Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials. Current issues and future directions.
about
Albendazole versus praziquantel in the treatment of neurocysticercosis: a meta-analysis of comparative trialsEffects on coronary heart disease of increasing polyunsaturated fat in place of saturated fat: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationOccupational therapy for multiple sclerosisOxygen versus air for nebulising beta-agonist bronchodilators in acute asthmaBlinded versus unblinded assessments of risk of bias in studies included in a systematic reviewTherapeutic ultrasound for acute ankle sprainsBlinded versus unblinded assessments of risk-of-bias in studies included in a systematic reviewInjectable vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseMarital therapy for depressionInfluenza vaccine for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseConservative treatments for whiplashConservative treatments for whiplashHow to assess the external validity and model validity of therapeutic trials: a conceptual approach to systematic review methodologyOral mucolytic drugs for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic reviewEffectiveness and safety of short vs. long duration of antibiotic therapy for acute bacterial sinusitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trialsEvaluating the role of quality assessment of primary studies in systematic reviews of cancer practice guidelinesDevelopment and evaluation of a quality score for abstractsReporting quality of randomized trials in the diet and exercise literature for weight lossQuality of life assessment and reporting in randomized controlled trials: a study of literature published from JapanDeflazacort for the treatment of Duchenne Dystrophy: a systematic reviewThe therapeutic effect of clinical trials: understanding placebo response rates in clinical trials--a secondary analysis.The Effects of Low-Carbohydrate Diets on Psychosocial Outcomes in Obesity/Overweight: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled StudiesReporting Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Nephrology Urology Monthly JournalMeta-analysis of Huangqi injection for the adjunctive therapy of aplastic anemiaProximal muscle rehabilitation is effective for patellofemoral pain: a systematic review with meta-analysisThe totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein's technique for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized clinical trialsThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaborationMilrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysisCarpal tunnel syndrome and the use of computer mouse and keyboard: a systematic reviewIncreased risk of hemorrhage in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab: An updated meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials.A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: use of meta-analyses in evidence-based obstetrics.Ultrasound therapy for acute ankle sprains.The outcome of control groups in clinical trials of conservative treatments for chronic mechanical neck pain: a systematic reviewQuality of reporting of key methodological items of randomized controlled trials in clinical ophthalmic journals.Meta-analysis of rare and adverse event data.Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsReporting randomised clinical trials of analgesics after traumatic or orthopaedic surgery is inadequate: a systematic review.Interpreting meta-analyses of pharmacologic interventions: the pitfalls and how to identify them.Effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.
P2860
Q21092309-008AF9B0-1CEC-479C-902D-1FE96C36B7DDQ21092321-A450F319-BDDA-4C95-B2BA-03941EB65B9CQ21092360-DBC86F78-9FE6-4AF2-AC01-42CACF91C614Q22252977-A4C5B7FA-70DD-4429-9AC1-54E673D362CAQ24194709-3180E6EB-6CFC-406C-B00E-8BC731D906EFQ24234543-2F31D2B3-AE73-4298-BCFB-AD4F420F965EQ24236519-465986C9-0DB2-4B7A-A72B-A68DF726DC20Q24243446-BAECADC9-9A98-41C4-8F15-4AC195C51AF4Q24243866-071E2223-EE14-41C0-9D53-C60413F31D73Q24243921-775E8A40-9720-4C83-BAE8-A5D4543C3819Q24244657-EF563358-015F-4290-A5CE-8D4F1A93124AQ24245335-30540E30-3EAA-41DD-AEB3-2817301B0BBAQ24247502-B50A48E9-92C0-4DA5-805B-A259D2510EBAQ24289013-81F746FB-F421-43A6-A8E6-8BF2B1A8910BQ24635097-6A6F80E1-5C3A-4F40-8833-8441F952E71AQ24657558-B0361830-A664-4C80-9987-D5753BE18075Q24799623-1EB6E8B0-6BB7-499B-8419-8726DD66C652Q24800755-12D94322-B35E-4332-B2A1-CAA00EA9DD91Q24802148-2F5DC0EF-7A9B-4F57-B8AF-F89850E80B80Q24802506-7F1C884A-7EAD-4A48-B43B-361D640149C6Q24805160-D768A491-5DA4-4F4D-9AC6-8948F6353A55Q24812178-356E04D4-37A8-4342-AF55-81DDD132B6AAQ26745563-A92A8E82-90B2-45CF-947C-9B1111839A0DQ26777112-041990A0-8E94-4096-A212-0B9009CFEB52Q26784339-C52BFA4E-FA36-4F71-B32F-8427082E7986Q26801793-B83A1A90-18BC-49BF-BB89-ACFF61FFD9D0Q27010502-B63C36AF-43DF-49F9-851C-299AFCD48BACQ27860581-F29EE4FC-5293-4D4F-9B4C-A0B036FB3065Q28277307-C5B18E4F-D138-4670-92BC-F6FEAFFD2901Q28385978-D71E2F68-A32A-47F0-85C1-B96C21DCF518Q30248296-ED0312AC-94A0-4A9B-8489-2CEFE0549836Q30681106-C1CCD882-02D6-4F1B-A23A-1366BEE151EFQ30820746-E09BB05B-634B-42CB-92E5-ECB737DA20F2Q33250598-025BBCCB-D6D6-49D9-B043-FD3442D520AAQ33312477-9C82D531-984D-4352-B62E-72F608AC618AQ33508895-001FD106-950F-42B6-ABD3-D77652C5D743Q33516983-321F462D-D9BA-44B2-9CA0-5AADCF844A79Q33523413-0A3797C3-A202-48C4-AF41-B2FB68ED664EQ33677555-F4E0C76B-352E-4939-9F49-B75356D06046Q33685973-3FAA4E18-96BD-4B99-BC79-ACB38DE096E2
P2860
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials. Current issues and future directions.
description
1996 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1996年の論文
@ja
1996年論文
@yue
1996年論文
@zh-hant
1996年論文
@zh-hk
1996年論文
@zh-mo
1996年論文
@zh-tw
1996年论文
@wuu
1996年论文
@zh
1996年论文
@zh-cn
name
Assessing the quality of rando ...... issues and future directions.
@en
type
label
Assessing the quality of rando ...... issues and future directions.
@en
prefLabel
Assessing the quality of rando ...... issues and future directions.
@en
P2860
P1476
Assessing the quality of rando ...... issues and future directions.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1017/S0266462300009570
P577
1996-01-01T00:00:00Z