A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q41613687

about

Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2015 Fast label-free multilayered histology-like imaging of human breast cancer by photoacoustic microscopy Omitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival Toolbox to Reduce Lumpectomy Reoperations and Improve Cosmetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference.Cavity Shaving plus Lumpectomy versus Lumpectomy Alone for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Appropriate margin for lumpectomy excision of invasive breast cancer.Clinical Cancer Advances 2016: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer From the American Society of Clinical Oncology Reoperation costs in attempted breast-conserving surgery: a decision analysis.Low rate of positive margins and re-excision after partial mastectomy in highly selected breast cancer patients: A Chinese single-institution experience.Impact of Consensus Guidelines by the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery in Stages 1 and 2 Invasive Breast Cancer.The importance of surgical margins in breast cancer.Intraoperative Tumor Detection Using a Ratiometric Activatable Fluorescent Peptide: A First-in-Human Phase 1 Study.Trends in Reoperation After Initial Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: Addressing Overtreatment in Surgical Management.Oncoplastic breast reconstruction: Patient selection and surgical techniques.Potential Safety Loophole of Fat Grafting in Breast Cancer Patients.Cost Analysis of a Surgical Consensus Guideline in Breast-Conserving Surgery.Mammographic extent of microcalcifications and oestrogen receptor expression affect preoperative breast carcinoma in situ size estimation.Intraoperative Margin Management in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Breast conservation in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): what defines optimal margins?Cavity Shaving Reduces Involved Margins and Reinterventions Without Increasing Costs in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer.Comparison of the time taken for localised breast surgery pre- and post-introduction of intra-operative digital specimen mammography.Economic Impact of Routine Cavity Margins Versus Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.Early Adoption of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Initial Experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.Removing more breast tissue in mastectomy can reduce need for second surgery.18F-fluorodeoxyglucose specimen-positron emission mammography delineates tumour extension in breast-conserving surgery: Preliminary results.Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes.A Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Form Accurately Transfers Supine MRI-Derived Tumor Localization Information to Guide Breast-Conserving Surgery.A feasibility study of a hybrid breast-immobilization system for early breast cancer in proton beam therapy.The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and lumpectomy cavity shavings on re-excision rate in pure ductal carcinoma in situ-A single institution's experience.Changes in margin re-excision rates: Experience incorporating the "no ink on tumor" guideline into practice.Cryo-Assisted Resection En Bloc, and Cryoablation In Situ, of Primary Breast Cancer Coupled With Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Tracer Injection: A Preliminary Clinical Study.Novel techniques for intraoperative assessment of margin involvement.Oncoplastic Surgery: Keeping It Simple With 5 Essential Volume Displacement Techniques for Breast Conservation in a Patient With Moderate- to Large-Sized Breasts.Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Two-Year Initial Experience at a Large Community Hospital.Factors Associated with Recurrence Rates and Long-Term Survival in Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer Ages 40 and Younger.Additional Cavity Shaving at the Time of Breast-Conserving Surgery Enhances Accuracy of Margin Status Examination.Do Patients After Reexcision Due to Involved or Close Margins Have the Same Risk of Local Recurrence as Those After One-Step Breast-Conserving Surgery?Feasibility of Intraoperative Breast MRI and the Role of Prone Versus Supine Positioning in Surgical Planning for Breast-Conserving Surgery.

P2860

Q28077183-F65789E2-6E28-4563-98EF-388C242245C1 Q30355628-BADC19DD-4F74-484A-8E22-857ED8878AB3 Q33843726-380E09B3-83B3-4AC6-9AAA-F083AB9E1CB6 Q35998675-384A1740-722E-4DE0-8C4B-6EC52D72342C Q36238393-B545F287-083E-43D7-B880-E2331B906B89 Q37082166-CB1D151B-257E-433C-AD85-7BD4A0038BD2 Q37359022-0528535E-23B3-4FCF-BBBC-B74BA3BFEAEA Q37367874-52B9A214-B494-45BB-AC3E-6F03EED37CAA Q37707079-2FA0FD8A-F1F5-4988-8A7E-03139A3C589C Q38574460-0085789C-4FB8-4097-8AD4-7346925F8767 Q38591049-36A9BE6D-4773-4BDD-BE38-5731AB643BAB Q38683050-A0885DB6-4D53-457B-A97F-A2F3C6DA4D85 Q38740605-851F3756-1E15-4C69-9743-D30FD74730D6 Q38785340-07FADAB7-ED50-4045-A645-635C1CAE9928 Q38806383-A4CB106E-F687-44C7-A1CF-D58874D20279 Q38834692-02404410-73D6-492E-A135-83B09EAD461F Q38957691-4C40D1EB-9D3B-4B1C-9176-E5203BD11FA2 Q39036935-254B8ED6-0A88-4297-8FA4-FD8788B6387B Q39045307-A5E57F5D-FB01-4572-B8AB-67250CD13A13 Q39100181-78CDB913-DE43-4C9C-A2B3-D248A8ADF15D Q39119467-E3F3F6E9-CFC4-4355-8830-673D3E3D74FE Q39309189-0E39C947-E13E-454A-A17C-B47D8D623702 Q39756651-3446B658-7506-406E-84D7-AC9C4236DA76 Q40431456-C12FC9C6-2807-46ED-A85E-0E8E43704055 Q40653280-04167B69-4C4F-4DEC-851A-B95D0A120729 Q44224096-BC2AD674-0F57-4F52-8CC8-996C3D2CF1A3 Q47346434-4D8AB01D-CBFB-4FB0-8E97-CF558A5C23FB Q47353775-E05E6E16-EE5B-4106-B992-60573898AB35 Q47854579-9A290642-FD70-4C0A-A5D2-B5C3A5753EDC Q47855930-188D1858-2DA0-43E0-920A-F819F7A88978 Q48320960-3635C12F-1D28-4083-8F1F-FB51B563DAB4 Q48335199-E82ADED8-CFD7-4C6D-AE7E-0D15B80C6E7E Q48531993-141DA919-7233-4D75-9540-216BB635D7D0 Q49404863-DEB00446-5E56-47DD-8375-06512DCC607A Q49627877-C08C7194-CEC6-43AB-998E-F2A64F33F667 Q50038821-6F4C3987-A401-49E2-865E-F4F02632DEAC Q53062859-723BDDC8-B460-4B4F-88C4-302FE175732A Q53132523-8C37E212-DEDE-4C41-B4F8-762F920E45D3 Q53220263-F0128DC3-0ED6-4CE0-8A63-929BFD1BA92B Q54162238-8531B213-011B-414E-B61B-FD4CA091D13B

