Randomized response estimates for the 12-month prevalence of cognitive-enhancing drug use in university students.
about
Evaluating the drivers of and obstacles to the willingness to use cognitive enhancement drugs: the influence of drug characteristics, social environment, and personal characteristicsImpact of contextual factors and substance characteristics on perspectives toward cognitive enhancementThe impact of neuroscience on society: cognitive enhancement in neuropsychiatric disorders and in healthy peopleLife context of pharmacological academic performance enhancement among university students--a qualitative approach.Reduced self-control leads to disregard of an unfamiliar behavioral option: an experimental approach to the study of neuroenhancement.Modeling students' instrumental (mis-) use of substances to enhance cognitive performance: Neuroenhancement in the light of job demands-resources theoryUse of illicit and prescription drugs for cognitive or mood enhancement among surgeonsTo dope or not to dope: neuroenhancement with prescription drugs and drugs of abuse among Swiss university students.Associations between physical and cognitive doping--a cross-sectional study in 2.997 triathletesAttitudes towards prescribing cognitive enhancers among primary care physicians in Germany.A survey of substance use for cognitive enhancement by university students in the NetherlandsAttenuated Neural Processing of Risk in Young Adults at Risk for Stimulant Dependence.A Comparison of the Cheater Detection and the Unrelated Question Models: A Randomized Response Survey on Physical and Cognitive Doping in Recreational TriathletesNeuroenhancement and the strength model of self-control.Using Caffeine Pills for Performance Enhancement. An Experimental Study on University Students' Willingness and Their Intention to Try NeuroenhancementsBehavioral Risk Profile of Men Who Have Sex with Men in Beijing, China: Results from a Cross-sectional Survey with Randomized Response Techniques.Pharmacological Neuroenhancement in the Field of Economics-Poll Results from an Online Survey.(Mis)use of Prescribed Stimulants in the Medical Student Community: Motives and Behaviors: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Subjective stressors in school and their relation to neuroenhancement: a behavioral perspective on students' everyday life "doping"Drugs As Instruments: Describing and Testing a Behavioral Approach to the Study of Neuroenhancement.Pharmacological Neuroenhancement: teachers' knowledge and attitudes-Results from a survey study among teachers in Germany.The use of Ginkgo biloba in healthy elderly.Substances used and prevalence rates of pharmacological cognitive enhancement among healthy subjects.Prescription stimulant medication misuse: Where are we and where do we go from here?The Role of Anonymity in Determining the Self-Reported Use of Cocaine and Nonmedical Prescription Stimulant Use Among College Students.Analgesics use in competitive triathletes: its relationship to doping and on predicting its usage.Reflections on Addiction in Students Using Stimulants for Neuroenhancement: A Preliminary Interview Study.Prevalence of and motives for pharmacological neuroenhancement in Switzerland--results from a national Internet panel.Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement.Augmented memory: a survey of the approaches to remembering more.Cerebral Correlates of Automatic Associations Towards Performance Enhancing Substances.Multiple sensitive estimation and optimal sample size allocation in the item sum technique.Nonmedical Use of Prescription Medications Among Medical Students in Greece: Prevalence of and Motivation for Use.Application of randomized response techniques for investigating cannabis use by Spanish university students.A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group, efficacy study of alpha BRAIN® administered orally.Assessing the validity of two indirect questioning techniques: A Stochastic Lie Detector versus the Crosswise Model.Internet addiction in college students and its relationship with cigarette smoking and alcohol use in Northeast China.Modafinil alters decision making based on feedback history - a randomized placebo-controlled double blind study in humans.Mining Patients' Narratives in Social Media for Pharmacovigilance: Adverse Effects and Misuse of Methylphenidate.Prevalence Estimates for Pharmacological Neuroenhancement in Austrian University Students: Its Relation to Health-Related Risk Attitude and the Framing Effect of Caffeine Tablets.
