted Rates of Residual Tumor.
@en
P2093
Barbara L Smith
Kevin S Hughes
Maureen P McEvoy
Michele C Specht
Michelle A Gadd
Suzanne B Coopey
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1245/S10434-015-4916-2
P577
2015-10-14T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1040582762