An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states.
about
US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29.Testing a discrete choice experiment including duration to value health states for large descriptive systems: addressing design and sampling issues.An empirical comparison of the OPQoL-Brief, EQ-5D-3 L and ASCOT in a community dwelling population of older peopleBetter outcomes for hospitalized patients with TIA when in stroke units: An observational study.Using blocked fractional factorial designs to construct discrete choice experiments for healthcare studies.Study protocol for valuing EQ-5D-3L and EORTC-8D health states in a representative population sample in Sri Lanka.A Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measure for Use in Patients with HIV: A Validation Study.Condition-specific or generic preference-based measures in oncology? A comparison of the EORTC-8D and the EQ-5D-3L.Is Best-Worst Scaling Suitable for Health State Valuation? A Comparison with Discrete Choice Experiments.Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?The Impact of Different DCE-Based Approaches When Anchoring Utility Scores.QLU-C10D: a health state classification system for a multi-attribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30.Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format.Response Patterns in Health State Valuation Using Endogenous Attribute Attendance and Latent Class Analysis.Development of an EORTC-8D utility algorithm for Sri Lanka.Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30.Treatment and Outcomes of Working Aged Adults with Stroke: Results from a National Prospective Registry.How Should DCE with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?Estimating health state utility values from discrete choice experiments--a QALY space model approach.The better than dead method: feasibility and interpretation of a valuation study.Comparing and transforming PROMIS utility values to the EQ-5D.A Review of Generic Preference-Based Measures for Use in Cost-Effectiveness Models.Head-to-Head Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Health Values.Using Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration to Model EQ-5D-5L Health State PreferencesAssessing utility values for treatment-related health states of acute myeloid leukemia in the United States
P2860
Q27308886-4C46EB77-6B26-4389-B236-0B7F57D7C711Q33818374-9D61F5B8-DE22-4E88-94D1-55F01EBE5B93Q36107700-04E9295D-B3F2-4C60-AFED-E01E4C0A8629Q36963317-1DE3D586-AEE5-4E8C-9A11-2AA9369E2F42Q36968477-94C0559F-0023-466B-9DDE-7280237266F3Q37153727-6364EC07-8201-48B5-8997-4BC226C2D246Q37645443-DBBEC076-2279-41AC-94D0-3A2B77FC95A0Q37733475-15745D09-7C30-432F-BF65-BF0815DBFCBAQ39131270-479853F6-4F31-471A-8018-93AEF516D0CEQ39165629-9609B5ED-D158-40BF-A964-EBB9E225F4F2Q39872768-E3CA9412-F0D0-422C-9C63-7AD1115C09CEQ40083161-A220E3E5-3BB0-45A3-B76A-C88BF690CDB0Q40569987-1FE1D33B-65A4-4ECD-8C2D-EDD80B313F96Q41673679-CCF0BC27-46BD-4491-9A1A-53237689DE6CQ44572362-FC5C24BB-4603-4591-A017-0EF1363BB5B5Q47261501-6742D371-278D-45E8-A770-6128023AA6ACQ47574488-DC4D1686-FFB4-4F5B-A827-6B5BB301F25EQ47690105-5D0C61F6-63BA-4488-A578-BA700DF8918FQ48072882-6F22046F-0AAC-4ABF-95CF-B9BDECDA0EDDQ48075818-8A08B4E9-9FE8-4CB4-B739-8D1427E2CFDCQ48372464-33EC6436-D2A7-4EF8-8EEC-1E9D85476906Q50100243-203342F7-6036-45D0-834F-8401312107FEQ52603310-1C394F53-3E82-472D-92BC-769C51C848B8Q57994220-9379D9F5-84F2-490D-9277-AF9BBAC93B2BQ58706473-1161260A-B24B-4AD8-ADDC-0EFA8C747ED2
P2860
An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states.
@en
An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states.
@nl
type
label
An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states.
@en
An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states.
@nl
prefLabel
An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states.
@en
An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1433
P1476
An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states.
@en
P2093
Deborah Street
Madeleine T King
Paula Cronin
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/HEC.2953
P407
P577
2013-06-13T00:00:00Z