P2860
Q21203313-439AAEC4-F432-4282-A669-A27463882A47Q21558807-D860ADF2-604B-4C8D-8E8E-F5B8A5C8E02EQ26799352-AEE357ED-B75A-429F-934E-2900BA916B44Q30440509-2A8A0F6B-3B63-48B0-9E17-3E69BFCDFF56Q33641194-03654254-B9F6-4A6B-B37D-DC60CEE39C3CQ33713093-E0436FF2-4E22-494D-B573-185296595647Q34660460-527E5DCF-0043-4123-85D6-1E5F25041C42Q35043495-E9F394EE-8F48-4341-B274-E31BDAB37C8AQ35043553-E2D6702C-60B1-450E-B314-1B415982D834Q35084473-5FCFC76D-27E9-491B-9E66-39466ED0232EQ35089860-DFCB22AC-5010-4071-8A3C-C924308D99D0Q35664311-1D2BF1E0-3568-49FD-9069-5F8BE345B1A1Q36027844-35C60126-6FBA-4BAD-97C5-6A4E3BF8BB48Q36098295-AA4D9900-7410-43AF-82EC-0D3B398AB93EQ36559458-2A55D4E6-DB71-4A03-B988-F9E2CB5D19DCQ36720062-8F32664D-827B-40B4-A288-E9FB50858E4AQ36810065-6A04248B-0451-42B1-9430-8B9260F48643Q36838005-219843EE-B3C4-42AD-93FD-A67A059445F1Q36972628-FC04E2BC-259B-4044-8882-EF59909A05B1Q37180741-1C2F193A-60BA-45A2-AD30-3A756B406ADFQ37267760-F9FE3586-D863-4FA0-84BB-913E91CCF762Q37471077-39760156-04DA-443E-8FD3-36037ABEAAA7Q38248567-F194603C-424C-4939-BF66-88E8320EF0E1Q38815927-75EF125F-5C2B-4084-8F05-3048A5AB3AE1Q39836985-8CFBDD5E-AC68-405B-B74B-6C9E153114F1Q39971677-F6A7EC08-D463-4A68-96AF-2EE38D21E5BFQ40727646-9C549ABB-84B1-4F59-8E08-43D1F6EA0794Q41572093-4C8CA320-C8CF-422D-9178-8956FC3DC766Q41840279-354ED546-23FD-4020-9892-8DA3C65DACE1Q41990051-3AC0310A-40E8-439A-9540-A9335C95BA16Q43120983-2294E03C-636F-4FEF-86BD-F1FD43BD4E57Q47185004-4C06D5E9-B2AF-4432-8857-492C06A91BF7Q47327935-B5A2BEB1-2E29-41BE-A438-4FECDD3C9D8DQ47726473-1AC5A68C-6FDA-4CFC-9660-6CD281B9AF66Q47887706-F728511D-6EA6-49FE-B016-C30F8AFE7E00Q48009220-9642DF5B-68C5-4E9C-B509-B41C31B0353EQ48199953-5170BA17-1AD8-412E-8529-2D9A6741F2E3Q50487407-570168A2-2169-4584-94BF-D3E8559A5B65Q55115862-9D1C7626-6593-4721-9C02-E339DC32BB55Q55405889-A5DDAB71-7ED8-4352-B059-C5062A962F8E
P2860
Randomized response estimates for the 12-month prevalence of cognitive-enhancing drug use in university students.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Randomized response estimates ...... ug use in university students.
@en
Randomized response estimates ...... ug use in university students.
@nl
type
label
Randomized response estimates ...... ug use in university students.
@en
Randomized response estimates ...... ug use in university students.
@nl
prefLabel
Randomized response estimates ...... ug use in university students.
@en
Randomized response estimates ...... ug use in university students.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Randomized response estimates ...... ug use in university students.
@en
P2093
Andreas G Franke
Heiko Striegel
Klaus Lieb
Pavel Dietz
P2860
P356
10.1002/PHAR.1166
P407
P577
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z