P2860

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q41613687

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年論文

@yue

2015年論文

@zh-hant

2015年論文

@zh-hk

2015年論文

@zh-mo

2015年論文

@zh-tw

2015年论文

@wuu

2015年论文

@zh

2015年论文

@zh-cn

name

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.

@en

type

label

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.

@en

prefLabel

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.

@en

P1433

Q41613687-0754EFB7-3044-4714-B687-CB97EEACEF46

P1476

Q41613687-5B1EAA58-D385-42E4-A1AC-43CE05840D3C

P2093

Q41613687-26C721E5-2DCD-4F25-BDC8-B7537D7495FC

Q41613687-3F5473E7-4719-47F5-B8E0-C006EAB88900

Q41613687-4EE168E0-5467-4092-95F8-ADE04F6BE92E

Q41613687-5BC016C1-4AC7-4242-8E92-F3BF3172CD62

Q41613687-5FA54EB1-8CAF-4BE1-A018-D5F9F4F0CC94

Q41613687-67A0EF89-7BBA-44D3-B10F-9C94E9DF6467

Q41613687-81C92429-6B60-4881-A3E1-76136A3B0751

Q41613687-903B671E-C8EA-4310-8615-CF79DF968ADB

Q41613687-92FDB687-B021-400B-90DE-E32A2BFC1FF3

Q41613687-A443328B-3D53-4DB1-B4BE-7E9CA76FEA42

P2860

Q41613687-11B85933-3834-4B0E-BBE9-36C4E4662548

Q41613687-138B4EF3-6307-4B1F-A1F2-033E9A54060B

Q41613687-1632DE02-EA8D-4B4D-86E0-D9F6FBD6504F

Q41613687-2A8831A7-46AD-4AFA-B19E-2C3D5A260A09

Q41613687-3E2A4218-CFBB-49EE-9DA6-97E98381FFA2

Q41613687-B7C29977-C2BB-46C0-B82E-CE7E73618184

Q41613687-E38F2DF0-8A23-40FC-B6E5-4AEAA921D6FF

Q41613687-E3927A84-D569-4F00-B3FD-B422FB5B861A

Q41613687-F192EDF2-714F-4132-A1B4-079D7D76B0CF

Q41613687-F2F8C53F-9962-4255-B7F8-E71355D2BE7C

P304

Q41613687-E10CE771-5B65-4742-AE3B-0C291B31A236

P31

Q41613687-01971D23-FC70-42EF-A99A-8D4B8B8AD909

P356

Q41613687-1B419665-7282-43C1-A46E-AFD1E1563E14

P407

Q41613687-BED349D1-588A-48A2-8B6D-6A7591011FCD

P433

Q41613687-A00DAE5F-D7B6-4A59-B7C0-CA0201B518CF

P478

Q41613687-8C810EC7-8159-471A-B600-972B91DFA74B

P577

Q41613687-ED1FFDEB-6057-491F-BBBD-B9186BAA9EBF

P698

Q41613687-25B4EDD2-7614-4C23-8777-CCE34DD7B862

P932

Q41613687-61C280A9-4EF6-462A-AA8D-006430CA56AE

P356

P1433

The New England Journal of Medicine

P1476

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.

@en

P2093

Anees B Chagpar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Brigid K Killelea

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Donald R Lannin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Fangyong Li

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Karen Stavris

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lajos Pusztai

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Malini Harigopal

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Meghan Butler

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nina R Horowitz

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Theodore N Tsangaris

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2010.

Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Influence of surgical technique on mastectomy and reexcision rates in breast-conserving therapy for cancer

Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates.

Volume of excision and cosmesis with routine cavity shave margins technique.

In Search of a Gold Standard Scoring System for the Subjective Evaluation of Cosmetic Outcomes Following Breast-Conserving Therapy.

Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer.

Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery.

Lumpectomy specimen margins are not reliable in predicting residual disease in breast conserving surgery.

Overall survival in patients with a re-excision following breast conserving surgery compared to those without in a large population-based cohort.

P304

503-510

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1056/NEJMOA1504473

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

373

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2015-05-30T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

26028131

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

5584380

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string