Common sense and figures: the rhetoric of validity in medicine (Bradford Hill Memorial Lecture 1999).
about
Comparative quantification of health risks conceptual framework and methodological issues.Distribution of major health risks: findings from the Global Burden of Disease studyHow to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement with quantitative PET using variance component analysis: a proposal for standardisation.Woods and Russell, Hill, and the emergence of medical statistics.Causal inference methods to study nonrandomized, preexisting development interventions.Generalizing results of randomized trials to clinical practice: reliability and cautions.How to generalize efficacy results of randomized trials: recommendations based on a systematic review of possible approaches.Pharmacokinetic Variability of Drugs Used for Prophylactic Treatment of Migraine.Rhetoric and argumentation: how clinical practice guidelines think.Study control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials.Reproducibility issues in science, is P value really the only answer?Can family physicians practise good medicine without following clinical practice guidelines? Yes.Les médecins de famille peuvent-ils exercer une bonne médecine sans suivre les guides de pratique clinique?: OUI.Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials.Going from evidence to recommendations: Can GRADE get us there?The origins of Austin Bradford Hill's classic textbook of medical statistics.
P2860
Q24801397-0D166F84-A3FE-45CD-AA0B-7B2B2469813EQ24802507-776DD852-0630-409D-AA23-39AEB4454934Q27312017-77538C72-3DAC-4AC4-A911-B5D16DD8D9EDQ34119979-0AA993ED-83CE-4A80-B1C0-A263DB72557DQ34450393-C49A4AB1-3116-44F1-BE5E-77CB780967EEQ36684579-8FB80CD9-3ED6-47D9-B716-E4016AA8FD21Q38031999-38C9FD86-B259-44DD-AAEA-BED22370F5B0Q39239760-3D387208-8AD1-48E0-9A38-D9C250DD7DEFQ39414985-14033FC2-EE09-41EB-8781-7323B5286FD5Q40638787-CA4DEC46-5D12-49C1-9A88-28B2440E139FQ42577006-A1AAD785-D11C-4F03-8862-7451BEFB66D5Q42734192-969A8803-08F0-405E-94CF-B572DFD98FC1Q46089591-4B24F271-AC6C-424F-8CB1-10660D007A1BQ47560059-0CD379D1-C477-483F-9861-F94AFC4CECC7Q48286292-4B3AB2D4-FD17-4745-BB82-CBE92EBE32C4Q50601575-5423EA68-4EE1-4040-8040-B6BE4C908404
P2860
Common sense and figures: the rhetoric of validity in medicine (Bradford Hill Memorial Lecture 1999).
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年学术文章
@wuu
2000年学术文章
@zh-cn
2000年学术文章
@zh-hans
2000年学术文章
@zh-my
2000年学术文章
@zh-sg
2000年學術文章
@yue
2000年學術文章
@zh
2000年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Common sense and figures: the ...... d Hill Memorial Lecture 1999).
@en
Common sense and figures: the rhetoric of validity in medicine
@nl
type
label
Common sense and figures: the ...... d Hill Memorial Lecture 1999).
@en
Common sense and figures: the rhetoric of validity in medicine
@nl
prefLabel
Common sense and figures: the ...... d Hill Memorial Lecture 1999).
@en
Common sense and figures: the rhetoric of validity in medicine
@nl
P2860
P1476
Common sense and figures: the ...... d Hill Memorial Lecture 1999).
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23<3149::AID-SIM617>3.0.CO;2-E
P407
P577
2000-12-01T00:00:00Z