A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
about
Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2015Fast label-free multilayered histology-like imaging of human breast cancer by photoacoustic microscopyOmitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survivalToolbox to Reduce Lumpectomy Reoperations and Improve Cosmetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference.Cavity Shaving plus Lumpectomy versus Lumpectomy Alone for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Appropriate margin for lumpectomy excision of invasive breast cancer.Clinical Cancer Advances 2016: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer From the American Society of Clinical OncologyReoperation costs in attempted breast-conserving surgery: a decision analysis.Low rate of positive margins and re-excision after partial mastectomy in highly selected breast cancer patients: A Chinese single-institution experience.Impact of Consensus Guidelines by the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery in Stages 1 and 2 Invasive Breast Cancer.The importance of surgical margins in breast cancer.Intraoperative Tumor Detection Using a Ratiometric Activatable Fluorescent Peptide: A First-in-Human Phase 1 Study.Trends in Reoperation After Initial Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: Addressing Overtreatment in Surgical Management.Oncoplastic breast reconstruction: Patient selection and surgical techniques.Potential Safety Loophole of Fat Grafting in Breast Cancer Patients.Cost Analysis of a Surgical Consensus Guideline in Breast-Conserving Surgery.Mammographic extent of microcalcifications and oestrogen receptor expression affect preoperative breast carcinoma in situ size estimation.Intraoperative Margin Management in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Breast conservation in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): what defines optimal margins?Cavity Shaving Reduces Involved Margins and Reinterventions Without Increasing Costs in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer.Comparison of the time taken for localised breast surgery pre- and post-introduction of intra-operative digital specimen mammography.Economic Impact of Routine Cavity Margins Versus Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.Early Adoption of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Initial Experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.Removing more breast tissue in mastectomy can reduce need for second surgery.18F-fluorodeoxyglucose specimen-positron emission mammography delineates tumour extension in breast-conserving surgery: Preliminary results.Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes.A Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Form Accurately Transfers Supine MRI-Derived Tumor Localization Information to Guide Breast-Conserving Surgery.A feasibility study of a hybrid breast-immobilization system for early breast cancer in proton beam therapy.The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and lumpectomy cavity shavings on re-excision rate in pure ductal carcinoma in situ-A single institution's experience.Changes in margin re-excision rates: Experience incorporating the "no ink on tumor" guideline into practice.Cryo-Assisted Resection En Bloc, and Cryoablation In Situ, of Primary Breast Cancer Coupled With Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Tracer Injection: A Preliminary Clinical Study.Novel techniques for intraoperative assessment of margin involvement.Oncoplastic Surgery: Keeping It Simple With 5 Essential Volume Displacement Techniques for Breast Conservation in a Patient With Moderate- to Large-Sized Breasts.Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Two-Year Initial Experience at a Large Community Hospital.Factors Associated with Recurrence Rates and Long-Term Survival in Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer Ages 40 and Younger.Additional Cavity Shaving at the Time of Breast-Conserving Surgery Enhances Accuracy of Margin Status Examination.Do Patients After Reexcision Due to Involved or Close Margins Have the Same Risk of Local Recurrence as Those After One-Step Breast-Conserving Surgery?Feasibility of Intraoperative Breast MRI and the Role of Prone Versus Supine Positioning in Surgical Planning for Breast-Conserving Surgery.
P2860
Q28077183-F65789E2-6E28-4563-98EF-388C242245C1Q30355628-BADC19DD-4F74-484A-8E22-857ED8878AB3Q33843726-380E09B3-83B3-4AC6-9AAA-F083AB9E1CB6Q35998675-384A1740-722E-4DE0-8C4B-6EC52D72342CQ36238393-B545F287-083E-43D7-B880-E2331B906B89Q37082166-CB1D151B-257E-433C-AD85-7BD4A0038BD2Q37359022-0528535E-23B3-4FCF-BBBC-B74BA3BFEAEAQ37367874-52B9A214-B494-45BB-AC3E-6F03EED37CAAQ37707079-2FA0FD8A-F1F5-4988-8A7E-03139A3C589CQ38574460-0085789C-4FB8-4097-8AD4-7346925F8767Q38591049-36A9BE6D-4773-4BDD-BE38-5731AB643BABQ38683050-A0885DB6-4D53-457B-A97F-A2F3C6DA4D85Q38740605-851F3756-1E15-4C69-9743-D30FD74730D6Q38785340-07FADAB7-ED50-4045-A645-635C1CAE9928Q38806383-A4CB106E-F687-44C7-A1CF-D58874D20279Q38834692-02404410-73D6-492E-A135-83B09EAD461FQ38957691-4C40D1EB-9D3B-4B1C-9176-E5203BD11FA2Q39036935-254B8ED6-0A88-4297-8FA4-FD8788B6387BQ39045307-A5E57F5D-FB01-4572-B8AB-67250CD13A13Q39100181-78CDB913-DE43-4C9C-A2B3-D248A8ADF15DQ39119467-E3F3F6E9-CFC4-4355-8830-673D3E3D74FEQ39309189-0E39C947-E13E-454A-A17C-B47D8D623702Q39756651-3446B658-7506-406E-84D7-AC9C4236DA76Q40431456-C12FC9C6-2807-46ED-A85E-0E8E43704055Q40653280-04167B69-4C4F-4DEC-851A-B95D0A120729Q44224096-BC2AD674-0F57-4F52-8CC8-996C3D2CF1A3Q47346434-4D8AB01D-CBFB-4FB0-8E97-CF558A5C23FBQ47353775-E05E6E16-EE5B-4106-B992-60573898AB35Q47854579-9A290642-FD70-4C0A-A5D2-B5C3A5753EDCQ47855930-188D1858-2DA0-43E0-920A-F819F7A88978Q48320960-3635C12F-1D28-4083-8F1F-FB51B563DAB4Q48335199-E82ADED8-CFD7-4C6D-AE7E-0D15B80C6E7EQ48531993-141DA919-7233-4D75-9540-216BB635D7D0Q49404863-DEB00446-5E56-47DD-8375-06512DCC607AQ49627877-C08C7194-CEC6-43AB-998E-F2A64F33F667Q50038821-6F4C3987-A401-49E2-865E-F4F02632DEACQ53062859-723BDDC8-B460-4B4F-88C4-302FE175732AQ53132523-8C37E212-DEDE-4C41-B4F8-762F920E45D3Q53220263-F0128DC3-0ED6-4CE0-8A63-929BFD1BA92BQ54162238-8531B213-011B-414E-B61B-FD4CA091D13B
P2860
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
2015年论文
@zh
2015年论文
@zh-cn
name
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
@en
type
label
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
@en
prefLabel
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
@en
P2093
Anees B Chagpar
Brigid K Killelea
Donald R Lannin
Fangyong Li
Karen Stavris
Lajos Pusztai
Malini Harigopal
Meghan Butler
Nina R Horowitz
Theodore N Tsangaris
P2860
P304
P356
10.1056/NEJMOA1504473
P407
P577
2015-05-30T00:00:00Z