Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice.
about
Online assessment of patients' views on hospital performances using Rasch model's KIDMAP diagramA comparison of administrative and physiologic predictive models in determining risk adjusted mortality rates in critically ill patientsFunctionality and feedback: a protocol for a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of PROMs data to improve patient care."It's hard to tell": the challenges of scoring patients on standardised outcome measures by multidisciplinary teams: a case study of neurorehabilitation.The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme and spirometry: rewarding quality or just quantity? A cross-sectional study in Rotherham, UK.National targets, process transformation and local consequences in an NHS emergency department (ED): a qualitative study.Does quality of care for hypertension in primary care vary with postcode area deprivation? An observational study.Determinants of treatment plan implementation in multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: a mixed-methods studyQuality standards for child and adolescent mental health in primary careResults from an audit feedback strategy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in-hospital care: a joint analysis from the AUDIPOC and European COPD audit studiesHospital standardized mortality ratio: consequences of adjusting hospital mortality with indirect standardizationAssessing the acceptability of quality indicators and linkages to payment in primary care in nova scotia.Measurement of quality to improve care in sleep medicine.Exploring sources of variability in adherence to guidelines across hospitals in low-income settings: a multi-level analysis of a cross-sectional survey of 22 hospitalsA pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.Derivation and validation of a risk adjustment model for predicting seven day mortality in emergency medical admissions: mixed prospective and retrospective cohort study.Development and validation of a score for evaluating comprehensive stroke care capabilities: J-ASPECT Study.Randomized controlled trials in health technology assessment: overkill or overdue?Fifteen years of continuous improvement of quality care of type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care in Catalonia, SpainSelf reported receipt of care consistent with 32 quality indicators: national population survey of adults aged 50 or more in EnglandRecorded quality of care for depression in general practice: an observational study.Effect of alerts for drug dosage adjustment in inpatients with renal insufficiency.Evidence of methodological bias in hospital standardised mortality ratios: retrospective database study of English hospitals.Do specialized centers and specialists produce better outcomes for patients with chronic diseases than primary care generalists? A systematic review.Assessing appropriateness of osteoarthritis care using quality indicators: a systematic review.Implementation of a quality improvement initiative in Belgian diabetic foot clinics: feasibility and initial results.Interface transition checklists in spinal surgery.The Riks-Stroke story: building a sustainable national register for quality assessment of stroke care.The 'off-hour' effect in trauma care: a possible quality indicator with appealing characteristics.Large-Scale Evaluation of Quality of Care in 6 Countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia Using Clinical Performance and Value Vignettes.Creating a culture of clinical excellence in critical care nutrition: the 2008 "Best of the Best" award.Meeting the four-hour deadline in an A&E department.Transforming risk factors into an unbiased mortality model.Performance monitoring of substance use disorder interventions in the Veterans Health Administration.Nurse-led case management for community dwelling older people: an explorative study of models and costs.The value of different aspects of person-centred care: a series of discrete choice experiments in people with long-term conditions.Two-epoch cross-sectional case record review protocol comparing quality of care of hospital emergency admissions at weekends versus weekdays.Racial and Socioeconomic Differences Manifest in Process Measure Adherence for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway.Did case-based payment influence surgical readmission rates in France? A retrospective study.Quality control in neuroradiology: discrepancies in image interpretation among academic neuroradiologists.
P2860
Q21254578-D3828F91-8222-4ACC-BA05-D2A8585975B8Q30428185-0278A7F6-9194-43B2-9750-641327D0FB2EQ30837997-34A6739B-8D51-41A8-ACDA-0DE03623D7C5Q33378813-069534DE-6073-4829-A67C-D963717BB7B6Q33475225-D7B2B593-F83B-4A70-8592-5B10D94520C4Q33785518-FA12C7D7-549B-4D5D-9704-5D2AF51E66C3Q34065368-EF728E2A-7A47-4A12-AADA-D7F4E072D89FQ34237642-6C2BFD89-2A23-48C3-95E5-5C199B557E6BQ34294155-93CCFCF8-58D8-4597-8E11-4AE99FED3498Q34344391-FC52F1D4-E8A9-41AF-B0D7-C0D8B8BC6DF0Q34672373-CB666BA5-6F7F-433A-9B1B-9639EE6B2C98Q35021414-5D545849-352C-43D8-837F-F5C4E2152BF0Q35138188-A18544D8-1043-4609-8469-3E06EC28D110Q35559381-92F075F4-647A-4B47-8E7A-476063736A46Q35895550-99DDD653-AA28-4412-BD96-004DBFA981B2Q35925476-774F0910-2787-4108-B363-9DC5E3EB6140Q36292043-FB14511C-ECA6-4177-BFBD-E08BF7285AE5Q36516936-7C3C2A4B-2FD7-4FDF-8EAE-7E080CBB34CDQ36645367-8CE0282E-8385-4294-909E-A2E8ACB4D246Q36836710-81AA8E32-E5F4-4B28-B35C-6B87D61E6977Q37069931-A986E899-C5F3-4847-B53C-27078413F9EFQ37112771-52B63415-2BD8-48F1-AFA2-33982D743BECQ37138270-4BE14293-C09B-4D31-8896-A32E3BB34AA7Q37592849-128D90B9-116C-497E-8ECA-8431A62B0719Q38530279-BF07C9AB-028B-4D12-9C8A-B3EB86D6F16BQ39267952-908146DB-3944-4FD1-8E7D-D5E68E64B28AQ39694993-F243E5BC-34B4-46F8-8658-4A913007B5FDQ39775982-9805EC3B-2729-4F3D-ABF9-E3A48240975AQ41774061-AF4266CC-D86B-4351-826B-9265DA85ADDFQ42366675-2BC252F7-67F7-4E34-8A40-582ADD2536BEQ43794480-16A9EEF3-8E92-4624-9E59-83CF7B800570Q44059584-1CD159EE-7D81-4429-A8BF-C6049BBB5B67Q44888306-4D2C4AEF-7618-46A4-A374-15EBC262ECA1Q45331480-20F49AF6-0517-4E26-BF6F-A041208FD75CQ46118903-60C7B45F-9B63-47C3-900B-56A421A7EDC6Q47158448-BF62DC1B-03AB-49A0-8FA7-D0030DE2230CQ47217964-A2F95F8E-05DC-4AA6-81C2-39D87A252B84Q47690796-12F86638-3DFF-4E39-99A6-2E8524C46099Q49390385-CD66847C-5779-4156-BB7A-48BE00DD215BQ50997697-D66DEDC0-A310-4624-A792-03BC7CF1EE46
P2860
Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice.
@en
type
label
Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice.
@en
prefLabel
Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice.
@en
P2093
Celia A Brown
Jon Nicholl
Richard J Lilford
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJ.39317.641296.AD
P407
P577
2007-09-01T00:00:00Z